- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: United's dragged passenger hires high-powered Chicago personal injury lawyer
Posted on 4/13/17 at 11:36 am to shel311
Posted on 4/13/17 at 11:36 am to shel311
quote:
I mean, still acting like it was 100% certain that it was NOT oversold despite United and multiple experts in the field saying otherwise, it's just odd. Can you at least see from my angle how that seem very peculiar?
When United was sticking to their guns I could see where they had a case. Good debate cannot be had when everyone is on the same side. Also I picked my argument when I saw the gross misunderstanding of terms and the assertions that United had no legal standing.
The PR team's verbiage completely kills UA's case. They have chosen to completely waive their rights and fall on their face in front of the court of public opinion. This completely killed my argument, but to act like my argument was not valid and case could not be made prior to United giving up is asinine.
1
Posted on 4/13/17 at 11:39 am to AwesomeSauce
quote:I didn't do that!!!
This completely killed my argument, but to act like my argument was not valid and case could not be made prior to United giving up is asinine
Intentionally.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 11:39 am to shel311
quote:
So we basically agree, while both playing devil's advocate on opposite sides.
Message board life, at its finest.
I am pretty sure we do this often, and often end up in a stalemate though we have the same opinion on the situation.
Now to decide whether that is a good or a bad thing.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 11:41 am to shel311
quote:
Intentionally.
Cheers m8, hopefully you have a long weekend to enjoy
.Posted on 4/13/17 at 11:44 am to AwesomeSauce
quote:I do!!!
Cheers m8, hopefully you have a long weekend to enjoy .
Hopefully everyone stops posting about this topic, so I get away from these threads and actually enjoy it!.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 11:55 am to AwesomeSauce
quote:
I think the key would be defining when a flight is oversold.
that definition is in the contract actually in section 1 / definitions
Check in is probably also defined
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 11:57 am
Posted on 4/13/17 at 11:58 am to Sneaky__Sally
quote:
that definition is in the contract actually in section 1 / definitions
As has been discussed yes it is. The definition of check-in is not, because check-in is not defined the actual flat definition of when precisely a flight is oversold is not defined.
ETA: Had you read beyond the first sentence I believe I clearly defined what is up for debate and could be contested.
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 4/13/17 at 12:04 pm to AwesomeSauce
i didn't mean to come off as a dick, just letting some people know that definitions are in there. I'm posting from my phone at a table at lunch, can't be reading everything everybody writes you know?
Posted on 4/13/17 at 12:11 pm to Sneaky__Sally
I understand, sorry for being a dick. I'm a bit pretentious and certainly an arsehole, but doing it on here vs in the real world has been great for my relationships with friends and family.
Posted on 4/13/17 at 12:27 pm to AwesomeSauce
Its cool I do the same thing. Comment would have normally been dickish in intent, but I was in a good moment...
Posted on 4/13/17 at 6:38 pm to nc14
Still waiting on an answer.
Bucknut?
Chicken?
Bucknut?
Chicken?
Page 36 of 36
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News