Started By
Message

re: United Airlines denies woman's emotional support PEACOCK on flight

Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:49 pm to
Posted by PT24-7
Member since Jul 2013
4596 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:49 pm to
Hope she sues and wins. Its time for this to stop and no one can be the judge of what is quantifiable of "emotional support". Either all animals are or none are, you can't discriminate.
Posted by Backinthe615
Member since Nov 2011
6871 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:50 pm to
I’d just like to know what anybody in that picture not looking at the peacock in an airport terminal found more interesting than a peacock in an airport terminal.
Posted by 91TIGER
Lafayette
Member since Aug 2006
19641 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

Good. This shite is out of control.



Would love to see the first person that honestly downvotes you.
Posted by crap4brain
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2004
2694 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:54 pm to
What do you mean I can't bring my support African elephant on the plane with me?
Posted by dietcoke7
LA
Member since Aug 2007
1218 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:54 pm to
Once saw an apparently healthy woman with both a pig and a parrot as comfort animals. Pig looked to be about 40 lbs. and parrot rode on her shoulder. Not on my flight but saw them board.
Posted by daeizbae
New Orleans, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2018
335 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

he's a peacock, you gotta let him fly


This deserves a standing ovation good sir.
Posted by MightyYat
StB Garden District
Member since Jan 2009
25029 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 3:00 pm to
If you've never heard a peacock's screech go ahead and google it. It's ridiculously startling the first time you hear it.
Posted by Eauxs Eaux Face
Member since Dec 2016
289 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 3:07 pm to
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37602 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Either all animals are or none are, you can't discriminate.


Shirley you can't be serious.
Posted by someLSUdoosh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2016
893 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

How the frick does one even go about getting an emotional support peacock


You go online and pay $10 to print out a bullshite piece of paper that says its a support animal without any training or proof or whatever.

Apparently there are laws (not a lawyer...just what ive read in diff places) that you can't ask someone on the spot to prove that their animal is a support animal.

Posted by PT24-7
Member since Jul 2013
4596 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Shirley you can't be serious


I am, all this “emotional support” stuff is BS. No animals should be allowed to fly on a plane where the passengers are. Hats off to this lady for blowing the lid off this thing. Who’s the judge that says your Doberman is emotional support but my goldfish isn’t? By doing so we’re playing judge of feelings.

Feelings shouldn’t constitute policy. If it’s not a human it doesn’t fly with the humans no matter how much you live it. End of story
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Isnt your wife pregnant? Oh little Caterpillar, life is about to slap you with some justice


Oh yeah

Posted by dupergreenie
Member since May 2014
10224 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 3:52 pm to
Having them in the cargo hold defeats the purpose of "emotional assistance"....
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122534 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 3:55 pm to


A fricking peacock.


Could you imagine if they let it on the flight and being the person who had to sit next to that?
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
98791 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 3:59 pm to
What a strange story.

Do you have to pay extra for a dog....or in this case a peacock, to fly by your feet?
Posted by jlovel7
NOT Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
24261 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

Do you have to pay extra for a dog....or in this case a peacock, to fly by your feet?


That's the whole point of labeling them as support animals. They get to skip these types of fees. What started of as something legitimate (yes I'm sure there are veterans or others out there who suffer from pretty severe trauma and having a pet with them helps alleviate that) has turned into shite tons of people essentially defrauding the system and trying to get around no pet/pay for pet policies. Or it's also people who really don't have the need for these animals but they've convinced themselves they do and we end up where we are today. With this type of ridiculousness.
Posted by VolsOut4Harambe
Baw Land
Member since Sep 2017
14932 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Hope she sues and wins. Its time for this to stop and no one can be the judge of what is quantifiable of "emotional support". Either all animals are or none are, you can't discriminate.


If you need “emotional support” to fly then you don’t need to be fricking flying in the first place. This is just a loophole people expose to ship their animals for free. This girl I know does it with her dog.

Shut up snowflake.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122534 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 4:22 pm to
quote:


That's the whole point of labeling them as support animals. They get to skip these types of fees. What started of as something legitimate (yes I'm sure there are veterans or others out there who suffer from pretty severe trauma and having a pet with them helps alleviate that) has turned into shite tons of people essentially defrauding the system and trying to get around no pet/pay for pet policies. Or it's also people who really don't have the need for these animals but they've convinced themselves they do and we end up where we are today. With this type of ridiculousness.


I would be curious to see how many people, who have been told they are not able to bring a support animal, still went on their flight.. In other words, I bet they still went on their flight, despite not having their "support animal".

It seems like the airlines would require a dog or.... A god damn peacock.. to have a certain type of certification.. Like the dogs blind people use. And a "support animal" doesn't seem like people NEED. As if.. They could use support, but they will make it if they don't have it.. It should be a "trauma animal" and like I said, should have a certain certification that says "this animal is appropriately trained to serve as this person's ____________".. Other than that, people who want to keep their animals with them during a flight has no sense of common courtesy.

That's what gets me about the whole thing. Think about the people you will sit by on the plane and before doing something, ask yourself if you would like it if the other people around you, were doing the things you are doing..
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62207 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

If you need “emotional support” to fly then you don’t need to be fricking flying in the first place.


Most of those people just have an emotional support Xanax or two.
Posted by jlovel7
NOT Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
24261 posts
Posted on 1/30/18 at 4:27 pm to
What I really don't understand is how a peacock fits itself into the cabin. It's not like a dog where it's about seat size (usually) and can be trained on how to behave. Does a peacock even have that level of intelligence or will it just do whatever the frick it wants whenever it wants to?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram