Started By
Message

re: Turning 40 sucks: Do these Vuity eye drops work if you don't want to get reading glasses?

Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:29 am to
Posted by selfgen
youngsville
Member since Aug 2006
1052 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:29 am to
quote:

Sounds to me like you’re a pussy.


Hmmm. I’m not too sure about that. Actually you sound more like of a pussy than he does.
This post was edited on 8/23/23 at 8:40 am
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11265 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:34 am to
I tried the vuity drops and it worked better than i expected. Its not for everybody, but early 40s with no distance correction is probably the best situation for it. It doesnt affect your lens like somebody said earlier, it constricts your pupils. So it would not be good to use at night, but you get about 8 hours out of it so probably enough to get through a work day if you dont do a ton of reading. It can give you some headaches at first when adjusting to it. Its not a perfect solution but good for some situations.

The funny thing is its just pilocarpine, which has been around forever for constricting pupils, which can improve near vision as a side effect. Somebody got smart and marketed it as a miracle reading vision cure under a new name and slightly different % and charging 5x more for it
This post was edited on 8/23/23 at 8:46 am
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33661 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:40 am to
Went to my first eye doctor appointment at 47, thinking I just needed something to help with reading/computer monitor. But otherwise, I was certain my vision was pretty good, driving et al...

Dr recommended something a little more "robust" for driving, reading, working,living, etc

First time I had them on, driving down the freeway, holy shite I had no idea how used to I had become of shite vision. You don't realize it
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
30637 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:42 am to
Have you tried eating carrots?
Posted by Notclamdip
Member since Mar 2023
940 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:48 am to
quote:

Please tell me you are not an actual eye dr.

There absolutely is a surgery for this.

That's the replacement of the lense with an artificial one, right?

My understanding of the 40+ readers thing is not the muscles around the lense, but the lense itself gets less flexible.

I'm 54 and well into a decade with readers. I hate and it and now even my far sight is going bad. I may have to break down and get real glasses.
Posted by highcotton2
Alabama
Member since Feb 2010
9479 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:03 am to
quote:

That's the replacement of the lense with an artificial one, right?


Two people I know had a mono vision laser surgery done. One eye is for near vision and the other is for distance. Sounds like it would be terrible but they both said it worked great after they got used to it. Now they don’t even think about it. They wore a contact in each eye for about a week to see if they would like it before the surgery. Said it took about 3 days to adjust.
Posted by REB BEER
Laffy Yet
Member since Dec 2010
16295 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:07 am to
quote:

I'm 46 and can see perfectly


Not for long
Posted by BMoney
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
16289 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:08 am to
Just get some cheap readers at Walgreens and keep several pairs around the house in spots you frequent. It's the new normal for you. Took me until I was 46 to figure out I needed to do that. If that's the worst thing to happen to you at 40, count your blessings.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43477 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Made it to almost 45 before I broke down and got some reading glasses. I'll go see the eye doctor at some point



I'm still fighting the good fight at 45, but quickly losing the battle.
Posted by 6R12
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
8821 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:23 am to
I have no clue, but the cataract surgery was life changing. Game changer for me. One eye was bad and had both done with the multi focus lens. UNBELIEVABLE
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
49092 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:29 am to
quote:

I'm still fighting the good fight at 45, but quickly losing the battle

It was like a light switch almost. I think I was mixing some Roundup and I couldn’t remember the ratio and realized I couldn't read shite on the back of that bottle anymore
This post was edited on 8/23/23 at 9:29 am
Posted by blueridgeTiger
Granbury, TX
Member since Jun 2004
20434 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:30 am to
You poor child. Enjoy what you have - you're only half way to my situation when things really fall apart.
Posted by Quatrepot
Member since Jun 2023
4117 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:33 am to
40? It’s about to rain pussy.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56663 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:35 am to
I had no issues at all at 40.

I felt 25. Could do anything. Vision perfect. No aches or pains.

50. Ok

52. It’s like a bomb if dysfunction went off. Random issues that are transient. God forbid I work on computer a few hours then go drive. Can’t read signs hardly. And forget being able to function w a head cold. I am down a day
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56663 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:38 am to
quote:

It doesnt affect your lens like somebody said earlier, it constricts your pupils.
this seems counterintuitive. My eyesight is dismal in low light. Forget reading a damn menu in a dim restaurant
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
14201 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:39 am to
quote:

selfgen
why you so hateful?
Posted by Pechon
unperson
Member since Oct 2011
7748 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:43 am to
quote:

My eyesight is dismal in low light.


Same. I've always worn glasses but a couple years ago got progressive lenses. I don't care and I know it sounds vain but there is no way I'm wearing bifocals in my 40s.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56663 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:51 am to
quote:

don't care and I know it sounds vain but there is no way I'm wearing bifocals in my 40s
I can get by without readers for 95 percent of my day. Some things are real trouble. Like tying light line in a small eye hook. I just suffer.

I have about 12 pairs of readers hidden around my house. I can never find em. If I had 50 I still wouldn’t have access. I am not prepared
Posted by rickgrimes
Member since Jan 2011
4181 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Or pay for LASIK if you’re eyes can benefit from it.

I already had Lasik done many years ago. My distant vision is fine. It is the upclose stuff that I have problem with, which comes from aging (presybyopia), and Lasik can't fix that.
Posted by rickgrimes
Member since Jan 2011
4181 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Just a heads up but I was 45 and my vision went from prefect to needing readers in a matter of about 3-4 weeks. It comes on pretty quick.


This! It seemingly happened overnight over a period of just a month for me.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram