- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tundra or F-150
Posted on 1/19/17 at 4:12 pm to HarrisLetsRide
Posted on 1/19/17 at 4:12 pm to HarrisLetsRide
GMC Sierra all day every day including sunday.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 4:16 pm to LNCHBOX
My last f150 had all the clear coat peel off at 4 years. Called in to Ford to see about resolution, they told me it was unique to mine cause I used it outside.
I made it into Wikipedia
I made it into Wikipedia
Posted on 1/19/17 at 4:18 pm to HarrisLetsRide
At any mention of the word "Tundra", Lunchbox will arrive like a roach flying to a lightbulb in the night.
The guy is truly pathological. I've never seen such obsessive hate for an inanimate object before anywhere else.
I've owned 3 Chevy trucks. My brother has owned a GMC and an Ecoboost F150. My father has had 2 Explorers and 2 Taurausi as company cars among a host of other vehicles (Pontiacs, a Pacifica, an 80s Audi, a huge Caddy convertible in the '70s, a 442 W-30). My mother has owned 3 Suburbans, 2 Expeditions an F150, and an Ecoboost Explorer. My Tundra has had the least problems of any of them (none). It's 10 years old, has never been parked in a garage, and I've only replaced brake pads, wipers, the battery (once), the belt (once) and tires and changed the oil. The original battery lasted 7 years. The original belt lasted 9 years. It has the original spark plugs in it. I've never changed the transmission fluid or opened the rear end. That's incredible. In my family this thing is legendary because it looks maybe 5 years old and has nothing wrong with it. Coming from nothing but domestic trucks, everyone else in my family fully expects a 10 year old vehicle to be a pile of crap.
The guy is truly pathological. I've never seen such obsessive hate for an inanimate object before anywhere else.
I've owned 3 Chevy trucks. My brother has owned a GMC and an Ecoboost F150. My father has had 2 Explorers and 2 Taurausi as company cars among a host of other vehicles (Pontiacs, a Pacifica, an 80s Audi, a huge Caddy convertible in the '70s, a 442 W-30). My mother has owned 3 Suburbans, 2 Expeditions an F150, and an Ecoboost Explorer. My Tundra has had the least problems of any of them (none). It's 10 years old, has never been parked in a garage, and I've only replaced brake pads, wipers, the battery (once), the belt (once) and tires and changed the oil. The original battery lasted 7 years. The original belt lasted 9 years. It has the original spark plugs in it. I've never changed the transmission fluid or opened the rear end. That's incredible. In my family this thing is legendary because it looks maybe 5 years old and has nothing wrong with it. Coming from nothing but domestic trucks, everyone else in my family fully expects a 10 year old vehicle to be a pile of crap.
This post was edited on 1/19/17 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 1/19/17 at 4:20 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:
At any mention of the word "Tundra", Lunchbox will arrive like a roach flying to a lightbulb in the night.
The guy is truly pathological. I've never seen such obsessive hate for an inanimate object before anywhere else.
This is a truly delicious melt.
Did you miss the post where I said they're both great trucks and for OP's purposes he could flip a coin? Nah, you're too busy going off your rocker.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 4:23 pm to LNCHBOX
You're the one who becomes hysterical anytime the longevity and quality of Tundras are mentioned.
Melt on, Melt-o-man.
Melt on, Melt-o-man.
This post was edited on 1/19/17 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 1/19/17 at 4:26 pm to Cooter Davenport
Pretty much the exact response I expected from you.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 4:30 pm to LNCHBOX
6.2 Denali, 5.0 F150, 5.7 Tundra, can't go wrong. It's all about your experience in the past what your preference is now. Love my 6.2 it's a beast.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 4:48 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
quote:
Years and years of reliability
And does the f150 not have this?
Not unless you are the type that trades in their vehicles every 5-6 years.
My Ford started having problems after 110,000 miles, which took us about 5-6 years to accumulate. I liked the truck because it looked nice and was comfortable....but durability, longevity, and resale are not things that Ford does well.
This post was edited on 1/19/17 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 1/19/17 at 5:02 pm to basiletiger
quote:
GMC Sierra all day every day including sunday.
For me, it would be between the Sierra or Tundra, but I'd probably also consider the new Titan.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 5:05 pm to member12
quote:
Not unless you are the type that trades in their vehicles every 5-6 years.
Again, anything to actually back that up?
quote:
My Ford started having problems after 110,000 miles, which took us about 5-6 years to accumulate. I liked the truck because it looked nice and was comfortable....but durability, longevity, and resale are not things that Ford does well.
Congrats on your sample size of 1.
ETA: I see the Toyota cult is out in full force downvoting
This post was edited on 1/19/17 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 1/19/17 at 5:36 pm to HarrisLetsRide
quote:
Looking for a used '12-'14 model.
Don't forget to check the vehicle history for body work before you buy and make sure it wasn't in an accident. You may want to discuss negotiation strategies on the money talk board if you have time.
quote:
I've been partial to Ford, but the Tundra has me intrigued since I want to own it for 10+ years at minimum.
In that case, the Toyota is the easy choice between the two. Fords tend to need work around the time most of their owners finish paying them off. A lot of them from that era have weird design flaws too, such as a 3V engine that would go through spark plugs pretty quickly and cost a small fortune and a lot of time to replace.
The problem with Toyota is that they are not as popular and their buyers tend to keep them a bit longer, so you'll have fewer selection to choose from as a used truck. Perhaps you would be well served by looking at a new mid sized truck as an alternative?
Posted on 1/19/17 at 5:46 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
If your number one concern is resale and longevity, you aren't going to beat the Tundra.
Is there anything besides anecdotes from Tundra owners to back this up?
NADA Perspective March 2014 - Light Duty Trucks
quote:
So, what exactly is depreciation? Simply put, depreciation is the loss in value associated with advancing age and mileage and it is by far the number one expense associated with vehicle ownership; viewed another way, a slower rate of depreciation leads to better retained value, or “retention,” over time.
quote:
With tremendous demand for large trucks among buyers, the average retention for the segment is high at 62.5%. Just as it is for mid-size trucks, Toyota is the segment leader for large pickups with its Tundra exhibiting a 71.6% retention rate
quote:
On the other hand, large half-ton pickups from Ford and General Motors are found to be not only well-liked, but also have extraordinary value retention as the group is currently retaining 63.1%
Posted on 1/19/17 at 6:22 pm to HarrisLetsRide
Owned a 2013 ecoboost F150 and now own a 2016 Tundra. Had issues at 50K with the F150. Traded and love the Tundra.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 6:23 pm to lsufan1971
quote:
Owned a 2013 ecoboost F150 and now own a 2016 Tundra. Had issues at 50K with the F150. Traded and love the Tundra.
I've read more posts like this than I ever care to. It's why I went with the 5.0.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 6:24 pm to OceanMan
I'm talking more about the longevity. No one seems to have any thing to back that up.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 6:40 pm to HarrisLetsRide
FYI. According to this study, the highest % total of the following vehicles have over 200,000 miles on the odometer. It's mostly trucks...particularly GM and Toyota trucks.
LINK
Ford F-250 Super Duty 4.2%
Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD 3.6%
Chevrolet Suburban 3.6%
Toyota 4Runner 3.5%
Ford Expedition 3.0%
GMC Sierra 2500HD 2.7%
Chevrolet Tahoe 2.1%
GMC Yukon XL 1.9%
Toyota Sequoia 1.7%
GMC Sierra 1500 1.6%
GMC Yukon 1.6%
Honda Accord 1.6%
Dodge Durango 1.5%
Subaru Legacy 1.5%
Toyota Tacoma 1.5%
LINK
Ford F-250 Super Duty 4.2%
Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD 3.6%
Chevrolet Suburban 3.6%
Toyota 4Runner 3.5%
Ford Expedition 3.0%
GMC Sierra 2500HD 2.7%
Chevrolet Tahoe 2.1%
GMC Yukon XL 1.9%
Toyota Sequoia 1.7%
GMC Sierra 1500 1.6%
GMC Yukon 1.6%
Honda Accord 1.6%
Dodge Durango 1.5%
Subaru Legacy 1.5%
Toyota Tacoma 1.5%
Posted on 1/19/17 at 6:49 pm to crispyUGA
quote:I've done it a few with my gas 04 2500HD without a problem
We have a couple of 3500s with gas engines and it's down right scary to get them out on the interstate with a 5 ton trailer and a small skid steer
Posted on 1/19/17 at 7:03 pm to Hammertime
As long as it ain't a Dodge, Honda, or Nissan you are doing just fine.
My viewpoint (which is worth a shite ton):
GM - looks
Ford - most fun to drive
Toyota - durability/resale
Can't go wrong with those 3. I'm shallow as hell so I went with the GM.
My viewpoint (which is worth a shite ton):
GM - looks
Ford - most fun to drive
Toyota - durability/resale
Can't go wrong with those 3. I'm shallow as hell so I went with the GM.
Posted on 1/19/17 at 7:08 pm to CoachRobertson
Here you go Coach, I cut off all the personal details. You must be a salesman here in Louisiana, you boys play little league ball here bc you got the market locked up with limited dealerships. Texas dealerships play big boy ball. Oh sorry it's 6k not 7. Anyways it's more than your frick the buyer 3k, Oh yea BTW that's a 50k Limited Homeboy.
This post was edited on 1/19/17 at 7:10 pm
Popular
Back to top


1







