- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Treasury secretary says ‘we will see’ about $2,000 rebate checks
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:47 am
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:47 am
quote:
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that President Donald Trump’s proposal to issue $2,000 tariff rebate checks to most Americans would require Congress’ approval.
“We will see. We need legislation for that,” Bessent said on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” when asked about rebate checks, adding that “Those could go out.”
Trump has repeatedly suggested using tariffs to fund rebate checks in recent months, including in a Truth Social post last weekend. “People that are against Tariffs are FOOLS! … A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone,” he wrote. Trump first floated the idea of Americans potentially receiving a portion of the tariff revenue in July.
The payments would be “for working families” and would have an income limit, Bessent said Sunday.
But the Supreme Court could strike down a large chunk of Trump’s tariffs when it decides on the president’s use of an emergency law. The court appeared deeply concerned earlier this month with Trump’s reliance on the law, with several conservative justices picking apart the administration’s position.
The tariffs have faced scrutiny for contributing to higher inflation on consumer goods, though Bessent and others in Trump’s economic team have denied that tariffs are essentially a tax on American consumers.
“I don’t think this ruling is going to go against us, but if it does, what’s (the Supreme Court’s) plan for refunds? Because how is this going to get to consumers? Are they just going to hand some of these importers big windfalls?” Bessent said Sunday.
LINK
Wonder what the income limit will be.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:49 am to ragincajun03
Im sure there will be a requirement to have actually paid taxes to recieve this, right?
Right?
Right?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:49 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Wonder what the income limit will be.
I bet it would be the same as the "stimulus" checks, Single 75, Married 150
Posted on 11/17/25 at 7:57 am to ragincajun03
quote:
The payments would be “for working families” and would have an income limit,
So above a certain limit, are we not considered a ‘working family’???
Posted on 11/17/25 at 8:01 am to ragincajun03
We need adults deciding this. It is irresponsible governing to not focus on the national debt.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 8:02 am to jpainter6174
quote:
Wonder what the income limit will be.
quote:
I bet it would be the same as the "stimulus" checks, Single 75, Married 150
I think the limit will be $100K.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 8:03 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Treasury secretary says ‘we will see what our midterm polling numbers look like’ about $2,000 rebate checks
Posted on 11/17/25 at 8:04 am to ragincajun03
quote:
The payments would be “for working families” and would have an income limit,
Working family here. Definitely will not get shite. Just get to keep paying.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 8:05 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
I think the limit will be $100K.
So anybody currently receiving the majority of benefit from government services but proportionally contributing less will benefit.
Populism is just liberalism with a fresh coat of paint.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 8:06 am to BabyTac
quote:
So above a certain limit, are we
You’ll be fine, you’ll get your stimulus check. The rest of us probably make too much.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 8:06 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Im sure there will be a requirement to have actually paid taxes to recieve this, right?
I wish.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 8:08 am to ragincajun03
Blatant vote buying ahead of 2026. Trump 2.0 sucks.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 8:13 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Im sure there will be a requirement to have actually paid taxes to recieve this, right?
One would think so. What happened to paying down the national debt?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 8:14 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
I think the limit will be $100K.
kind of joke of number to be considered "high earning"
100k is 78k in 2019 dollars
Posted on 11/17/25 at 8:14 am to KWL85
quote:
We need adults deciding this.
Well lucky for you, the adults are now in charge. Or was that last administration and Congress? Or the one before? Or the one before that?
Hell if I know.
This post was edited on 11/17/25 at 8:16 am
Posted on 11/17/25 at 9:26 am to YouKnowImRight
quote:
So anybody currently receiving the majority of benefit from government services but proportionally contributing less will benefit.
Pretty much. And it will probably be wasted on useless shite. I’d bet anything that if these $2,000 checks do go out, the vast majority of people who get one will, within two weeks, have blown through all of it an will have absolutely nothing of worth to show for it.
This post was edited on 11/17/25 at 9:27 am
Posted on 11/17/25 at 9:29 am to ragincajun03
They're "dividends," remember?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:14 am to ragincajun03
What a terribly worded thread title
Posted on 11/17/25 at 10:15 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
I think the limit will be $100K.
Single or Married?
Popular
Back to top

32










