- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Titanic tourist submarine goes missing
Posted on 6/23/23 at 9:08 pm to LegendInMyMind
Posted on 6/23/23 at 9:08 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Did it go to the Titanic a dozen times or not?
What difference does that make?
Did it come back up every time it went down?
Posted on 6/23/23 at 9:28 pm to dallastigers
quote:
W]e understand from inside the community that they had dropped their ascent weights and they were coming up, trying to manage an emergency.”
I saw him say that last night. Wonder when (or if) we’ll ever get confirmation of that.
Posted on 6/23/23 at 10:34 pm to dallastigers
quote:so baffled by this... how do people like Nargeolet and Harding get in a vessel like the Titan? the Frenchman served in the Navy for 25 years and had made over 30 dives to the Titanic. Harding worked in a different field that is heavily regulated while taking trips to the Challenger Deep as a hobby. Both of these guys were familiar with safety requirements and protocol. Dawood was reportedly a huge Titanic fan and surely knew about voyages to the wreckage. Regardless, people in these respective positions aren't where they are because of decisions like this.
Harding descended to Challenger Deep in 2021 on the Limiting Factor
also, how long should it take for a submariner to know they're descending too fast? was the first part of the dive fine before the acceleration occurred or can signs of unplanned descent be detected at a safer depth? would a 5 man crew have anything to do with this? seems like Rush just wanted as many paying customers as he could get on this trip.
This post was edited on 6/23/23 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 6/23/23 at 10:42 pm to Soda City Spur
quote:
how do people like Nargeolet and Harding get in a vessel like this?
His face during 3.0 a few days before while signing the flag showed it all
Posted on 6/24/23 at 12:56 am to Soda City Spur
Maybe this should be a form of Capital punishment..
It's more terrifying than lethal injection, yet probably more humaine. But it gives the condemned a long time on the way down to remember why they were there, as it gets darker and darker.
It's a guaranteed kill, and feels more of a possible crime deterrent than the chair, gas chamber or etc.
It's more terrifying than lethal injection, yet probably more humaine. But it gives the condemned a long time on the way down to remember why they were there, as it gets darker and darker.
It's a guaranteed kill, and feels more of a possible crime deterrent than the chair, gas chamber or etc.
Posted on 6/24/23 at 1:10 am to jdd48
quote:
Yea, but questions were raised about safety since the first trials even according to James Cameron.
So if you do it successfully three times, and people say, “well it might not be safe”
What are you supposed to do? Real life trials were successful. Tests and ratings were successful. What do you do?
Posted on 6/24/23 at 1:11 am to terd ferguson
quote:
And we absolutely kept track of the number of dives. I was on a boat that hit 1,000 dives (and surfaces... thankfully).
We use a specific metal to construct the pressure vessel (HY-80/HY-100) and there are tons of regulations and procedures to ensure we keep water out of "the people tank".
And this same if not MORE rigorous testing is applied to EVERY pressurized vessel of notable size at any plant/refinery/mill in the United States.
These expensive tests and certifications are closely monitored and audited by several agencies.
That dude running OceanGate didn't have time for that nonsense.
Can't make this shite up.
"at some point, safety is just pure waste." - Stockton Rush
Posted on 6/24/23 at 1:11 am to Smeg
quote:
What does that matter, when each subsequent attempt is less safe than the previous?
What showed that later tests were less safe?
Posted on 6/24/23 at 7:10 am to mikelbr
quote:
"at some point, safety is just pure waste." - Stockton Rush
Died doing what he loved then
Posted on 6/24/23 at 7:18 am to TackySweater
I think these sub passengers are probably getting more ridicule than they deserve across social media because of their wealth and the price tag to do this being $250,000, which is 5-6 times what the average American earns in a year, and that a lot of people would be too afraid to try something like this that actually would have been a pretty cool experience for those with the audacity to do it.
There at least three Titanic museums in the US and the ship is the setting for one of the highest grossing movies of all time. It is by far the most famous ship ever built. To see its bow (which won’t be there too much longer) with your own eyes in such a remote location would have to be incredible. In spite of this incident, I would do it tomorrow if I could go on the kind of subs James Cameron has used on his 30+ dives to the wreck.
Yes, indications seem to be that the submersible they used was of questionable quality, although I do believe it made a few successful dives to the Titanic before this incident.
They got reckless and fricked up and it cost them their lives. But how many of us have driven 100+ mph or otherwise put our lives at risk unnecessarily for a hell of a lot less than a once in a lifetime opportunity?
There at least three Titanic museums in the US and the ship is the setting for one of the highest grossing movies of all time. It is by far the most famous ship ever built. To see its bow (which won’t be there too much longer) with your own eyes in such a remote location would have to be incredible. In spite of this incident, I would do it tomorrow if I could go on the kind of subs James Cameron has used on his 30+ dives to the wreck.
Yes, indications seem to be that the submersible they used was of questionable quality, although I do believe it made a few successful dives to the Titanic before this incident.
They got reckless and fricked up and it cost them their lives. But how many of us have driven 100+ mph or otherwise put our lives at risk unnecessarily for a hell of a lot less than a once in a lifetime opportunity?
Posted on 6/24/23 at 7:44 am to Globetrotter747
Here is a well done documentary from the BBC, from a few months ago(?), about Oceans Gate and Titan. It made successful dives to the Titanic before. They were doing research as well. It wasn't just Billionaires going to the Titanic.
Each dive had issues it seems.
Take Me to the Titanic
Each dive had issues it seems.
Take Me to the Titanic
This post was edited on 6/24/23 at 8:02 am
Posted on 6/24/23 at 8:14 am to SEClint
quote:
Maybe this should be a form of Capital punishment.. It's more terrifying than lethal injection, yet probably more humaine. But it gives the condemned a long time on the way down to remember why they were there, as it gets darker and darker. It's a guaranteed kill, and feels more of a possible crime deterrent than the chair, gas chamber or etc
shite would be expensive after a while and would litter the ocean with trash
Posted on 6/24/23 at 8:56 am to Globetrotter747
quote:
I think these sub passengers are probably getting more ridicule than they deserve across social media
I don't
quote:
They got reckless and fricked up and it cost them their lives.
Same reason we ridicule many absurd deaths.
Saw this in a submariner group and it's an excellent explanation of the "frick those retards" mentality...
"Ok, a lot of people seem bothered by some of us with dark, macabre humor regarding the loss of a billionaire s toy at 10,000 feet while engaging in a dark, macabre entertainment of viewing the site of another wreck caused by Hubris.
Hubris, meet Nemesis .
So here's a point of view. We trained hard and constantly to operate safely in a lethally dangerous environment. We did it for serious reasons other than being a bored rich guy. After multiple disasters costing the lives of our brothers, time and money and skull sweat went into making our boats safer. Even so, we worked in that dangerous place where death was one mistake away. We dealt with it with a dark, twisted humor.
Along comes Richie Rich, and spits on us, scoffs at the safety which was second nature to us, brags about how he disregarded safety and broke the rules we mere mortal engineers found necessary.
Nature, red of claw and beak, enforced the rules of physics, and brought the inevitable end to such damn foolishness as always.
No sailor ever takes pleasure in a death at sea. No Submariner takes pleasure in a death beneath the waves which could have taken us at any moment.
But if you expect Submariners not to engage in dark humor when Nemesis comes for Hubris, and such stupidity takes its inevitable toll, I submit you know nothing about Submariners.
And maybe, just maybe, the next guy who wants to build a toy Submersible will not break the rules, and live."
Posted on 6/24/23 at 8:56 am to YNWA
Here's a YouTube video a guy that was on the ship with the deceased and supposed to go down 2 missions before the accident. A weather window canceled his dive, it shows the launch boat and shows some of the problems that seemed to pop up often.
They even ask paying passengers if they want to help diagnose the computer not linking up with the motor controls. That alone would send red flags.
YT
They even ask paying passengers if they want to help diagnose the computer not linking up with the motor controls. That alone would send red flags.
YT
This post was edited on 6/24/23 at 9:10 am
Posted on 6/24/23 at 8:56 am to riverdiver
quote:
Did it go to the Titanic a dozen times or not?
quote:
What difference does that make?
The carbon fiber hull got weaker and weaker with each dive and they were clearly not monitoring the hull integrity properly after each dive, so eventually this thing was going to go implode.
Posted on 6/24/23 at 8:59 am to TackySweater
quote:
What are you supposed to do? Real life trials were successful. Tests and ratings were successful.
Do you mean real life trials were successful because it went to the design depth a few times and didn’t implode? There’s this crazy engineering term called cyclic fatigue. Materials fail over time when stress is applied, removed, applied, etc. Carbon fiber is NOT viable because it happened to work a few times. There’s a reason this isn’t used elsewhere in compression.
quote:
What do you do?
Not using a material where you can’t check its structural integrity because it’s a composite would be a start. Maybe use what every other submersible uses - titanium or steel.
Posted on 6/24/23 at 8:59 am to SEClint
I’ve had this thought as well. But then just attach a weight to their ankle and throw them in.
Posted on 6/24/23 at 9:01 am to Globetrotter747
quote:
I think these sub passengers are probably getting more ridicule than they deserve across social media
Exactly.
Bunch of twits who are afraid to step out of their house without a mask criticizing people who are risk takers.
Posted on 6/24/23 at 9:04 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Bunch of twits who are afraid to step out of their house without a mask criticizing people who are risk takers
What a fricking retarded statement
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News