- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/14/17 at 10:47 am to L1C4
I'd need an extra 2 just for my stuff
Posted on 10/14/17 at 10:47 am to L1C4
Real issue is these are trailers, not homes. They depreciate in value instead of increasing in value over time. It's a poor investment of your money if you pay a lot for it
Posted on 10/14/17 at 10:48 am to Restomod
I am jealous when they are Pacific Northwest or some mountains
Would want plumbing and 2 - one sleeper and one living area
Would want plumbing and 2 - one sleeper and one living area
Posted on 10/14/17 at 10:48 am to L1C4
I heard that everything like carpet and furniture wears out very quickly and the clutter becomes a big problem.
Posted on 10/14/17 at 10:49 am to Restomod
If u have snuff acreage u can use an outhouse.
Posted on 10/14/17 at 10:49 am to L1C4
I was watching a documentary called the minimalists on Netflix. There are some really cool apartment and house designs on there that are actually livable. These tiny houses are not a long-term plan. They are hipster dreams which most likely last six months.
Posted on 10/14/17 at 10:52 am to PrimeTime Money
quote:
Those pieces of crap are excessively and unnecessarily small.
You can build them like houses, on foundations...just smaller. The trailers are some hipster thing.
Posted on 10/14/17 at 10:54 am to RogerTheShrubber
Why not just build a traditional home that's like 1100 sq ft? My wife and I could live in that once the kids are gone. Unfortunately those types of areas turn ghetto down here. It would have to be built on our own land.
Posted on 10/14/17 at 10:57 am to RogerTheShrubber
My local habitat for humanity converted a metal shipping container 4 someone
Posted on 10/14/17 at 10:57 am to jdeval1
No way the wife and I could live in one of those. We both snore, loudly, when we're in a snoring mode. Hell, when we rent a motel room we have to rent a mini-suite just so I have a couch in another room to go sleep on.
Posted on 10/14/17 at 10:58 am to L1C4
Tiny house on a badass piece of land= livin
Posted on 10/14/17 at 10:58 am to jdeval1
This or just get a 25 to 30 foot pull-behind camper. The idea of a tiny house is great but when you look past the novelty of it there are better options
Posted on 10/14/17 at 11:03 am to jdeval1
quote:
Why not just build a traditional home that's like 1100 sq ft?
Smaller is less expensive and easier to maintain.
Lived in a small cabin for a summer a few years ago and loved it. It was probably less than 400 sq ft.
Posted on 10/14/17 at 11:03 am to L1C4
Hold on, let me ask my personal architect and get back to you.
Posted on 10/14/17 at 11:05 am to L1C4
They've had tiny houses for years. It's called a single wide.
Posted on 10/14/17 at 11:05 am to RogerTheShrubber
My wife talked me into buying a 2900 sq ft home. It's a big waste of space for the most part. We will definitely downsize after my girls (both 11 now) leave. I'm good with a small place in Eastern TN or Western NC. I don't think she'd go for 400sq ft though.
This post was edited on 10/14/17 at 11:12 am
Posted on 10/14/17 at 11:07 am to L1C4
Just a means to get people accustomed to to the idea of being herded into cities for the environment's sake per UN Agenda 21.
Posted on 10/14/17 at 11:10 am to L1C4
Posted on 10/14/17 at 11:11 am to Jake88
Yeah I watched soylent green again the other night. Luv that movie!
Popular
Back to top



2






