Started By
Message

re: The Top 10 Bloodiest Battles of the Second World War

Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:44 pm to
Posted by sledgehammer
SWLA
Member since Oct 2020
7196 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Japan did a number on them before they turned their attention to us.

They never stopped though. When Japan surrendered in ‘45, many Japanese army generals were pissed off because they were still winning and kicking China’s butt.
Posted by SpotCheckBilly
Member since May 2020
8518 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

I did a quick Internet search which showed over 27 million casualties for the Russians, which is combined number of the civilian and military population.


That's more than the current population of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia.
Posted by WWII Collector
Member since Oct 2018
9025 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

American high schools do an absolutely appalling job of teaching history. It’s nothing but names and dates, very little impact of actions and events.

When we covered WWII in American history, we barely even touched on the fricking pacific theater. We focused on D Day and the European battles a little bit and then jumped straight into civil rights. I swear I’ve learned more about ancient and American history through listening to hardcore history and the revolutions podcast, hearing something, and researching it than all of my time in high school



Just a story... Had an eccentric teacher once. Out of the clear blue one day he put a small piece of chalk on his desk. The he took a huge book and slammed it on the desk obliterating the chalk... "KABAM"... " AND that" he said, "Was what the Russians did to the Germans at Stalingrad."...
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
20252 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

over 27 million casualties for the Russians


Which is why they dgaf. Hard to have respect for human life with so much death. Would take a strong faith not to become the ultimate nihilist.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80885 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

5. Battle of Moscow (September 30, 1941-January 7, 1942) - 1,354,234 total casualties

The German Army's drive on Moscow is stopped just miles short of the gates of Moscow and pushed back by a massive Soviet counteroffensive. Prior to the Soviet attack, advanced German units could easily see the spires of Moscow through their binoculars.


World might be better off if the Germans took Moscow, Stalin committed suicide or "committed suicide", the Soviet government collapsed, and Russian partisans cut off the German supply lines so the occupiers starved/froze.

Basically, Hitler and Stalin both lose bigly.
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
11102 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:08 pm to
We have to understand that Asians and that includes Russians have different values regarding human life. China is willing to lose millions in a war with the US and we are not. Russia being also an Asian country is also willing to put up with much higher casualties than the US.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
55981 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:10 pm to
Why do you think China and Russia are posturing
Population control
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
25574 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:15 pm to
Both the wars did significant damage to the population of white people. Combined, they killed around 60 million Europeans.
Posted by tiger chaser
Birmingham Ala
Member since Feb 2008
7721 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:19 pm to
You need to check the stats on the Battle of Attu….
Posted by tiger chaser
Birmingham Ala
Member since Feb 2008
7721 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:21 pm to
Yep…look at Battle of Attu
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71149 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

Did we do this for the First World War?



No. However, it is more difficult to score civilian casualties in the First World War, particularly when it comes to attributing their deaths to battle. Most civilian deaths in the First World War were the result of famine and disease. The Armenian genocide and the various German and Austrian atrocities in both Belgium and Serbia notwithstanding, civilians typically weren't seen by the various militaries as legitimate targets in World War I as they were in World War II.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71149 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

Ever think of posting comparisons of major battles through time?



Thanks for the compliments. And I could definitely do that in the future.
Posted by CarrolltonTiger
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2005
50291 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

When we covered WWII in American history, we barely even touched on the fricking pacific theater. We focused on D Day and the European battles a little bit and then jumped straight into civil rights.



Nothing stops you from independent reading. If American history was thorough you'd never sniff WII.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39857 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

American high schools do an absolutely appalling job of teaching history. It’s nothing but names and dates, very little impact of actions and events.

When we covered WWII in American history, we barely even touched on the fricking pacific theater. We focused on D Day and the European battles a little bit and then jumped straight into civil rights.
It goes to show how propaganda is always in play. Every country needs to believe its own story that it tells itself. Most Americans grew up believing D-Day was the heroic, yet catastrophic singular act that defined WWII. In reality, it was mostly clean-up work against 2nd and 3rd rate soldiers (many of them foreign conscripts) that weren't good enough for the Ostfront.
Posted by EarlDibblesJr
Big Thicket
Member since Oct 2020
358 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 11:41 pm to
The Eastern Front was an absolute bloodbath. Hitler's big blunder. He was too greedy. Overruled his generals advice. Couldn't secure Moscow before winter set in.

Then he wouldn't allow retreat in crucial moments. You have large encirclement and slaughter. The Front was so large it was also difficult not to be constantly flanked.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
23530 posts
Posted on 3/9/23 at 12:18 am to
quote:

These casualties are from mostly defending their homeland. On all sides.

We are lucky to never have gotten to that point.
Yeah, from what I remember learning, part of the reason France tapped out so early was that they remembered the attrition from WW1 and wanted no part of that again. As I recall, they also misread the politics in Germany, and didn't think the Nazis were going to be as bad as they were. And they, in turn, had the worst sort of politicians running things at the time.

Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
33618 posts
Posted on 3/9/23 at 12:37 am to
quote:

The Eastern Front was an absolute bloodbath.
If you want to read a great biography by a German soldier that somehow survived the Eastern Front, read this.

The Forgotten Soldier
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
73080 posts
Posted on 3/9/23 at 3:19 am to
quote:


When we covered WWII in American history, we barely even touched on the fricking pacific theater. We focused on D Day and the European battles a little bit and then jumped straight into civil rights.



Nothing stops you from independent reading. If American history was thorough you'd never sniff WII.


This.

The problem with teaching history in school is you don't have infinite amounts of time to give every topic the respect it deserves. Every time a major historical event happens(9/11, covid, etc.), you have to chose between either teaching that or getting rid of something else.

It's the only basic school subject that is in a state of constant growth.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
28284 posts
Posted on 3/9/23 at 5:18 am to
quote:

27 million Russians dead


Where is this number from?

You do know casualties include deaths along with injury and illness, correct?
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71149 posts
Posted on 3/9/23 at 6:46 am to
quote:

Where is this number from?


It’s an accurate number. Tens of millions of Soviet military and civilian personnel were casualties of war from 1939-1945, but of that number - 27 million were killed outright. About 11.5 million soldiers were killed in combat or died in German POW and concentration camps. The remainder of them were civilian deaths, mostly victims of the Holocaust or anti-Bolshevik pogroms.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram