Started By
Message

re: The Tank Museum unveils the world’s only running Königstiger

Posted on 7/1/25 at 12:02 am to
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
13623 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 12:02 am to
quote:

The success of the US army is for every person on the battlefield, 19 people support and supply them.


During WWII my ex father in law was a teen when their rice farm near Jenning had German POWs hired out to them for the harvest. The Germans had never seen so much food in their life at lunch and were miserable working in the afternoon adter gorging themselves on the spread the women laid out. One German who spoke English told them there was no way to beat the Americans with such resources.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
49724 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 1:09 am to
I built both those two
Posted by bountyhunter
North of Houston a bit
Member since Mar 2012
6953 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 1:20 am to
Like most German vehicles, they were over-engineered comparative to their American and Soviet counterparts. I watched a video the other day talking about the T-34's redesign having a simple self-correcting feature built into their treads that would knock errant pins back into place as they rotate. This allowed mechanics to service tanks' treads faster in the field, whereas German tanks had a much more intricate design to keep the pins on.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
49724 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 3:09 am to
I was a big model builder when I was a kid and built 100s of them, pretty much everything that was in WW2, and overall the German shite was way cooler. It may have been too complicated etc but their tanks were vastly superior, their planes were awesome too but we could match them all except for the ME 262 which was decades ahead of its time.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
79603 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 3:45 am to
quote:

But they were a nightmare to maintain.


Complex engineering is a key drawback when your opponents are engineering for simple mass production.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
79603 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:56 am to
quote:

The Imperial German Army was arguably the best army of the modern era.


Finest fighting force ever put together.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
72545 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 4:58 am to
quote:

But they were a nightmare to maintain. Their powertrain was inadequate for their size, leading to frequent breakdowns.
Twin turbos and a supercharger on a 4 cylinder block.

My, how the past conceptually repeats itself.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31239 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:50 am to
The Bovington Tank Museum is an excellent follow on Facebook. They do a ton of social media and their collection literally has no equal.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
19809 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:21 am to
Awesome! Although I like the Tiger better, still awesome to see it running.

Show us your builds!
This post was edited on 7/1/25 at 7:23 am
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39151 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

If you have another contender, I’m very willing to listen to your arguments


I’m asking for your argument, which you haven’t provided.

quote:

But in my over 40 years of deep and extensive study of military history ranging from pre-Roman times to today


Not this again.

quote:

I still contend the Imperial German Army, especially in 1914, was, in its time, arguably the best army of the 20th century.


Great, make your argument instead of repeating the same spiel about your extensive expertise. Prove it for once.
Posted by DakIsNoLB
Member since Sep 2015
1234 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Complex engineering is a key drawback when your opponents are engineering for simple mass production.



Germany had no hope of matching Allied production. They thought a qualitative edge could help offset this.
Posted by DakIsNoLB
Member since Sep 2015
1234 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

As a fighting force, I feel the Wehrmacht of the Second World War is vastly overrated.



Aside from obvious leadership issues (Hitler), their deficiencies were a lack of logistics, oil supplies, and war machine manufacturing. Properly supplied and equipped formations that had what they needed to execute combined arms operations were incredibly tough to beat. They would have been scary had they had Allied productivity and logistics, but if ifs and buts were candy and nuts...

And you said Germany had only one adversary on the continent until Normandy. While not on the continent, North Africa was a huge front that soaked up resources that could have been used in Russia, and then the invasion of Italy happened in late 1943. That contributed to calling off the Operation Zitadelle (Kursk salient).
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
18879 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

1 Tiger cost 25 T-34's (more or less)


"Quantity has a quality all its own." -Nikita Khrushchev.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram