- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Secret Service didn’t give Trump counter snipers for TWO YEARS until the Butler Rally
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:57 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:57 pm to OMLandshark
I don’t know why anyone could argue with a straight faced that it’s inconceivable that this was an inside job. That if the feds weren’t in on it, they at least willfully allowed the shooter a good chance of getting the kill. Dems tried to impeach Trump on demonstrably false accusations. In normal circumstances this would be called a coup or possibly even treason. Then they tried to put him in jail on bullshite charges in a targeted persecution, orchestrated by Dems in a Dem city with a Dem judge. He didn’t go to jail so…simply killing him is the logical next step.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:59 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Can you fricking read? My subject was “If this isn’t happening, then Laura Loomer should never be taken seriously again.”
Yes, I read ~9 days ago you thought she actually had any credibility.
quote:
Me posting about that and saying take it with a grain of salt doesn’t mean shite.
Nothing you say means shite
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:00 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
He wasn’t the official nominee either that Saturday, so no.
That what I’m saying…is it customary for candidates who aren’t yet the official nominee to get full SS protection? Did Trump get less protection than a similarly situated candidate? I don’t know so I’m asking.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:02 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
Yes, I read ~9 days ago you thought she actually had any credibility.
Go look down the post where I call her a nutcase several times. You’re fricking liar.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:17 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
in a BlackRock commercial
Time to pull off a grand, decade long conspiracy to kill a president - let’s not forget to leave clues for OML first
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:25 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Time to pull off a grand, decade long conspiracy to kill a president - let’s not forget to leave clues for OML first
Fortune: Trump shooter was once featured in a BlackRock ad
And if you don’t see the problem with that, you either don’t know what BlackRock is or you’re a retard.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:26 pm to Lush
quote:I know, that was wordy AF OG, FR FR no cap
You should try Xanax.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:51 pm to LPTReb
“ The counter snipers were there to make sure the shooter couldn’t talk afterward”.
I think you called it right.
Initially,I just thought it was just a frick up by the SS.I just hard a hard time believing the SS was corrupt and would participate in an assassanation.
At this point it ‘s pretty obvious this was a CIA/FBI operation and the SS was involved.
That Crooks guy was given ample opportunity to kill Trump.But by the grace of God or luck,whatever you want to call it,Trump only recieved a flesh wound.
I’m sure it never occurred to Crooks that he was going to get whacked as part of the plan.No telling what he was promised.
Our country is in a seriously bad place.
I think you called it right.
Initially,I just thought it was just a frick up by the SS.I just hard a hard time believing the SS was corrupt and would participate in an assassanation.
At this point it ‘s pretty obvious this was a CIA/FBI operation and the SS was involved.
That Crooks guy was given ample opportunity to kill Trump.But by the grace of God or luck,whatever you want to call it,Trump only recieved a flesh wound.
I’m sure it never occurred to Crooks that he was going to get whacked as part of the plan.No telling what he was promised.
Our country is in a seriously bad place.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:57 pm to LSUA 75
quote:
At this point it ‘s pretty obvious this was a CIA/FBI operation and the SS was involved.
Certainly possible and wouldn’t surprise me. But really, it doesn’t require a vast complex conspiracy. All it takes is a few well placed people to allow a threat. They didn’t have to cause Crooks to show up with a rifle, they just needed to let him squeeze off some shots before taking action.
Posted on 8/3/24 at 12:07 am to biglego
quote:
They didn’t have to cause Crooks to show up with a rifle, they just needed to let him squeeze off some shots before taking action.
So Crooks just happens to show up the first time Trump has been given counter snipers in two years? Or maybe they knew that Crooks was going to show up, and they were told to stand down until he shot the President?
Keep in mind it was a member of the local police that found Crooks a minute before the assassination attempt (not to mention dozens of Trump supporters two minutes and one second before the shots were fired) and not the Secret Service.
With this new bit of information, it seems more likely that the counter snipers were there for two reasons:
A) To cover their asses when people ask “why weren’t there any counter snipers?”
B) To kill the shooter, who is almost certainly MKUltra, to prevent him from talking.
This post was edited on 8/3/24 at 12:13 am
Posted on 8/3/24 at 12:36 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Why after years of no Secret Service counter-snipers, did they show up in Butler?
Because
1) he isn’t entitled or have they ever been given the same level of SS protection as the president. You typically get just a couple of SS bodyguards as a former president and that’s it. That isn’t a Trump thing. That’s an everyone thing.
2) Protections for all major candidates ramp up in the lead up to the national convention for both parties, increasing the closer to election. This designation doesn’t happen within the SS either, but by Congress.
This post was edited on 8/3/24 at 12:37 am
Posted on 8/3/24 at 12:43 am to Havoc
Calm down.. The governmwnt would never kill one of our own. We are all Americans.. Trump., Biden.. Hariris.. They may disagree but they All bleed red white and blue!!
Posted on 8/3/24 at 12:59 am to Volvagia
You’re an idiot if you believe that.
Posted on 8/3/24 at 1:04 am to OMLandshark
Typically I’m not into conspiracy theories. I will just add that at my commencement ceremony Bush and Francois Mitterrand (President of France) both spoke.
They shut down a highway overpass next to the stadium, they had visible snipers on the roofs of the surrounding dorms and we could hardly hear because there were helos in the air the entire time.
All of these years later they don’t have drones?
A rooftop within 150 yards isn’t secured?
Extremely gross negligence at the very least.
They shut down a highway overpass next to the stadium, they had visible snipers on the roofs of the surrounding dorms and we could hardly hear because there were helos in the air the entire time.
All of these years later they don’t have drones?
A rooftop within 150 yards isn’t secured?
Extremely gross negligence at the very least.
Posted on 8/3/24 at 1:50 am to TheRouxGuru
quote:It's highly concerning to say the least...
The fact that nobody gives a frick about this anymore is kind of concerning
I think deep down many leftists and progressives wished the bullet would not have missed...
Posted on 8/3/24 at 2:18 am to OMLandshark
quote:
We all know that Crooks was MKUltra or whatever the CIA rebranded it internally as. Nothing else makes sense.
You can’t actually believe this
Posted on 8/3/24 at 5:04 am to OMLandshark
It’s not “believe”
It’s literal law.
You seriously think you have snipers following Clinton or Obama around whenever they visit a city?
Even in the first couple years after?
I get you became an expert in the past 2 weeks by reading tweets that made you feel good though.
It’s literal law.
You seriously think you have snipers following Clinton or Obama around whenever they visit a city?
Even in the first couple years after?
I get you became an expert in the past 2 weeks by reading tweets that made you feel good though.
This post was edited on 8/3/24 at 5:04 am
Posted on 8/3/24 at 5:05 am to WalkonQB
quote:
I will just add that at my commencement ceremony Bush and Francois Mitterrand (President of France) both spoke.
They shut down a highway overpass next to the stadium, they had visible snipers on the roofs of the surrounding dorms and we could hardly hear because there were helos in the air the entire time.
You have never seen a former president or potential candidate being treated with the same security as the current one.
Not even same. Not even within the same order of magnitude
This post was edited on 8/3/24 at 5:06 am
Posted on 8/3/24 at 6:19 am to OMLandshark
quote:
You’re an idiot if you believe that.
Are you serious? You really think former presidents keep the same level of SS protection as they did while they were in office?
Hell there was a time when Bernie used to complain about a lack of SS protection when he was a major candidate.
This post was edited on 8/3/24 at 6:24 am
Back to top


0



