Started By
Message

re: The Secret Service didn’t give Trump counter snipers for TWO YEARS until the Butler Rally

Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:57 pm to
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
83154 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:57 pm to
I don’t know why anyone could argue with a straight faced that it’s inconceivable that this was an inside job. That if the feds weren’t in on it, they at least willfully allowed the shooter a good chance of getting the kill. Dems tried to impeach Trump on demonstrably false accusations. In normal circumstances this would be called a coup or possibly even treason. Then they tried to put him in jail on bullshite charges in a targeted persecution, orchestrated by Dems in a Dem city with a Dem judge. He didn’t go to jail so…simply killing him is the logical next step.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
20596 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

Can you fricking read? My subject was “If this isn’t happening, then Laura Loomer should never be taken seriously again.”

Yes, I read ~9 days ago you thought she actually had any credibility.

quote:

Me posting about that and saying take it with a grain of salt doesn’t mean shite.

Nothing you say means shite
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
83154 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

He wasn’t the official nominee either that Saturday, so no.

That what I’m saying…is it customary for candidates who aren’t yet the official nominee to get full SS protection? Did Trump get less protection than a similarly situated candidate? I don’t know so I’m asking.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

Yes, I read ~9 days ago you thought she actually had any credibility.


Go look down the post where I call her a nutcase several times. You’re fricking liar.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
38475 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

in a BlackRock commercial


Time to pull off a grand, decade long conspiracy to kill a president - let’s not forget to leave clues for OML first
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

Time to pull off a grand, decade long conspiracy to kill a president - let’s not forget to leave clues for OML first




Fortune: Trump shooter was once featured in a BlackRock ad

And if you don’t see the problem with that, you either don’t know what BlackRock is or you’re a retard.
Posted by mudshuvl05
Member since Nov 2023
3131 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

You should try Xanax.
I know, that was wordy AF OG, FR FR no cap
Posted by LSUA 75
Colfax,La.
Member since Jan 2019
4654 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:51 pm to
“ The counter snipers were there to make sure the shooter couldn’t talk afterward”.

I think you called it right.
Initially,I just thought it was just a frick up by the SS.I just hard a hard time believing the SS was corrupt and would participate in an assassanation.
At this point it ‘s pretty obvious this was a CIA/FBI operation and the SS was involved.
That Crooks guy was given ample opportunity to kill Trump.But by the grace of God or luck,whatever you want to call it,Trump only recieved a flesh wound.

I’m sure it never occurred to Crooks that he was going to get whacked as part of the plan.No telling what he was promised.

Our country is in a seriously bad place.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
83154 posts
Posted on 8/2/24 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

At this point it ‘s pretty obvious this was a CIA/FBI operation and the SS was involved.

Certainly possible and wouldn’t surprise me. But really, it doesn’t require a vast complex conspiracy. All it takes is a few well placed people to allow a threat. They didn’t have to cause Crooks to show up with a rifle, they just needed to let him squeeze off some shots before taking action.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 12:07 am to
quote:

They didn’t have to cause Crooks to show up with a rifle, they just needed to let him squeeze off some shots before taking action.


So Crooks just happens to show up the first time Trump has been given counter snipers in two years? Or maybe they knew that Crooks was going to show up, and they were told to stand down until he shot the President?

Keep in mind it was a member of the local police that found Crooks a minute before the assassination attempt (not to mention dozens of Trump supporters two minutes and one second before the shots were fired) and not the Secret Service.

With this new bit of information, it seems more likely that the counter snipers were there for two reasons:

A) To cover their asses when people ask “why weren’t there any counter snipers?”
B) To kill the shooter, who is almost certainly MKUltra, to prevent him from talking.
This post was edited on 8/3/24 at 12:13 am
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52914 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 12:36 am to
quote:

Why after years of no Secret Service counter-snipers, did they show up in Butler?


Because

1) he isn’t entitled or have they ever been given the same level of SS protection as the president. You typically get just a couple of SS bodyguards as a former president and that’s it. That isn’t a Trump thing. That’s an everyone thing.

2) Protections for all major candidates ramp up in the lead up to the national convention for both parties, increasing the closer to election. This designation doesn’t happen within the SS either, but by Congress.
This post was edited on 8/3/24 at 12:37 am
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
107535 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 12:43 am to
Calm down.. The governmwnt would never kill one of our own. We are all Americans.. Trump., Biden.. Hariris.. They may disagree but they All bleed red white and blue!!

Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 12:59 am to
You’re an idiot if you believe that.
Posted by WalkonQB
Member since Jun 2023
511 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 1:04 am to
Typically I’m not into conspiracy theories. I will just add that at my commencement ceremony Bush and Francois Mitterrand (President of France) both spoke.
They shut down a highway overpass next to the stadium, they had visible snipers on the roofs of the surrounding dorms and we could hardly hear because there were helos in the air the entire time.

All of these years later they don’t have drones?
A rooftop within 150 yards isn’t secured?
Extremely gross negligence at the very least.
Posted by North Dallas Tiger
United States of America
Member since Mar 2024
13008 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 1:50 am to
quote:

The fact that nobody gives a frick about this anymore is kind of concerning
It's highly concerning to say the least...

I think deep down many leftists and progressives wished the bullet would not have missed...
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
27549 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 2:18 am to
quote:

We all know that Crooks was MKUltra or whatever the CIA rebranded it internally as. Nothing else makes sense.

You can’t actually believe this
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52914 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 5:04 am to
It’s not “believe”

It’s literal law.

You seriously think you have snipers following Clinton or Obama around whenever they visit a city?

Even in the first couple years after?


I get you became an expert in the past 2 weeks by reading tweets that made you feel good though.
This post was edited on 8/3/24 at 5:04 am
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52914 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 5:05 am to
quote:

I will just add that at my commencement ceremony Bush and Francois Mitterrand (President of France) both spoke.
They shut down a highway overpass next to the stadium, they had visible snipers on the roofs of the surrounding dorms and we could hardly hear because there were helos in the air the entire time.


You have never seen a former president or potential candidate being treated with the same security as the current one.


Not even same. Not even within the same order of magnitude
This post was edited on 8/3/24 at 5:06 am
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
27179 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 6:19 am to
quote:

You’re an idiot if you believe that.


Are you serious? You really think former presidents keep the same level of SS protection as they did while they were in office?

Hell there was a time when Bernie used to complain about a lack of SS protection when he was a major candidate.
This post was edited on 8/3/24 at 6:24 am
Posted by TomballTiger
Htown
Member since Jan 2007
3970 posts
Posted on 8/3/24 at 6:22 am to
Poli board count
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram