- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/16/17 at 2:33 pm to TechDawg2007
Why would someone making only 215k buy a 1.2 million dollar home? Dumb decision.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 2:36 pm to TechDawg2007
That's it! I'm moving back in with my parents!
Posted on 5/16/17 at 2:36 pm to GRTiger
quote:
If I was going to spend that much on a house, with that salary, I'd do it in TX, LA, TN, etc.. That's a beautiful home in a great part of the city in Houston, Dallas, New Orleans, and Nashville. In SF, that's an average looking, small home if you want to be close to the center of the action.
Plus, you don't have to live with SF residents.
San Francisco prices out all of the "undesirables" while also beating the drum for everyone else to strive for "equality". There's a reason Oakland is a shithole. It's San Francisco's section 8 tenement on the other side of town.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 2:37 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Love it when these dumb fricking lists include Mufreesboro
They also list the average home price of New Orleans at 188k, you'll have to double that at minimum in order to live in an inhabitable area.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 2:40 pm to TechDawg2007
I guess if they don't have to buy food or a car.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 2:40 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
They also list the average home price of New Orleans at 188k, you'll have to double that at minimum in order to live in an inhabitable area.
I imagine they include all areas of every city listed. The number is always lower than you think, because they are including the shittier parts of town that most people wouldn't want to live. I imagine it's the easiest or fairest way to make lists like this.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 2:42 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I imagine they include all areas of every city listed. The number is always lower than you think, because they are including the shittier parts of town that most people wouldn't want to live. I imagine it's the easiest or fairest way to make lists like this
It probably is, but some cities have much larger shitty areas than others
Posted on 5/16/17 at 2:53 pm to AwesomeSauce
quote:
So... the people who are screaming about living wages, socialism, etc. all attempt to concentrate in these areas. I know it's off topic, but I'm just attempting to understand how their want to live in areas that far outpace the national average for cost of living has any correlation with conservatives holding them down.
While the media covers SJW groups pushing for these things, most of the people actually needing living wages or a raise in minimum wage typically are already from those areas. If you are poor, it's difficult to move out of an area.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 2:59 pm to TheCaterpillar
I'm thinking the same tomfoolery is going on with the Chicago numbers. I was always under the impression that Chicago was quite pricey to live in if you didn't want to reside in the hood.
Murfreesboro's real estate is getting out of control too. They're building some expensive new homes over by Siegel High and from what I've been told, people are filling them with the quickness. Used to be a sleepy little college town that nobody lived in unless you worked at State Farm or Nissan.
Murfreesboro's real estate is getting out of control too. They're building some expensive new homes over by Siegel High and from what I've been told, people are filling them with the quickness. Used to be a sleepy little college town that nobody lived in unless you worked at State Farm or Nissan.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 3:03 pm to tigrbabe08
quote:
I was always under the impression that Chicago was quite pricey to live in if you didn't want to reside in the hood.
Maybe I'm jaded from the Boston real estate market, but when I was in Chicago about a year ago I was surprised at how much more affordable apartments were. And I definitely wasn't walking around the hood.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 3:03 pm to TechDawg2007
Cities are not localized enough to accurately depict cost of living, especially if that city's jurisdictional boundary has a massive footprint or a small one. As was stated earlier, if you're living in Manhattan, it's probably around $3M for 2,000 sq ft loft.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 3:12 pm to HempHead
Same can be said as the East is bringing home values in Nola down as well. Time for the east to secede to make New Orleans property value great again.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 3:36 pm to HempHead
$600k in Manhattan will buy a 400-600sqft which means a studio or 1 bed. In most cities the listed median respresents a home for a family. Double the $600k if you want 2 bedrooms.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 3:42 pm to TechDawg2007
I hace friends moving from Denver to BR because of housing costs. They estimate they can retire a good decade earlier.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 3:43 pm to TechDawg2007
quote:
New Orleans
Median home price: $188,055
Income needed for a 10 percent down payment: $31,188
Income needed for a 20 percent down payment: $26,048
So lets say I have 40 grand laying around. Yet given that, I only make 30K/year. I don't see any way in hell that I'd get approved for a loan at 165000+. Is that right? I mean if that person had 0 debt I bet they would be hard pressed to get financed for that amount with that income.
Am I wrong here?
Posted on 5/16/17 at 3:43 pm to ThatMakesSense
quote:
Monaco
The Monoco Grand Prix is in two weeks. True ballers.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 3:46 pm to Alt26
quote:
Plus, you don't have to live with SF residents.
Hey now. I am downright delightful!
Posted on 5/16/17 at 3:54 pm to Bmath
quote:
most of the people actually needing living wages or a raise in minimum wage typically are already from those areas
This is a keyword here. The people that need it aren't at the forefront of the conversation, nor are they the ones who are being the most vocal for it. My point is/was that their is a large concentration of people in these areas who glamorize the lifestyles there, but cannot afford it. Therefore other people should pay for it via taxes or inflation to support them. I have no problem with each local municipality or state government setting and maintaining a living wage. I do have an issue with people championing for a set of guidelines mandated nationally and paid for nationally that only helps a few while further punishing the silent majority who already fund the majority of government.
I could have been more clear with my original argument, but I am in no way marginalizing the struggle of those in need. My only argument is that with such varying costs of living that the whole $15/hr crap that has gone nationwide is asinine. The socialism bit was just a bit of vitrol from being a Xer with a lot of Xer "friends" and family who have no concept of global economics or how stateside socialism could be a huge catalyst for a second depression nationally and globally. Though I guess it would be poetic justice that what helped save the US the last time could be a final straw this time.
Posted on 5/16/17 at 3:58 pm to GRTiger
quote:
a great part of the city
quote:
New Orleans
Does not compute.
This post was edited on 5/16/17 at 3:59 pm
Popular
Back to top


1








