- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The President: America benefits when oil prices increase
Posted on 3/13/26 at 12:40 pm to JohnnyKilroy
Posted on 3/13/26 at 12:40 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Which also happened in 2022 when Russia kicked off their war in Ukraine
Come to think of it, that’s true. His first release of 50 million BBLs predated that, though. Not sure why he did that.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 12:45 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
Can't imagine why the unloading pt 2 stopped at the election. It sounds an awful lot like
quote:
Biden tapped into the reserves to get an economic stimulus to help him win an election.
Probably was. I don’t have my head in the sand when my side behaves that way. But right now the draw down is wise and what it should be used for.
I’m not a fan of SPR as I’ve argued in this space before. The purpose for which it was devised is gone. We are a net exporter of energy. If we want to spend a shite ton of money to insulate ourselves from energy shocks we should reduce regulations on refining and perhaps give some tax breaks to oil companies to build new ones that can handle West Texas sweet crude. We could pay for it by moth balling SPR. This and smother Gavin Newsome.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:21 pm to ragincajun03
trump is full of shite
seems to be a common theme these days
seems to be a common theme these days
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:16 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
I remember futures were briefly negative on 4/20. I also remember some multi trillion dollar spending bill, with outrageous money printing with stimmies and ppp fraud for all. Then there's the fact we actually refilled about half that reduction, just in time for someone to start dumping it August through last week of October. Can't imagine why the unloading pt 2 stopped at the election.
That period is not a huge change from what was happening since 2015 (mandate passed in 2015 to begin in 2017) due congress passing law to mandate the sell off a certain amount each year to fund spending and then doing it again later. A certain amount of reductions since 2015 has been mandated. The below graphs were made in 2017 and 2018 and were mostly projections. Besides the 2024 budget Act mandating sales I am not sure if anything with covid or post changed those projections.
quote:
The Bipartisan Budget Act (Section 404), enacted in 2015, includes authorization for funding an SPR modernization program to support improvements deemed necessary to preserve the long-term integrity and utility of SPR's infrastructure by selling up to $2 billion worth of SPR crude oil in fiscal years 2017 through 2020. Although the estimated volumes presented in the chart above are based on an assumed oil price of $50 per barrel, the actual final sales volumes will depend on how SPR decides to allocate the sales volumes across those fiscal years and the actual price of crude oil at the time of the sales. For the Section 404 sales, SPR must get an appropriation from Congress to approve its requested sales revenue target.
Another section of the Bipartisan Budget Act (Section 403) mandates SPR crude oil sales for fiscal years 2018 through 2025 on a volumetric basis, rather than on a dollar basis, as specified in Section 404. The revenues from sales authorized under section 403 will be deposited into the general fund of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
The 21st Century Cures Act, enacted in December 2016, calls for the sale of 25 million barrels of SPR crude oil for fiscal years 2017 through 2019. The first portion of these sales is expected in late spring 2017.
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, enacted in December 2015, calls for SPR sales totaling 66 million barrels from fiscal years 2023 through 2025.
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, enacted in February 2018, calls for the sale of 30 million barrels over the four-year period of FY 2022 through FY 2025, 35 million barrels in FY 2026, and 35 million barrels in FY 2027.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, enacted in December 2017, calls for the sale of 7 million barrels over the two-year period of FY 2026 through FY 2027.
After the attempt/request to purchase more during beginning of Covid not getting funding from Congress they leased space to companies to store their excess temporarily in the reserve to be reversed by end of March 2021 at the latest. Some funds also went to buy additional reserves from smaller companies. Not sure if lease inputs and outputs recorded in official reserve numbers (seems likely based on structure of transactions), but they could account for some of both during 2020 on top of the mandated sell offs and the purchases made from companies with 5,000 or less employees.
For the 2024 sell off I guess you could say Biden’s Autopen did not initiate the additional sell off for the election, but they did try to claim it.
quote:
On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced that it would sell 1 million barrels of gasoline, equaling 42 million gallons, from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) ahead of July 4. A DOE press release said the sale would largely impact "the states of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania."
"The Biden-Harris Administration continues to take strategic action to lower prices for American consumers in every aspect of their lives—especially as summer driving season ramps up," said DOE Secretary Jennifer Granholm. "By releasing this reserve ahead of July 4th, we are ensuring sufficient supply flows to the Northeast at a time hardworking Americans need it the most."
But the sale was not some magnanimous gesture—in fact, it was required by law. And it's hard to see how the act will make much of a difference, unless the goal is to shore up President Joe Biden's flailing reelection bid.
Section 308 of the 2024 Consolidated Appropriations Act mandated that "the Secretary of Energy shall draw down and sell one million barrels of refined petroleum product from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve during fiscal year 2024" and then "carry out the closure of the Northeast Gasoline Supply Reserve." For the DOE to brag about this sale, "the administration is claiming credit for a policy enacted by Congress," says Peter Van Doren, senior fellow at the Cato Institute.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:44 pm to TigerGman
quote:
Any of you whinny poors ever thought what happens to oil prices when Iran sets off a nuke in Israel, or even New York or D.C.?
quote:
Buncha downvotes which is fine. But not a single one of you downvotes have the balls to come on here and dispute what I said.
My bet is they already have one, suitcase sized, whether enriched uranium, commercial reactor plutonium based, or bought from rouge actors in Pakistan or North Korea. The question becomes, how crazy is a cornered religious fanatic regime willing to go to destroy the world economy?
The Foundiing Fathers wisely gave the power to declare war to the people's representatives in Congress, where it could be debated. One man with that power was never their intent, in fact just the opposite.
Iran is an odious regime responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans. Nonetheless, the purpose and end game for war has not been logically explained to the American public. Nor has air power alone ever won a war.
Israel has brought us into a situation with potentially catastrophic consequences for the world economy, and our military. The Trump Administration is acting exactly opposite to what was pledged during their campaign.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:44 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
Looks stable af between late 2011 and March 2017 to me
Considering I said it started in 2015 not sure why going back to 2011 means anything (Also, if you are going to jump back to 2011 why didn’t you just go back to mid or early 2011???). Also it started due mandates passed in 2015 and then more in 2016. If the mandated sell offs didn’t start until 2017 than I misread the graph I found and included in my post that had years pretty close together and no lines going up from them and then went with when the first mandates were passed and signed into law (2015), but no mandated sell offs under Trump’s first term were actually passed into law while he was President. They were mandated sell offs put into law under and by Obama.
quote:
The Bipartisan Budget Act (Section 404), enacted in 2015, includes authorization for funding an SPR modernization program to support improvements deemed necessary to preserve the long-term integrity and utility of SPR's infrastructure by selling up to $2 billion worth of SPR crude oil in fiscal years 2017 through 2020. Although the estimated volumes presented in the chart above are based on an assumed oil price of $50 per barrel, the actual final sales volumes will depend on how SPR decides to allocate the sales volumes across those fiscal years and the actual price of crude oil at the time of the sales. For the Section 404 sales, SPR must get an appropriation from Congress to approve its requested sales revenue target.
Another section of the Bipartisan Budget Act (Section 403) mandates SPR crude oil sales for fiscal years 2018 through 2025 on a volumetric basis, rather than on a dollar basis, as specified in Section 404. The revenues from sales authorized under section 403 will be deposited into the general fund of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
The 21st Century Cures Act, enacted in December 2016, calls for the sale of 25 million barrels of SPR crude oil for fiscal years 2017 through 2019. The first portion of these sales is expected in late spring 2017.
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, enacted in December 2015, calls for SPR sales totaling 66 million barrels from fiscal years 2023 through 2025.
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, enacted in February 2018, calls for the sale of 30 million barrels over the four-year period of FY 2022 through FY 2025, 35 million barrels in FY 2026, and 35 million barrels in FY 2027.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, enacted in December 2017, calls for the sale of 7 million barrels over the two-year period of FY 2026 through FY 2027.
And I think you meant year 2017 not 2020 in the below
quote:While not choosing to go back to go back to April 1, 2011 & it’s 726,542 level while talking about stability…
2011-Oct 10/07 695,956
2020-Feb 02/24 695,076
I am also guessing you didn’t remember that the answer to your below comment was actually the laws mentioned earlier that were passed in 2015 and 2016 that mandated the reduction you questioned in below quote and not a Trump policy. The laws were about gaining additional revenue for the govt and not about anyone manipulating the market.
quote:
Any word why trump 1.0 reduced the SPR 10% from inauguration through mid November/beginning of December 2019 feel free to frame your response around almost every last month in that period was record production.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:48 pm to dallastigers
The National Gasoline Reserve is (was) not the SPR.
The barrels were mandated to be sold during fiscal year of 2024 but the exact date was left up to the executive branch. Selling the barrels just before peak driving season would be the proper move if you wanted to lower gas prices at the pump during peak season.
All of those sales can be stopped by Congress with a vote to fund an alternative way. Both democrat and republican led Congress's have decided against voting to stop sales.
The barrels were mandated to be sold during fiscal year of 2024 but the exact date was left up to the executive branch. Selling the barrels just before peak driving season would be the proper move if you wanted to lower gas prices at the pump during peak season.
All of those sales can be stopped by Congress with a vote to fund an alternative way. Both democrat and republican led Congress's have decided against voting to stop sales.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 3/13/26 at 3:08 pm to TigerGman
quote:
Buncha downvotes which is fine. But not a single one of you downvotes have the balls to come on here and dispute what I said.
Your statement assumes we had only two choices and two out comes. Choice one ..what we are doing now. Outcome..no nuke in DC, New York, Israel. Choice 2 ..something else . Outcome nuke goes off in Israel, New York, DC. Thats total bullshite all the way around.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 3:45 pm to fightin tigers
quote:It seems like the law included it as part of our strategic reserves or authorized additional sales of the reserve, but since it said the refined petroleum product it seems to be about product that was in the Northeast Gasoline Supply Reserve which is mentioned as part of our Strategic Petroleum Reserves.
The National Gasoline Reserve is (was) not the SPR.
A few items removed from the below quote that were in brackets or in between other signs as I kept getting the stop sign error until I removed those. Link included.
quote:https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/4366/text#H13AC7344E6644BC8B0BAA51BE68F9163
Sec. 308. NOTE: 42 USC 6241 note. (a) Notwithstanding sections
161 and 167 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6241,
6247), the Secretary of Energy shall draw down and sell one million
barrels of refined petroleum product from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve during fiscal year 2024.
(b) All proceeds from such sale shall be deposited into the general
fund of the Treasury during fiscal year 2024.
(c) Upon the completion of such sale, the
Secretary shall carry out the closure of the Northeast Gasoline Supply
Reserve.
(d)(1) The Secretary of Energy may not establish any new regional
petroleum product reserve unless funding for the proposed regional
petroleum product reserve is explicitly requested in advance in an
annual budget submitted by the President pursuant to section 1105 of
title 31, United States Code, and approved by the Congress in an
appropriations Act.
(2) The budget request or notification
shall include-
(A) the justification for the new reserve;
(B) a cost estimate for the
establishment, operation, and maintenance of the reserve,
including funding sources;
(C) a detailed plan for operation of the reserve, including
the conditions upon which the products may be released;
(D) the location of the reserve; and
(E) the estimate of the total
inventory of the reserve.
Sec. 309. NOTE: Petroleum products. China. None of the funds
made available by this Act may be used to draw down and sell petroleum
products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (1) to any entity that is
under the ownership, control, or influence of the Chinese Communist
Party; or (2) except on condition that such petroleum products will not
be exported to the People's Republic of China.
Even the Energy department used the terminology.
quote:
The sale of the Northeast Gasoline Supply Reserve (NGSR) was directed by Act of Congress, bill H.R.4366 – Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, that became public law on March 9, 2024.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act directed the Secretary of Energy to sell one million barrels of refined petroleum product (gasoline) from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. “Upon the completion of such sale, the Secretary shall carry out the closure of the NGSR.”
https://www.energy.gov/hgeo/opr/northeast-gasoline-supply-reserve-ngsr
quote:I guess you missed the point being made about that they took credit for something they were required by law to do. The timing during the required year wasn’t the point of my comment.
The barrels were mandated to be sold during fiscal year of 2024 but the exact date was left up to the executive branch. Selling the barrels just before peak driving season would be the proper move if you wanted to lower gas prices at the pump during peak season
quote:Another point that really isnt relevant to what you are responding to. I have actually included the Acts that were passed under Trumps first term to take place in the future including some mandated sales starting during his 2nd term.
All of those sales can be stopped by Congress with a vote to fund an alternative way. Both democrat and republican led Congress's have decided against voting to stop sales.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 3/13/26 at 3:58 pm to dallastigers
quote:
The timing during the required year wasn’t the point of my comment.
I understand. It would undermine your framing to include what they took credit for.
The stipulation of foreign sales is just poster board material. It gets the people going though.
quote:
Another point that really isnt relevant to what you are responding to. I have actually included the Acts that were passed under Trumps first term to take place in the future including some mandated sales starting during his 2nd term
I think it is but that is only because Republicans/Democrats refused to stop the sales (GOP had control of Congress) while also complaining Biden was draining the SPR through acts they put in place to force his hand.
Again though. You are trying to spin a story so facts like that distract from what you are doing.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 3/13/26 at 5:24 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
I understand. It would undermine your framing to include what they took credit for.
The stipulation of foreign sales is just poster board material. It gets the people going though.
I get that you can’t admit that you were just trying to make whatever points you could regardless of relevance to my post.
My inclusion of foreign sales part of the law was to include another use of the NG reserve being including in the Strategic Reserves after your comment - “ The National Gasoline Reserve is (was) not the SPR.” The bill’s inclusion was to stop those countries from directly profiting off the sell off.
quote:
I think it is but that is only because Republicans refused to stop the sales (they had control of Congress) while also complaining Biden was draining the SPR through acts they put in place to force his hand.
Biden’s Autopen drained much more off than any of the projections from laws mandating future sell downs passed from 2015 thru 2018. I also don’t think Biden’s Autopen was thought to ever be a future President during those years to specifically be an attempt to force his hand as president (or his Autopen) for those amounts.
With you jumping around and misreading things I am not sure what time period you are saying Republicans controlled congress. So just in case:
Since you mention blaming Biden’s Autopen and this has been about you misreading a point on Biden’s Autopen they did not control it all under Biden’s Autopen in 2024 and only gained the House after 2022 elections.
2019 & 2020 Republicans didn’t control the entire Congress.
If you were taking about congress in 2017 & 2018 then see the below:
I included the ones passed under Trump’s first term twice and even made them bold like the others in one post. The point of pointing out the laws passed in 2015 & 2016 was to explain why the consistent sell offs started in 2017 and why they were not an attempt by Trump to manipulate the market as was implied by another poster. They were mandated by law passed and enacted under Obama not Trump.
quote:What exactly am I doing in your mind?
Again though. You are trying to spin a story so facts like that distract from what you are doing.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 5:38 pm to dallastigers
quote:
and only gained the House after 2022 elections.
There was a 2023 sale of 26MMBBL that could have been stopped but wasn't.
Later that year Biden and Congress came to an agreement to stop forced sales until 2028 or so (didn't hold....oops).
Congress can stop the forced sales and choose not to. Still do it. You can blame Biden and the democrats if it helps you sleep better.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 3/13/26 at 6:39 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
Your statement assumes we had only two choices and two out comes. Choice one ..what we are doing now. Outcome..no nuke in DC, New York, Israel. Choice 2 ..something else . Outcome nuke goes off in Israel, New York, DC. Thats total bullshite all the way around.
So in other words, you trust a radical, hate filled theocracy that publicly hangs women for showing their hair to make rational decisions?
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 6:40 pm
Posted on 3/13/26 at 7:17 pm to TigerGman
Dispute what you said? How do you dispute something that has not happened and never will?
There never has been a honest intelligence estimate that says that the US mainland is under threat directly from Iran. Anything else if just bulls*** manipulation of the facts by Isreal.
Small terrorist cells, sure. But a nuclear missile launch aimed at the US? GTFO....
There never has been a honest intelligence estimate that says that the US mainland is under threat directly from Iran. Anything else if just bulls*** manipulation of the facts by Isreal.
Small terrorist cells, sure. But a nuclear missile launch aimed at the US? GTFO....
Posted on 3/13/26 at 7:29 pm to dallastiger55
quote:
Legitimately curious, but has the political board always been far right?
I mean this with no ambiguity or exaggeration, that board is just as far right as r/politics is left. They’ll say no it’s not because they don’t ban people for disagreeing but there’s plenty of examples of that happening, it just doesn’t happen to any of them so they don’t hear about it
Posted on 3/13/26 at 7:53 pm to nealnan8
quote:
But a nuclear missile launch aimed at the US? GTFO....
Well, we won't know if Death to America is just an idle threat till they can build one will we?
But no doubt in mind you're ok with that
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 3/13/26 at 9:12 pm to TigerGman
quote:
in other words, you trust a radical, hate filled theocracy that publicly hangs women for showing their hair to make rational decisions?
If Trump.wouldve made a deal.....would that have been him trusting the regime?
Posted on 3/13/26 at 9:21 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
you realize we’re here on Tigerdroppings.com, not Reddit?
Good point. This is tigerdroppings.com. A message board dominated by southern conservative white males.
I'll let you think on that for a bit.
Popular
Back to top


0








