- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The gloves are off regarding St. George...
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:37 pm to sec13rowBBseat28
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:37 pm to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:I know... I read your article.
Research Sandy Springs, GA
I was just providing logical reinforcement about why your link was valuable and important.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:39 pm to Mahootney
4) or live in BR and put your kids in private school.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:41 pm to ell_13
quote:Well said.
People make choices based on information and perceived personal/overall gain. It's important to get the information as accurate as possible so people can make the best choice. It's why politics is shite. Information is twisted, withheld, manipulated, etc. so votes/choices can be manipulated as well.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:43 pm to Mahootney
quote:
People make choices based on information and perceived personal/overall gain. It's important to get the information as accurate as possible so people can make the best choice. It's why politics is shite. Information is twisted, withheld, manipulated, etc. so votes/choices can be manipulated as well.
But this is true at all levels of public voting and input.
This is what dictators say to stop the people from having a voice.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:44 pm to Beau Tie
quote:Excellent point.
If BR has such great schools and such great leadership and a great bond rating and really don't receive that much money from the unicorporated area seeking to incorporate into its own city then why is it such a big deal to these city leaders and the people who live in the city of BR? Why are they calling half the city racists because of where they live? Why don't they want these people to vote?
Maybe they are just looking out for SG's best interests. Happens all the time, you know, politicians looking out for other peoples' best interests and not their own.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:46 pm to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:Let me see if I can find how much it costs for private schools in BR and see how much the SG taxes would have to go up to be economically better.
4) or live in BR and put your kids in private school.
ETA: 2013 Parkview ~$7685.33/yr
Anhh. Too much work. Found this thread on TD discussing the issue. LINK
quote:Since Parkview has gone up around $2k in 5 years. Let's assume that all of the figures listed haven't gone down and are at least the same.
For the 2007-2008 school year, annual tuition for LSU's Lab School for all grades was $3,652. Tuition at St. Joseph’s Academy was $7,931; at Parkview Baptist, $5,440 to $5,865; and at Episcopal High School, $9,850 to $12,900.
With that said, you either have to move out of EBR, win the BRHS lottery, or pay at least $3k - $7k for a quality private school education.
Anyone want to claim that the SG taxes will go up by $3k?
This post was edited on 1/12/14 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:47 pm to Traffic Circle
quote:No. It's what I say to warn people not to trust politicians and to come to one's own conclusion based on independent information.
This is what dictators say to stop the people from having a voice.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:54 pm to Mahootney
quote:
and really don't receive that much money from the unicorporated area seeking to incorporate into its own city then why is it such a big deal to these city leaders and the people who live in the city of BR?
What's funny is the people posting that BR doesn't receive money from the unincorporated area are actually posting in a thread who's first post has a link to the advocate. That link outlines the council meeting where they discussed trying to lock down said money for ten more years.
Amazing to me.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:59 pm to LT
Posted on 1/12/14 at 4:03 pm to dragginass
Posted on 1/12/14 at 4:03 pm to dragginass
quote:So, people migrate in to go to LSU. Then they immediately relocated to other parishes upon graduation/starting a family.
"People with young children all want the same thing: a safe place to raise their kids with access to good schools," LSU sociology professor Troy Blanchard said. "Ascension and Livingston have those characteristics."
This post was edited on 1/12/14 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 1/12/14 at 4:06 pm to Mahootney
So college students come in, then they leave? 
Posted on 1/12/14 at 4:08 pm to ell_13
It explains the only positive EBR influx being in the college age demographics (17-22).
Kids from outside of EBR tend to live on or near campus to go to school.
Kids from outside of EBR tend to live on or near campus to go to school.
This post was edited on 1/12/14 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 1/12/14 at 4:09 pm to ell_13
quote:
So college students come in, then they leave?
That's me and just about everyone I know.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 4:17 pm to Mahootney
quote:
Anyone want to claim that the SG taxes will go up by $3k?
No kidding. The claim of $2k to $3K per year was made yesterday.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 4:18 pm to LT
quote:If talking on a per capita basis on a city of 100k.....
No kidding. The claim of $2k to $3K per year was made yesterday.
That's a $200M - $300M increase.
Lulz.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 4:27 pm to LT
What's amazing is your reading comprehension skills because I said doesn't receive THAT MUCH money from the unincorporated area. I never said no money or little money. People are here trying to say that SG couldn't survive on a per capita basis because they don't have enough money and yet in the same breath say that SG money taking out of the city budget would be a disastrous effect on BR. The only way this would be possible is if BR didn't have enough money to run its ship right now. If that was the case then they wouldn't have the triple A (AAA) rating they currently have.
So to the fella in here saying they need more information how about you dissect the information you have to see who's telling the truth.
So to the fella in here saying they need more information how about you dissect the information you have to see who's telling the truth.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 4:33 pm to Mahootney
quote:The projected increase is for property taxes on a $340,000 home, not per person. Reading comprehension skills are not one of your strong points.
If talking on a per capita basis on a city of 100k.....
That's a $200M - $300M increase.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 4:36 pm to Mahootney
quote:
LSURussian
Aw, that's just so precious! You missed me!
Popular
Back to top


0




