- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/12/14 at 2:54 pm to LSURussian
quote:
all boils down to whites wanting their own majority white school district
Please, please, please let the opposition scream this from the mountain tops.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 2:56 pm to LSURussian
Hey, let's not address the information in the article, let's attack the owner of the news paper and pull the race card!
Let's deflect! Much easier to win the arguement when you try to frame/ control the discussion!
Why are you trying to deceive everyone about the quality of ebr schools?
Let's deflect! Much easier to win the arguement when you try to frame/ control the discussion!
Why are you trying to deceive everyone about the quality of ebr schools?
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:05 pm to LSURussian
I don't care if the website is owned by the KKK themselves. You cannot refute the facts posted, so all you do is yell racist and wine like a fricktard.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:08 pm to LT
quote:Now he wants to disenfranchise people!
Further proof of Rush Limbaugh's theory that we should not let 'low information voters' get a vote.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:10 pm to Mahootney
If I could interrupt again...
I'm sure most of the folks arguing here, live in subject areas, or near there.
I'm also probably more racist, and more selfish than most.
That said, I think its very important that we figure out what is best for property values, and quality of life before you take a hard stand either way.
This is a good issue to go into open-minded.
IMO, and may very well be wrong, this would turn BR into a garbage dump. Who wants to live next to a garbage dump? Bad smells and rats tend to come out of dumps too.
I'll keep reading.
I'm sure most of the folks arguing here, live in subject areas, or near there.
I'm also probably more racist, and more selfish than most.
That said, I think its very important that we figure out what is best for property values, and quality of life before you take a hard stand either way.
This is a good issue to go into open-minded.
IMO, and may very well be wrong, this would turn BR into a garbage dump. Who wants to live next to a garbage dump? Bad smells and rats tend to come out of dumps too.
I'll keep reading.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:13 pm to Mahootney
I'll post it again since he can't refute it.
" "Sales taxes collected in Baton Rouge are placed n the Baton Rouge Fund. Sales taxes collected in Baker go into the Baker Fund. Sales taxes collected in Zachary go into the Zachary Fund. Sales taxes collected in Central go into the Central Fund. And sales taxes collected in the unincorporated parts of the parish are deposited into the Unincorporated Fund.
The money in the Baton Rouge Fund is used by Baton Rouge, and so on. But here’s where it gets “astounding.”
The cost of running Constitutional offices in the parish is $17.7 million. This is for the 19th Judicial District, Family Court, Juvenile Court, District Attorney, Registrar of Voters and Coroner. Then there is another $8.5 million that is used to fund the Parish Prison, Juvenile Services, Animal Control, and so on.
Guess where the money comes from?
All $26.2 million comes from the Unincorporated Fund!
The citizens of the unincorporated areas of the parish pay 100 percent of these expenses! Not one penny in sales taxes collected in Baton Rouge, Baker, Central or Zachary helps pay these expenses!
The next step is the kicker. After this $26.2 million is taken out of the Unincorporated Fund, there remains about $52 million. All of this money is then transferred to the City of Baton Rouge!"
LINK
" "Sales taxes collected in Baton Rouge are placed n the Baton Rouge Fund. Sales taxes collected in Baker go into the Baker Fund. Sales taxes collected in Zachary go into the Zachary Fund. Sales taxes collected in Central go into the Central Fund. And sales taxes collected in the unincorporated parts of the parish are deposited into the Unincorporated Fund.
The money in the Baton Rouge Fund is used by Baton Rouge, and so on. But here’s where it gets “astounding.”
The cost of running Constitutional offices in the parish is $17.7 million. This is for the 19th Judicial District, Family Court, Juvenile Court, District Attorney, Registrar of Voters and Coroner. Then there is another $8.5 million that is used to fund the Parish Prison, Juvenile Services, Animal Control, and so on.
Guess where the money comes from?
All $26.2 million comes from the Unincorporated Fund!
The citizens of the unincorporated areas of the parish pay 100 percent of these expenses! Not one penny in sales taxes collected in Baton Rouge, Baker, Central or Zachary helps pay these expenses!
The next step is the kicker. After this $26.2 million is taken out of the Unincorporated Fund, there remains about $52 million. All of this money is then transferred to the City of Baton Rouge!"
LINK
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:17 pm to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:
Please, please, please let the opposition scream this from the mountain tops.
I have no dog in this fight but I would absolutely love to sit back and watch that happen.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:18 pm to Grassy1
quote:
this would turn BR into a garbage dump. Who wants to live next to a garbage dump?
Maybe it will force them to look in the mirror and fix their problems.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:19 pm to dragginass
But bro... Exxon pays all of the taxes for the unincorporated area.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:21 pm to Grassy1
Outside of the LSU area, Baton Rouge already is a garbage dump.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:23 pm to Grassy1
quote:I agree. Let's get back to the real issue.
If I could interrupt again...
We've pretty much wrapped up that Russian is a race-baiter and has lost credibility.
quote:A quality school district would most likely increase the property values in SG. Just look at what quality education has done for Zachary and Ascension.
That said, I think its very important that we figure out what is best for property values, and quality of life before you take a hard stand either way. This is a good issue to go into open-minded. IMO, and may very well be wrong, this would turn BR into a garbage dump. Who wants to live next to a garbage dump?
I'm not sure what it would do for BR city property values, but I suspect not much.
They'll have the same school system they have now, but removing the SG residents from the BRHS pool will increase the remaining students' chances of getting into an A rated school.
You make a good point about "how will this affect BR city?".
I'm not sure BR would completely collapse, and I haven't seen any proof that will happen.
However, encouraging young people and families to remain in EBR parish (by providing the SG ISD) would probably help keep commerce in baton rouge vs those people leaving for better education opportunities in Zachary or Ascension.
Those families would live and spend their money in EBR parish.
You'd have to look at previous examples of incorporation as a benchmark for what you can expect from SG.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:25 pm to Jefferson Davis
Why does anyone want to quiet free choice, unless they are getting something out of it?
Put it to a vote. Then we'll see.
Put it to a vote. Then we'll see.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:27 pm to Mahootney
quote:
You'd have to look at previous examples of incorporation as a benchmark for what you can expect from SG.
Research Sandy Springs, GA.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:28 pm to Traffic Circle
quote:People make choices based on information and perceived personal/overall gain. It's important to get the information as accurate as possible so people can make the best choice. It's why politics is shite. Information is twisted, withheld, manipulated, etc. so votes/choices can be manipulated as well.
free choice
I have no dog in this. Just pointing out why there are arguments.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:32 pm to ell_13
I would rather have a vote, with bad information floating about; than somebody else deciding for me.
The anti-St. George people don't want it put to a vote - they want to decide.
The anti-St. George people don't want it put to a vote - they want to decide.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:34 pm to LSURussian
If BR has such great schools and such great leadership and a great bond rating and really don't receive that much money from the unicorporated area seeking to incorporate into its own city then why is it such a big deal to these city leaders and the people who live in the city of BR? Why are they calling half the city racists because of where they live? Why don't they want these people to vote?
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:35 pm to dragginass
quote:If true, this would just be a bonus. It may offset the costs of running SG or the SG ISD, but this issue isn't why people are trying to incorporate SG.
I'll post it again since he can't refute it.
If SG had quality schools, nothing would change from the status quo of today.
If I were a young professional or family, and I were looking for a place to live in or around Baton Rouge, education would be a major issue.
Here are your choices:
1) Live in Zachary, Ascension and guarantee your kids attend an A+ rated school. (Even Livingston has B+ schools).
2) Roll the dice that my kid gets into BRHS (which is a terrific school) instead of getting stuck with a C, D, or F rated school.
3) Attend the decent neighborhood elementary schools and have to move the Zachary or Ascension later on.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:36 pm to Traffic Circle
People making decisions with bad information can be much worse than no decision at all.
I'm not referring to this situation. Just food for thought.
I think the area has a right to decide for themselves if they go about it legally. But I also think they need to realize they're not getting all the facts from either side.
I'm not referring to this situation. Just food for thought.
I think the area has a right to decide for themselves if they go about it legally. But I also think they need to realize they're not getting all the facts from either side.
Posted on 1/12/14 at 3:37 pm to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:
Research Sandy Springs, GA.
The ny times article you linked was crazy similar to what is going on here. I like what Sandy Springs did with their opportunity.
I truly hope we can get a top flight city manager like they have.
Popular
Back to top


1




