Started By
Message

re: The era of the company man is over

Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:02 pm to
Posted by JEC119
Alabama
Member since Apr 2024
2106 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Now I work for myself and make more money doing less work


Same here… I should had gave my old company a big frick You sooner than I did.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
36121 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

And you scroll through someones post history for something like that. And you remembered something from a random stranger. What a little weasel frick you are


I’m a savant, I don’t know what you want me to say. I remembered your dumbass post and took the 15 seconds to find it
Posted by Honest Tune
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2011
19284 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

I’m a savant, I don’t know what you want me to say.


Is this code for autistic?
Posted by DeltaTigerDelta
Member since Jan 2017
13363 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:13 pm to
Can she possibly speak without moving her hand? Annoying.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
71795 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Is this code for autistic?


Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
36121 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

Is this code for autistic?


High functioning
Posted by Honest Tune
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2011
19284 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:43 pm to
Ok just checking. This thread should have turned into a WYHI? a long time ago anyway.
Posted by Defenseiskey
Houston, TX
Member since Nov 2010
1649 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:47 pm to
What good is being g a company man anyway? It's not like you're getting a pension. You employment status is more effected by shareholders than your actual performance. What fo you get out of it?
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
2778 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

 like 1 manager per department who’s job is to coordinate all of the outside service providers that do all the work


Sounds exactly like what happened to the lady's husband. Company probably figured they could get someone to do his job cheaper.
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
3813 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 12:58 pm to
I don’t doubt her story. Three years ago, one of my colleagues who was Divisional VP was let go because a group of 4 employees bypassed local HR and all sent complaints to the U.S. HQ in Houston. They are all friends who work together in mid level management positions and reported to him. They were taking advantage of his easy going leadership style and not really doing a good job. Because his bosses started questioning the P&L numbers, he had to start questioning some things with his team. Through that , a few of them were exposed. He started asking them to do their job and was holding them accountable. They came together and made a plan to eliminate him. They all sent complaints of some sort or another to Houston HR. All referring to something petty like an inappropriate joke he told. He was questioned and he offered his defense. To no avail. Corporate HR fired him. Guy was a 20+ year employee.

I will say that he was a guy that liked to joke around. The kind of guy who thought everyone at work was his friend. He treated employees like he would a good friend. A little razzing (jokingly) here and there. He learned a lesson I already knew. Be very cautious in what you say and who you say it to at work, especially when you have direct reports. That group didn’t like how he was making them actually have to do their jobs correctly ( after 5 years of jokey jokey fun boss) and they pooled the most petty BS to get him out of the picture. Just like that, gone.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
36121 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

They all sent complaints of some sort or another to Houston HR. All referring to something petty like an inappropriate joke he told. He was questioned and he offered his defense. To no avail. Corporate HR fired him. Guy was a 20+ year employee.

I will say that he was a guy that liked to joke around. The kind of guy who thought everyone at work was his friend. He treated employees like he would a good friend. A little razzing (jokingly) here and there. He learned a lesson I already knew. Be very cautious in what you say and who you say it to at work, especially when you have direct reports. That group didn’t like how he was making them actually have to do their jobs correctly ( after 5 years of jokey jokey fun boss) and they pooled the most petty BS to get him out of the picture. Just like that, gone
.

I’d put good money your “colleague” was a total weirdo and probably was making everyone uncomfortable often. Don’t be that guy, no one gives a frick about your shitty jones
Posted by LSU1SLU
Member since Mar 2013
7863 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

High functioning


Highly debatable.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293435 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 1:07 pm to
quote:


Is this code for autistic?


Anal retentive.

Ole Mingo has a control issue.



Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
135170 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 1:29 pm to
The last company I worked for decided to have employee achievement awards.
There were 3 levels. The first level nominations occurred at the team level, so I was in a team of about 40 employees and I got nominated for the award. Everyone that was nominated got the award.

Then, company wide, over 1000 employees, they awarded 5 people for the next level, the company vision excellence award. I was one of those chosen to receive that award company wide.

They then gave only 1 person the "team player excellence" award. I did not win, but I was 2nd in voting across the entire company.


3 weeks that, I was informed my job was being outsourced to IBM and was fired.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
119930 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Lawsuit is the only way forward.


What's funny is that this is supposed to be the point of HR. Before someone is fired HR has to make sure the company can't get sued or that the person who is going to get fired has no case.

And lawsuits cost money. When someone losses a job, they are not in a good place to be thinking about hiring a lawyer and filing a lawsuit. It sucks, but that's how it is. I learned a long time ago to never be loyal to a company. Loyalty used to mean something. My dad used to work at Albemarle (well it was Ethal when he started working there). I can remember late 80s and throughout the 90s. They treated their employees well. Health insurance was top notch, etc.

My dad got sick in the mid 90s and they took care of him. He passed away in 98 and that's when I met some of his coworkers. They were telling my mom that there were a lot of changes about to happen. They would be paying more for insurance with less coverage, the company would no longer give employee something after meeting so many safety hours.

Evidently employees used to play cards on lunch breaks and they were not allowing that anymore. I think what happened was, they were bringing in an HR team and instead of each location having their own "culture", everything would become more uniform and then they looked for ways to not spend as much money. And once you realize the bottom line is the only thing that matters you will understand loyalty doesn't exist anymore. You have to always do what's in your best interest.

Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
15537 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Then frick the 2 weeks' notice of quitting and doing anything above the bare minimum. Works both ways, pal.

As far as I’m concerned, 2 weeks notice does work both ways.

We’ll start talking about buyouts and severance packages well before 2 weeks, pal. It will be in the form of performance evaluations. You will see it coming.
Posted by whodatdude
Member since Feb 2011
1472 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

Sounds exactly like what happened to the lady's husband. Company probably figured they could get someone to do his job cheaper.


Yep, he could have been a top 10% performer and those typically come with top 10% wages, benefits, and long-term liabilities. The company was probably just looking for any reason to let him go so they could "restructure" (i.e., eliminate his position) and replace him with more contractors who they don't have to pay FICA or benefits for. 2 new contractors to replace the 1 full-time employee and none of the additional costs. This has been a noted trend, particularly since the pandemic.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
17288 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 3:13 pm to
She’s hot
Posted by 3deadtrolls
lafayette
Member since Jan 2014
6653 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

The era of the company man is over


Then who TF keeps yelling at us out here?
Posted by 6R12
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
11438 posts
Posted on 9/8/25 at 3:40 pm to
girl I don't believe nothing you just said. People think they are model employees everyday. They never see it from the other side.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram