- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/19/22 at 6:38 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
Don’t y’all think that Depp did beat her some? I get that her credibility sucks, but do you find none of it believable?
if we're basing this solely on the evidence presented in court... a lot of the evidence introduced to show he assaulted her is iffy at best
Posted on 5/19/22 at 7:13 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:I actually don’t.
Don’t y’all think that Depp did beat her some?
quote:You simply can not believe there was any physical or sexual assault. Until proven, you can not believe a word that comes out of her mouth.
do you find none of it believable?
The only witness she has that saw any physical assault is her sister who continuously tried to keep them together. While supposedly knowing Depp hit her. After coming from an abusive home herself.
Do you actually think her sister would continuously try to keep them together if she saw Depp hit her?
Posted on 5/19/22 at 7:24 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
Don’t y’all think that Depp did beat her some?
No. A liberal, black, woman lawyer on Court TV explained it best. (Court TV has been leaning to AH's side) said that any little mark AH had was gotten when JD was trying to protect himself, while running from her.
There is a bunch of it on tape, to prove that. She was clearly the aggressor, both with the screaming, and hitting.
He did more drugs, and drank more than her, but she was partying like a rockstar too.
This post was edited on 5/19/22 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 5/19/22 at 7:46 pm to Hangit
I have been corrected by the LawTube... closing arguments will NOT be constricted by the time constraints
ETA: now there's conflicting opinions about it... so I'm no longer sure
ETA: now there's conflicting opinions about it... so I'm no longer sure
This post was edited on 5/19/22 at 10:20 pm
Posted on 5/19/22 at 7:48 pm to Hangit
Thanks. I can’t follow the case closely, so I was just wondering.
Posted on 5/19/22 at 10:19 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
Don’t y’all think that Depp did beat her some?
I did. Now I don’t.
Posted on 5/19/22 at 10:19 pm to baybeefeetz
the LawTubers in the gallery say Amber Heard was visibly upset when the computer analyst who was on the stand today talked about "#AmberTurd"

Posted on 5/19/22 at 10:21 pm to rt3
quote:
and Rekieta says based on the testimony in court... there's at least a respectable chance (so... read that as more than 0%) that the judge grants it
A lot of times a judge will let a weak case go to the jury. If the jury goes wild, she can always JNOV it.
Posted on 5/19/22 at 10:36 pm to JudgeHolden
ok so Law & Lumber just cleared it up (he's from Fairfax)
closing arguments DO NOT go against the dedicated clock
closing has its own clock... which is basically Friday morning evenly split between the 2 sides
when the lunch break ends Friday... deliberations begin
closing arguments DO NOT go against the dedicated clock
closing has its own clock... which is basically Friday morning evenly split between the 2 sides
when the lunch break ends Friday... deliberations begin
Posted on 5/20/22 at 12:23 am to rt3
LawTube is being actively attacked by Heard's press team
Both Runkle of the Bailey (who's been in the gallery the last week) & Good Lawgic (who's been watching from his New York home) have had videos removed under the guise of them being "spam" videos
Both Runkle of the Bailey (who's been in the gallery the last week) & Good Lawgic (who's been watching from his New York home) have had videos removed under the guise of them being "spam" videos
Posted on 5/20/22 at 7:31 am to rt3
quote:
Both Runkle of the Bailey (who's been in the gallery the last week) & Good Lawgic (who's been watching from his New York home) have had videos removed under the guise of them being "spam" videos
Well that’s about as effective as pissing in the Pacific to make it saltier.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 7:40 am to rt3
quote:
#AmberTurd
She can thank herself. At first I thought the Amber hate was driven by older women in love with Johnny, and women haters threatened by the gals.
Then I watched the trial. Her claims are, at a minimum, exaggerated considerably.
Johnny is plainly a drunk and a drug addict who reacts strongly when you get between him and his addiction. I don’t doubt he laid hands on her at some point. But I don’t believe he hit her or raped her with a bottle in the way she says.
Relatedly, I get the sense that she is arrogant, ignoring her lawyers, and insisting on telling her story her way. That really hurt her.
A lot of you believe “she was the aggressor.” Maybe. But you don’t hit women. Hard stop. I don’t buy that line, and it doesn’t make any difference as the testimony came out if she was or wasn’t.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 8:22 am to JudgeHolden
Posted on 5/20/22 at 8:53 am to JDPndahizzy
quote:
video is live boys
Youtiube link
Just FYI... that's going to be yesterday's day of testimony
There is no trial today... there hasn't been trial on Fridays during this case at all... Fridays have been motions day
They're probably going over jury instructions with the judge today... but no trial, no testimony today... cameras won't be on today
Posted on 5/20/22 at 9:38 am to JDPndahizzy
is rekieta not doing a stream today? Every stream i click on says May 19?
Or they not in court?
Or they not in court?
Posted on 5/20/22 at 9:42 am to Pierre
quote:
is rekieta not doing a stream today? Every stream i click on says May 19?
Or they not in court?
they haven't had court on Fridays during this trial at all... Fridays have been for motions (ETA: except for next Friday which is set to be closing arguments & beginning of jury deliberations)
Rekieta said he may do a stream around 1 PM CT to answer superchats he hasn't been able to answer during the trial
but the next day of testimony is Monday
This post was edited on 5/20/22 at 9:43 am
Posted on 5/20/22 at 9:45 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
quote:
Don’t y’all think that Depp did beat her some?
I did. Now I don’t.
Same. I didn't watch much of the first part of the trial. I saw/heard some of JD's testimony here and there and the cross.
When Heard first got on the stand, I thought perhaps her story was true, but after that and particularly after the cross, I just don't believe her or, at least, have very huge doubts.
She was not a likable person on the stand, in my opinion. She buried herself in many ways and her lawyer didn't help her.
On many of the videos, JD sounds calm and she sounds nuts. That's not helpful to her.
The holding the dog out of the window is troublesome for JD in my opinion. Pet lovers on the jury may be swayed by that in some way that's not relevant to the real issues. I don't know, but it triggered me somewhat, admittedly.
I think both of them have big time problems. I'm not JD fan.
I think it's possible they both get zeroed, but I want to hear as much of the rest of the trial and closing arguments.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 10:13 am to Gris Gris
quote:
but I want to hear as much of the rest of the trial and closing arguments.
Me too..
Do you think johnny's team will be like,
Is my client a drunk?
Yes
Is he a drug addict?
Yes
Is he a control freak?
Yes
But that's not why we're here today.. My client may be a POS human but there's been no credible evidence that he has ever hit a female.. blah blah
I hope they REALLY point out that Amber's witnesses wouldn't even make the trip to testify on her behalf.. Only her coke whore sister
Popular
Back to top


5




