- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:35 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There wasn't a single action involved in this hand. If she had even a basic understanding of ranges and combinations, there's no way she could call and honestly think she's making the right decision.
Thats the whole thing about poker
You dont have to have a reason to do anything
You dont have to do the same thing all the time
You can take the nerd book of poker rules and say frick it im raising this shite on Jack high until the end
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:35 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:neither did I. My first post on the topic explained ways she could have cheated and how suspicious the whole series of events looked, but we have to wait for the investigation to unfold.
I've never said she cheated. You don't know anything.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:37 am to lance814
quote:
No one is “butthurt.”
Oh yea?
How else would you describe the poker bro overlord that just admitted poker is in fact a game of chance telling me I’m intellectually dishonest for leaving out the part of his post that told me to go gamble when I already said I don’t gamble?
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:38 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
in that he didn’t have anything. The more he pushed the more she thought he was bluffing.
But his bluff range beats her call range by a great deal. He basically had to have 1 of 2 combos (his hand and the same one in hearts) to have a bluff range that she could beat.
His actual bluff range was all Ax clubs, Kx clubs (more likely than Ac b/c he knows he doesn't have Ac and Ac is the most likely held bluff card) A lot of KQ suited (non hearts/clubs), some KQ off, QJ suited (non hearts/clubs) and, knowing Garrett, some QJ off.
Hell he's a wide guy, so KJ probably should get some conbos, too, esp KJh
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:39 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:its a game of chance and skill. I know you're pretty low iq but everything isn't binary
Tell me you’re butthurt about having to smith that poker is in fact a game of chance without actually saying it.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:39 am to rexorotten
quote:
Agreed, her plastic face is hideous, but dem titties!!!
How much have you contributed to bankroll this idiot?
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:41 am to Mizzoufan26
quote:
but he pushed on a middling draw.
There are 2 ways to make money in poker. Making your opponent fold their equity is one of those 2 ways.
Realizing your own equity is the other, which he had the option b/c pushing on a draw is only a semi-bluff.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:41 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
even better explanation from his twitter:
What a ducking douche that dude is.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:41 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:you said it's all chance. Yet ignore that continually shoving 10% holdings will go broke 100% of the time
I’m intellectually dishonest for leaving out the part of his post that told me to go gamble when I already said I don’t gamble?
This post was edited on 10/1/22 at 11:42 am
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You can't always win a poker. Again, you seem to have problems with basic math.
You dont even understand how these 2 statements are in direct conflict with each other. More self-important stupidity from you. 
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:42 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Tell me you’re butthurt about having to smith that poker is in fact a game of chance without actually saying it.
Why do you keep broadcasting how stupid you are? Any game where there are professionals consistently winning means it’s not entirely a game of chance. This concept is really easy to understand.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:43 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:ok you are really just this stupid. Nevermind
You dont even understand how these 2 statements are in direct conflict with each other.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:43 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
Instead you're melting down over what someone else did and arguing against math.
And you’re in here knighting for someone that handled the situation in the literal complete opposite way you said you would.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:43 am to Caraway Rye
quote:
If its basic math why can you not mathimatically figure out how to always win at poker
Imperfect information.
If I offered to play a game with you where I would flip a coin. Every time it landed on heads, you pay me $10. Every time it landed on tails, I pay you $20.
Would you play the game?
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There wasn't a single action involved in this hand. If she had even a basic understanding of ranges and combinations, there's no way she could call and honestly think she's making the right decision.
So you’ve never played against somebody with a big stack that bets preflop with nothing against one other player …..and then follows with a standard half pot bet after the flop?
What about his play? He raises and she calls….representing something. He bets and she reraises…representing something. He then puts her all in on a draw hand. He had a ton of outs but why risk $100k when $20k gets you another card. That move screamed “I just want you to go away”.
Now granted, she needed something to make that call but he doesn’t know she has shite for cards.
Maybe he was cheating?
This post was edited on 10/1/22 at 11:46 am
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:44 am to Caraway Rye
quote:
You dont have to have a reason to do anything
You dont have to do the same thing all the time
Sure, but I was talking about making the correct decision.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:44 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
You dont even understand how these 2 statements are in direct conflict with each other. More self-important stupidity from you
Oh please explain this one. I could use a good laugh this morning
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:44 am to lance814
quote:
There was no whining from me. I was attempting to inform the uninformed.
Another thing you failed at.
quote:
The garbage man comment was just a mild jab at a troll.
Another thing you failed at.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:44 am to EarlyCuyler3
A couple facts to clear some things up:
The OT has clearly never played much poker.
Robbi is bankrolled by her BF who was also at that table playing.
6mo ago all of her poker play was done online in the buy in range of $100-$500.
After this hand, she did an interview and was stuttering and stumbling for a reason she made that call.
Innocent people don’t give money back at a casino. EVER. Especially when your bankrolling BF is playing in the same game. She wasn’t intimidated. She was scared shitless a huge investigation was about to be launched and she gave back the money to squash the whole issue.
The OT has clearly never played much poker.
Robbi is bankrolled by her BF who was also at that table playing.
6mo ago all of her poker play was done online in the buy in range of $100-$500.
After this hand, she did an interview and was stuttering and stumbling for a reason she made that call.
Innocent people don’t give money back at a casino. EVER. Especially when your bankrolling BF is playing in the same game. She wasn’t intimidated. She was scared shitless a huge investigation was about to be launched and she gave back the money to squash the whole issue.
Page 16 of 38
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News