- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The craziest/best poker call I've ever seen (270k pot)
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:10 am to 10MTNTiger
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:10 am to 10MTNTiger
Probably because he was pitching such a fit she didn’t know what to do.
Explain to me how if she was cheating, somebody thought it was a good idea for her to call all in with a J against an OE straight and flush draw? And then ageee to 2 river cards? Any J, 6, 7, 8 or club and you’re done. The card she’s hoping to see beyond two runners is a J which fills his straight.
You don’t do that if you know what he has.
Explain to me how if she was cheating, somebody thought it was a good idea for her to call all in with a J against an OE straight and flush draw? And then ageee to 2 river cards? Any J, 6, 7, 8 or club and you’re done. The card she’s hoping to see beyond two runners is a J which fills his straight.
You don’t do that if you know what he has.
This post was edited on 10/1/22 at 11:33 am
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:10 am to Open Your Eyes
Intellectually dishonest to ignore the rest of my post but you do you
This post was edited on 10/1/22 at 11:11 am
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:13 am to Caraway Rye
quote:
Im not a complete degenerate
Just a moron. It's ok, I understand why you're scared.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:15 am to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
That's not a lucky call, it was an idiotic call. Not even the worst of the worst poker player would make that call. It makes absolutely no sense.
The only thing that makes sense is that it’s not her own money and she DGAF.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:16 am to 10MTNTiger
quote:
Please tell me why she gave the money back if she wasn’t cheating, lol
Because a person that just made a stupid decision to call made another stupid decision?
Because she was being bankrolled by someone else and didn’t care about the money?
Because chief princess poker bro overlord admitted in his multiple pages of self-pitty iphone notes to intimidating her with the owner of the casino and she didn’t want to deal with that?
No, the only possible explanation is cheating. And cheating that would have told her to fold, as many other people have pointed out.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:19 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
Intellectually dishonest to ignore the rest of my post but you do you
The rest of your post is telling me to go gamble when I’ve already said in this thread that I don’t do that. But yea,leaving that out is intellectual dishonesty
Tell me you’re butthurt about having to smith that poker is in fact a game of chance without actually saying it.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:20 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
Just a moron. It's ok, I understand why you're scared.
Yes
I am absolutely scared of risking my money on absolute nonsense
I wont even enterain the idea
I also dont melt down all over the place for the world to see because I lost my friends 200 grand and my grandmothers 50 grand in one day
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:24 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Tell me you’re butthurt about having to smith that poker is in fact a game of chance without actually saying it.
No one is “butthurt.” We just think you’re uninformed when you think is a game of chance and not a game of skill.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:25 am to lance814
quote:
Poker is a profession to thousands of people. You’re ignorant to think otherwise.
And I offered absolutely no commentary on that other than to accurately point out you were whining about it.
You conveniently chose to ignore the very pointed garbage men question poker bro overlord. Why is that?
quote:
Give me the question y’all are trying to get answered and I’ll answer it for you.
There are lots of them at this point. They were all posted in direct response to you. Go back and read.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:25 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
I'll issue an open to challenge to any of you. Let's play a small sample size of 10k hands in NLHE and see how you do.
Before your time, we actually had a series of SNGs
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:27 am to Caraway Rye
quote:
If someone could always win at poker you would see them on the Forbes 400
You can't always win a poker. Again, you seem to have problems with basic math.
I'll try to help:
If I offered to play a game with you where I would flip a coin. Every time it landed on heads, you pay me $10. Every time it landed on tails, I pay you $20.
Would you play the game?
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:27 am to Caraway Rye
quote:
I also dont melt down all over the place for the world to see because I lost my friends 200 grand and my grandmothers 50 grand in one day
Instead you're melting down over what someone else did and arguing against math.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:29 am to p0845330
quote:
Wut? Um…not really.
Agreed, her plastic face is hideous, but dem titties!!!
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You can't always win a poker. Again, you seem to have problems with basic math.
If its basic math why can you not mathimatically figure out how to always win at poker
You would be the richest person in the world
Oh
Game of chance... sort of a problem
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:31 am to Caraway Rye
quote:
If its basic math why can you not mathimatically figure out how to always win at poker
Dear God how can someone be this dumb?
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:31 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
And I offered absolutely no commentary on that other than to accurately point out you were whining about it. You conveniently chose to ignore the very pointed garbage men question poker bro overlord. Why is that?
There was no whining from me. I was attempting to inform the uninformed.
The garbage man comment was just a mild jab at a troll.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:32 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
you think someone is denying she won the hand.
No, I know people are convinced she cheated she didn’t play the hand by the book and happened to get lucky and win.
And I know you and the rest of the poker bro overlords are twisting yourselves into all kinds of knots trying to convince us novices that’s she had to have cheated, that poker isn’t a game of chance, and literally anything else besides “person that made a dumb decision got lucky and won”
It’s ok though. Your “luck.” post let’s me know you’re not completely insane.
quote:
I'm saying it was a terrible call because it was
But since the random unknown card in the game of chance that was flipped over meant the person that made the stupid bet won, cheating is the only possible explanation.
^ from my second post in this thread.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:32 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Any single hand cn bsoluteky be deduced down to nothing but chance because of situations exactly like this one.
Sure, but play within the hand shouldn't be based on that hand alone. That's part of the imperfect information issue with poker.
There wasn't a single action involved in this hand. If she had even a basic understanding of ranges and combinations, there's no way she could call and honestly think she's making the right decision.
Poker is a game of decisions based on equity within the hand estimated by information in the hand (your cards, the board, etc.) and data outside of the hand (ranges, GTO play, combos, etc.), created by the imperfect information presented (opponent's hand).
This post was edited on 10/1/22 at 11:33 am
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:33 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
Dear God how can someone be this dumb?
I’m convinced caraway is just trolling.
Posted on 10/1/22 at 11:34 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
I know people are convinced she cheated she didn’t play the hand by the book and happened to get lucky and win.
I've never said she cheated. You don't know anything.
Popular
Back to top



0





