Started By
Message

re: The coronavirus may not have originated in China, says Oxford professor

Posted on 7/6/20 at 12:21 pm to
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76241 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

It’ll get blamed on an orange dude

FIFY
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25964 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 12:24 pm to
quote:


i think it's all based off that one sample from Barcelona, when otherwise it just would mean this virus was out earlier than we originally thought (via China)


A highly dubious positive result, if you ask me.

The other samples from other countries puts it in their sewage in late 2019, which is more understandable.

Also, this is all under the assumption that China was honest about the start date in Wuhan of October/November 2019.
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25964 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

quote:

A preprint study, which has not been peer reviewed



Key sentence.


That's not "key." There's been plenty of junk to make it through peer review regarding the pandemic.

"Peer review" does not equate to "gospel truth."
Posted by Jor Jor The Dinosaur
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2014
7585 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Reddit
Email to a friend


Where's the share on Tigerdroppings button?
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57601 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 12:41 pm to
Where it came from is only academically interesting. China's culpability lies, not primarily in the creation of the disease, but in their suppression of information about the spread.
Posted by Tigris
Cloud Cuckoo Land
Member since Jul 2005
13235 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Spanish Flu


Originated in China[/quote]



Haskell County, Kansas, actually

From there it spread to Fort Riley and then the world. And Spain got the blame.
Posted by bopper50
Sugarland Texas
Member since Mar 2009
10268 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:31 pm to
bullshite, everyone knows that it was China.
Posted by Redbone
between St. Amant and Port Vincent
Member since Sep 2012
20738 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:43 pm to
I just dropped in to downvote.

41 others beat me to it.

1 upvote was probably from OP.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53625 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

That's not "key." There's been plenty of junk to make it through peer review regarding the pandemic.


Link to example?


quote:

"Peer review" does not equate to "gospel truth."



I didn’t say it did.

But a preprint literally has little more legitimancy than talking to a scientist over beers at a bar.
Posted by HurricaneTiger
Coral Gables, FL
Member since Jan 2014
3255 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

The coronavirus may have been lying dormant across the world until emerging under favourable environmental conditions


And that would be every climate from around the globe? Yeah, alright.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
64081 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:57 pm to
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
21618 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

New York in Trump Tower


“We crap the best viruses.”
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25964 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Link to example?


Here's an easy resource. - Retraction Watch.

Obviously not all journals are created equally, but there is that pair from the same group that were retracted, one in The Lancet and the other in the New England Journal of Medicine, because they used made up data from Sugisphere.

Also, there was that one in Nature by the Imperial College modelling folks that attributed an ~80% decrease in virus transmission on the exact day countries enacted stay at home orders, showing that other, previous mitigation efforts didn't work. Yet, for some reason, Sweden had that same ~80% decrease in transmission despite not having a shutdown order, with those mitigation efforts that didn't work in other countries working for them...
(This paper was submitted March 30th, Accepted May 22nd, Published online June 8th, that means they started on this thing before it peaked in New York.)

There's this one from PNAS with various "experts" calling it out. (Those are three separate links.)
This post was edited on 7/6/20 at 3:08 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram