Started By
Message
locked post

The bundling of Internet content has begun and its about to get worse

Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:00 am
Posted by TJGator1215
FL/TN
Member since Sep 2011
14174 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:00 am
quote:

Last year we won the open internet back, but the new regulations had one big weakness: they didn’t explicitly ban a scheme called “zero rating.” Zero rating is a poison pill wrapped in a piece of cheese; it looks like a good thing for consumers (free video!), but ultimately has the capability to rot competition and the open internet. The FCC decided it would look at zero rating schemes on a case-by-case basis, which left the door open for wireless companies to play their usual games. AT&T just broke that door off its hinges.

Last night AT&T made a dim prophecy official by announcing that its new DirecTV Now streaming service would be zero rated: it won’t count against its customers’ data caps. Zero rating isn’t new — T-Mobile has been writing the manual on how to get away with it — but now it’s finally happening at a scale that matters. And AT&T’s version is much worse than T-Mobile’s.



quote:

But AT&T’s zero rating model is pretty much the nightmare scenario that internet advocates and pro-competition observers have been warning us about. That’s because AT&T owns DirecTV, and is now giving DirecTV Now privileged access to AT&T’s wireless internet customers. The corruption is so obvious here that it doesn’t need a fancy net neutrality metaphor — AT&T is clearly favoring a company it now owns over competitors.


quote:

And that’s just the beginning of where AT&T is screwing us. The company stands to reap massive tolls on the other end of that “most favored nation” deal with DirecTV, because it also offers something called “sponsored data” to other companies that want the same kind of privileged access to AT&T customers. So, for example, if Netflix wants to compete fairly with DirecTV, it would need to pay AT&T to exempt its video traffic from data caps.



quote:

They’re using the same playbook: turn the internet into basic cable, and charge everyone for features and content on top of that. Then, charge competitors to compete with their own vertically integrated video services. It’s a two-way toll that ISPs have been trying to erect forever.



quote:

The stakes are even higher now that AT&T plans to buy Time Warner: the company that owns Game of Thrones and Batman. Will AT&T make HBO free to stream only for AT&T customers in the future? Will AT&T have to pay Verizon to sponsor HBO data for its customers, or will Verizon capitulate and offer HBO data for free to remain competitive? These are the kinds of byzantine deals that an open internet is designed to avoid. The core principle of net neutrality is that you should be deciding who wins and loses in the market for information, not the phone company.


LINK
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 12:04 am
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19940 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:01 am to
This thread sucks and you suck for making it.
Posted by pioneerbasketball
Team Bunchie
Member since Oct 2005
139098 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:02 am to
(no message)
Posted by UF
Florida
Member since Nov 2016
2696 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:02 am to
Explica por favor
Posted by Signal Soldier
30.411994,-91.183929
Member since Dec 2010
8606 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:03 am to
(no message)
Posted by LSU Tiger 216
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
4036 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:07 am to
Wow this is stupid
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George, LA
Member since Aug 2004
80813 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:18 am to
This was going to happen sooner or later and it does suck.
Posted by UF
Florida
Member since Nov 2016
2696 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:23 am to
Posted by DontCare
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2012
2516 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:26 am to
I don't understand why internet users are so unaware of and indifferent to net neutrality issues. Cheers for posting this.

If you're interested, here is an interview with Manuel de Landa on the subject: LINK.
Posted by UF
Florida
Member since Nov 2016
2696 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:27 am to
Well if someone could explain it, then people might care.
Posted by TJGator1215
FL/TN
Member since Sep 2011
14174 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:30 am to
quote:

In simple terms, net neutrality is the means for every internet user to freely access any content or application without restrictions. Once you pay for the data through your respective ISP, you have the freedom to access anything on the internet and at the same speed.

If I understand this correctly now you can access any website and streaming site at the same baseline speed. If NN Is gone ISPs can throttle the speeds to certain sites that either they don't own or don't pay for faster speeds. I could be wrong on this.
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 12:46 am
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
64450 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:31 am to
quote:

Well if someone could explain it, then people might care.

it's not rocket science
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21087 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:36 am to
Explain to me how this isn't (plain old) capitalism....?

You do have many other mobile Internet options
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 12:37 am
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
16134 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 2:36 am to
Bon voyage the golden age of the internet
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 3:15 am to
I'm so glad I don't have data caps to worry about. They are terrible.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53586 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 3:37 am to
I'm kind of a similar mind.

I know the slippery slope arguments, but I don't mind these types of preferences and demanding payment for privileged access....as long as they remain in the wireless application.

Wireless bandwidth is at a premium, especially for video. So moves like this are just business strategies.

Stepping one toe in the wired realm however........
Posted by BunkieWrench
Katy
Member since Nov 2008
5734 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 4:59 am to
John Oliver on Net Neutrality.

I think this aired 2 years ago.
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 5:19 am to
quote:

Wireless bandwidth is at a premium, especially for video. So moves like this are just business strategies.

Stepping one toe in the wired realm however........



If ATT buys time Warner and now only att customers can watch game of thrones unlimited for free but everyone else has to pay to watch it and pay extra to watch it as much as they want you're OK with that?
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 5:29 am
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 5:20 am to
Internet should be all or nothing. No throttle.
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 5:28 am to
quote:

Explain to me how this isn't (plain old) capitalism....?

You do have many other mobile Internet options



Mobile Internet options?

It's ATT. They own Direct TV. A major competition for cable. Some places where cable can't reach its your only option, and some places with shite reception you can't get it.

They own direct tv, and a massive mobile company and now they want to buy time Warner.

This cannot be allowed to happen. You cannot allow the Internet to turn into a channel based basic cable subscription service.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram