- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The bundling of Internet content has begun and its about to get worse
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:00 am
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:00 am
quote:
Last year we won the open internet back, but the new regulations had one big weakness: they didn’t explicitly ban a scheme called “zero rating.” Zero rating is a poison pill wrapped in a piece of cheese; it looks like a good thing for consumers (free video!), but ultimately has the capability to rot competition and the open internet. The FCC decided it would look at zero rating schemes on a case-by-case basis, which left the door open for wireless companies to play their usual games. AT&T just broke that door off its hinges.
Last night AT&T made a dim prophecy official by announcing that its new DirecTV Now streaming service would be zero rated: it won’t count against its customers’ data caps. Zero rating isn’t new — T-Mobile has been writing the manual on how to get away with it — but now it’s finally happening at a scale that matters. And AT&T’s version is much worse than T-Mobile’s.
quote:
But AT&T’s zero rating model is pretty much the nightmare scenario that internet advocates and pro-competition observers have been warning us about. That’s because AT&T owns DirecTV, and is now giving DirecTV Now privileged access to AT&T’s wireless internet customers. The corruption is so obvious here that it doesn’t need a fancy net neutrality metaphor — AT&T is clearly favoring a company it now owns over competitors.
quote:
And that’s just the beginning of where AT&T is screwing us. The company stands to reap massive tolls on the other end of that “most favored nation” deal with DirecTV, because it also offers something called “sponsored data” to other companies that want the same kind of privileged access to AT&T customers. So, for example, if Netflix wants to compete fairly with DirecTV, it would need to pay AT&T to exempt its video traffic from data caps.
quote:
They’re using the same playbook: turn the internet into basic cable, and charge everyone for features and content on top of that. Then, charge competitors to compete with their own vertically integrated video services. It’s a two-way toll that ISPs have been trying to erect forever.
quote:
The stakes are even higher now that AT&T plans to buy Time Warner: the company that owns Game of Thrones and Batman. Will AT&T make HBO free to stream only for AT&T customers in the future? Will AT&T have to pay Verizon to sponsor HBO data for its customers, or will Verizon capitulate and offer HBO data for free to remain competitive? These are the kinds of byzantine deals that an open internet is designed to avoid. The core principle of net neutrality is that you should be deciding who wins and loses in the market for information, not the phone company.
LINK
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 12:04 am
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:01 am to TJGator1215
This thread sucks and you suck for making it.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:18 am to TJGator1215
This was going to happen sooner or later and it does suck.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:26 am to TJGator1215
I don't understand why internet users are so unaware of and indifferent to net neutrality issues. Cheers for posting this.
If you're interested, here is an interview with Manuel de Landa on the subject: LINK.
If you're interested, here is an interview with Manuel de Landa on the subject: LINK.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:27 am to DontCare
Well if someone could explain it, then people might care.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:30 am to UF
quote:
In simple terms, net neutrality is the means for every internet user to freely access any content or application without restrictions. Once you pay for the data through your respective ISP, you have the freedom to access anything on the internet and at the same speed.
If I understand this correctly now you can access any website and streaming site at the same baseline speed. If NN Is gone ISPs can throttle the speeds to certain sites that either they don't own or don't pay for faster speeds. I could be wrong on this.
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 12:46 am
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:31 am to UF
quote:
Well if someone could explain it, then people might care.
it's not rocket science
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:36 am to TJGator1215
Explain to me how this isn't (plain old) capitalism....?
You do have many other mobile Internet options
You do have many other mobile Internet options
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 12:37 am
Posted on 12/1/16 at 2:36 am to TJGator1215
Bon voyage the golden age of the internet
Posted on 12/1/16 at 3:15 am to TJGator1215
I'm so glad I don't have data caps to worry about. They are terrible.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 3:37 am to Shankopotomus
I'm kind of a similar mind.
I know the slippery slope arguments, but I don't mind these types of preferences and demanding payment for privileged access....as long as they remain in the wireless application.
Wireless bandwidth is at a premium, especially for video. So moves like this are just business strategies.
Stepping one toe in the wired realm however........
I know the slippery slope arguments, but I don't mind these types of preferences and demanding payment for privileged access....as long as they remain in the wireless application.
Wireless bandwidth is at a premium, especially for video. So moves like this are just business strategies.
Stepping one toe in the wired realm however........
Posted on 12/1/16 at 4:59 am to TJGator1215
Posted on 12/1/16 at 5:19 am to Volvagia
quote:
Wireless bandwidth is at a premium, especially for video. So moves like this are just business strategies.
Stepping one toe in the wired realm however........
If ATT buys time Warner and now only att customers can watch game of thrones unlimited for free but everyone else has to pay to watch it and pay extra to watch it as much as they want you're OK with that?
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 5:29 am
Posted on 12/1/16 at 5:20 am to TJGator1215
Internet should be all or nothing. No throttle.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 5:28 am to Shankopotomus
quote:
Explain to me how this isn't (plain old) capitalism....?
You do have many other mobile Internet options
Mobile Internet options?
It's ATT. They own Direct TV. A major competition for cable. Some places where cable can't reach its your only option, and some places with shite reception you can't get it.
They own direct tv, and a massive mobile company and now they want to buy time Warner.
This cannot be allowed to happen. You cannot allow the Internet to turn into a channel based basic cable subscription service.
Popular
Back to top

20













