Started By
Message

re: The Advocate on Algae in City Park Lake

Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:35 am to
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34146 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:35 am to
So the carp will compete with resources with many species of piranhas found in the lakes, that's the problem?
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 6:43 am to


These pictures are hilariously absurd

Someone needs to shop lootie wading in the water
Posted by tonydtigr
Beautiful Downtown Glenn Springs,Tx
Member since Nov 2011
5098 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 8:05 am to
quote:

With what we pay to BREC, and their cash reserves, there is zero reason any residents of this parish should pay ANY additional taxes for this project. It does need attention though.


I agree that it seems they should pay for it, but as was mentioned in the other thread earlier this week about this, BREC does not own the lakes, just a few parks on the edge of the lakes.

OP (not you, dragginass) must be too young to remember how this algae bloom was always a yearly occurrence back in the late 1960's and early 70's along with fish kills. That was what prompted the original dredging operation. (Incidentally, I knew a guy who worked on that original dredge and had part of his hand cut off in the equipment.)

So here we are years down the road, and the lake has reverted to it's 1960's condition. It's well past time to fix this problem by dredging and begin a maintenance program, because each summer from here on out it's only going to get worse.
If BREC doesn't, then I hope someone will step up with some cash for this project.

It's yet another embarrassment to us when all these travelers from out of state see how shitty Baton Rouge is, while they are stuck on the interstate over our lakes in one of our daily traffic jams.
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12298 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 8:09 am to
quote:


The problem with City Park Lake is that it wasn't dug deep enough. Why don't they just dig the bastard deeper?


$$$$$

Pass a parish wide tax to pay for it in an election.
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
48838 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 8:10 am to
quote:

They dug it deeper thirty plus years ago, but over the years with no maintenance it fills in.




City Park Lake was not dredged. University Lake was partially dredged and had the stumps removed.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98714 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 8:15 am to
quote:

Baton Rouge Lakes Master Plan


Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too many crackers in those pictures.

BREC ain't never gonna pay for that.
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
27092 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Copper Sulfate ...It works, treat half the surface area now the other half in a month, the algae will disappear and the fish will live, repeat applications may be necessary in the future, talking thousands, maybe tens of thousands, but no where near millions of dollars


That's a terrible long-term plan. Copper sulfate only treats the symptom, and not the cause. It will work in clearing up the algae, but the algae will come back. You'll have to treat again. The algae will come back. You'll have to treat again. Etc.

Copper sulfate will build up along the bottom and create a sterile zone where animals and plants cannot live. It will runoff down Bayou Duplantier and eventually end up in Lake Maurepas, where copper sulfate is known to be toxic to saltwater invertebrates such as crabs, shrimp, and oysters. It will also build up in the soil of the lake and make it harder to dispose of the muck when it's eventually dredged.

A more holistic approach is needed. You need to treat the water before it ever ends up in the lake, and then you need to make sure that once the water is there that it stays healthy.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57209 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 8:58 am to
Both of those lakes need to be filled in and trees planted. They're an eyesore and not worth the trouble any more if people aren't willing to pay to maintain them. The same goes for that nasty Campus Lake across from the Ag Center.
This post was edited on 9/27/19 at 10:12 am
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17258 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 10:13 am to
quote:

That's a terrible long-term plan.


but why not use it right now for the immediate problem? any long-term plan is going to take years to develop , fund and execute. My feelings is they do not want to clean up the algae right now because they want it to look bad when they come asking for money
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57209 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 10:14 am to
quote:

LSU will never approve spending a bunch of money on that with their budget issues.


Dredging the lakes will not increase diversity at the university, so F'king isn't interested.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
57475 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 10:15 am to
We could also dump a couple thousand gallons of diesel into the lake and set it on fire.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57209 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 10:15 am to
quote:

If that were the case, why hasn't this been a problem in the past? It's not like the lake got more shallow all of the sudden.



This has been, and the lakes have gotten shallower due to sediment runoff and such. Stinky fish kills and algae blooms used to be a very common occurrence for the lakes prior to them being dredged in the 1980's.
This post was edited on 9/27/19 at 10:22 am
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57209 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Stumps, Money, what do you do with the spoil etc.


Were you around in the early 80's when the lakes were last dredged? The sinker cypress pulled from those lakes were impressive (so I doubt stumps are no longer an issue), and the spoil was used to create peninsulas (Baton Rouge Beach, for one) along both lakes.
This post was edited on 9/27/19 at 10:20 am
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
57475 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 10:22 am to
quote:

If that were the case, why hasn't this been a problem in the past? It's not like the lake got more shallow all of the sudden.



Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57209 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 10:24 am to
quote:

The people living in the neighborhoods around it, BREC and LSU needs to bankroll it. They are who benefits from it. I don't feel like all taxpayers need to all jump in on this.



This is the exact reason why things don't get done in this parish.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36017 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 10:59 am to
quote:

but why not use it right now for the immediate problem? any long-term plan is going to take years to develop , fund and execute. My feelings is they do not want to clean up the algae right now because they want it to look bad when they come asking for money


You know how it works, create a crisis, tell the folks you need millions to fix it, raise taxes and then hire a PM, divide the pie, and with what’s left fix the problem.
Posted by tigbob
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
204 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:31 am to
LINK

Caney lake was a monster bass lake back in the day. Carp where introduced and destroyed the fishing habitat. They cleaned it out. Introduced to many carp. People where encouraged to go bow fishing to clean out the carp. I fished there before the carp and the grass was bad but fishing was great. Seems to finally making a come back!
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
27092 posts
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:10 pm to
Maybe they've used it several times in the past and are concerned about using it again? Not everything is a conspiracy.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram