Started By
Message

The 2022 Toyota Tundra TRD Pro Has A Lower Payload Rating Than The Ford Ranger

Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:43 pm
Posted by rickgrimes
Member since Jan 2011
4178 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:43 pm
quote:

The new Toyota Tundra is a big truck, no doubt about it. Well, it is a full-size pickup, which means that most drivers would expect correspondingly big numbers on its spec sheet, but the ’22 Tundra is beat by some smaller trucks in important specs, such as payload. Any single Ranger that Ford currently makes has a max payload higher than Toyota’s gnarliest new Tundra, the TRD Pro.

The TRD Pro has a max payload of 1,455 pounds, as Expedition Portal noted. The Ranger, on the other hand, will support from 1,478 pounds up to 1,905 pounds, depending on the trim. Notice that the term carmakers usually steer you towards is “up to.”

The new Tundra’s payload rating is up to 1,940 pounds, but the TRD Pro will carry much less. Funny how the “up to” phrase doesn’t apply to price, though. When discussing price, the clause is almost always “starting at.” Toyota is not the only company that does this; all carmakers do this. Phrases like “up to” and “starting at” are common practice.

But it’s a practice that, in this case, can make the Tundra’s specs confusing to those who aren’t familiar with pickups. There’s a difference between trucks that can tow and haul, and those that are considered performance trucks. The Tundra TRD Pro is very much in the performance camp.

LINK
Posted by olemissfan26
MS
Member since Apr 2012
6228 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:52 pm to
People that buy TRD pros aren’t getting them to pull shite

Might have a yeti in the back
Posted by ProbyOne
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2004
1913 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:52 pm to
Apples vs oranges

It even says so in your post

It’s a “performance truck” whatever that means. Built for weekend baja warriors lol
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118790 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:54 pm to
This is normal for all brands. Did you read it before posting?
Posted by bbarras85
Member since Jul 2021
1964 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:58 pm to
By no means I am a Toyota advocate because I hate them. But the TRD Pro is in line with the other brands specialty trucks. The Raptor and the trx have a much lower payload than the F-150 and the Ram because of the added weight of the suspension system and the general fact that they are not meant to carry a load. Will they do it? Yes, but not as well as the normal models.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15414 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 9:16 pm to
Maybe you should’ve used your brain a little before posting propaganda
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76124 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

The new Tundra’s payload rating is up to 1,940 pounds


Seems like it should be higher
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27229 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 9:39 pm to

Posted by PoppaD
Texas
Member since Feb 2008
4866 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

Seems like it should be higher


It easily could be higher, but the chief engineer on the TFL video of the launch clearly said ride comfort and quality were top considerations for the truck. They put rear coil over suspension to make the ride better. They could have gone back with leaf springs, increased payload, and made ride quality suffer. But that was not there goal.

Its funny people don't think Toyota has researched the market. They have and they found a lot of new truck buyers are coming from Luxury Suv's. They also know most people don't max out payload. They also know your average guy tows about 8000 pounds max and is more of a weekend warrior type then an everyday tower.

So they set out to build a truck that rides like a luxury vehicle and has extra towing capacity for the average guy, but they weren't trying to be class leaders in towing or payload.

We will see if they hit what the market wants or not.

Posted by AllDayEveryDay
Nawf Tejas
Member since Jun 2015
6996 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 10:41 pm to
This truck is marketed for the Dallas real estate professional that doesn't want to lease a range Rover but wants something masculine.
Posted by RadBro
Member since Aug 2012
969 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 11:21 pm to
TRX is only 1400
Posted by Abstract Queso Dip
Member since Mar 2021
5878 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 12:35 am to
I have a cousin that is high up in production... The basic package is poor branding. It is the equivalent of calling a Ford ranger s full sized truck. A few years ago the boss tundras were better than most American brands. Dude started out on production line and then moved up to logistics, quality control, and supply chains. Sly country boy that isn't afraid to tell truth or talk shite. Will ask him for some input on this. He got a basic degree in industrial manufacturing... Basically an advanced level of welding/process type stuff but below and engineering degree. Had a couple of friends do this at state and all of them upper level management at car manufacturers. Basically a welding hands on type degree with business mixed in... Kinda wish I would have gone that route as opposed to finance. Straight shooter with the ability to have say so in manufacturing processes. Kinda of a mechanical engineering but with more emphasis on application experience in college.
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10560 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 5:00 am to
quote:

no means I am a Toyota advocate because I hate them


Why do you hate them?
Posted by Swazla
Member since Jul 2016
1434 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 6:26 am to
He’s right. The new Tundra and the new Tacoma will share the same basic chassis.

This was announced a couple of years ago in Automotive News then never mentioned again.

The aggressive front end is to make it look bigger than it is
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67478 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 6:32 am to
quote:

People that buy TRD pros aren’t getting them to pull shite

The Raptor crowd agrees with this
Posted by NoBoDawg
Member since Feb 2014
1552 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 7:12 am to
quote:

no means I am a Toyota advocate because I hate them

He obviously hates long term reliability & high resale too.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32421 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 7:16 am to
Sorry you can’t pony up for one
Posted by Lazy But Talented
Member since Aug 2011
14434 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 7:26 am to
quote:

This truck is marketed for the Dallas real estate professional that doesn't want to lease a range Rover but wants something masculine.



Posted by Dixie Normus
Earth
Member since Sep 2013
2628 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Its funny people don't think Toyota has researched the market. They have and they found a lot of new truck buyers are coming from Luxury Suv's. They also know most people don't max out payload. They also know your average guy tows about 8000 pounds max and is more of a weekend warrior type then an everyday tower.


This. I’m switching from a car to a hybrid tundra next year most likely. I have no need for a truck with my job and may hitch a trailer to it once a year or so. I’m only buying one because I really just want something I can throw shite in the back of when needed. I hate having to ask a buddy to borrow their truck when I need one so I’m just getting my own.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32063 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 7:29 am to
quote:

The 2022 Toyota Tundra TRD Pro Has A Lower Payload Rating Than The Ford Ranger



The Ford Raptor has a lower payload rating than the Honda Ridgeline.

so if you need to use your truck as a truck....buy the Honda.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram