- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:04 pm to Darth_Vader
I bet its hitting harder than Mike Tyson too
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:06 pm to KG6
quote:
I don't know if she has a case against the school. I certainly think it's unfortunate and terrible for her. But she brought something to school with naked pics of her on it. Happened to be a phone that a kid could easily get into. What if she would have brought a book with naked pics of her in it. If someone would have found out she was carrying that around, she would have been fired I'm sure. Even if she kept it in her purse and it was personal, not intended for kids to have access.
She certainly does have a case. Her rights were violated by a student. Theft is a crime.
Also the "what if" game is not an argument that bears the weight of scrutiny. Because what you said did not happen, do it is irrelevant to the case at hand. Try harder.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:06 pm to KG6
Equating someone's phone with a nudie mag is a completely ridiculous argument.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:07 pm to CaptainBrannigan
Sure she may be able to sue the student. but the school? Fact remains she brought nude pics and maybe porn to school. Anyone who says she didn't is just being naive.
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:09 pm to Darth_Vader
Now that kid is going to be scared for life, all bc the teacher made her phone easily accessible. What a bitch
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:09 pm to Darth_Vader
Sounds like the student thief distributed pornographic material to minors.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:10 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
No different that having a magazine in her purse or desk with porn in it. And hopefully the student will be expelled too.
This is also why you're a dumb arse.
She is fricked in SC, but in Louisiana you boys should take note that this is very much illegal now, even if you take a picture of a chick. You best be careful sharing that shite.
This kid would easily be arrested under new La law.
LINK
quote:
The person intentionally discloses an image of another person who is
seventeen years of age or older, who is identifiable from the image or information
displayed in connection with the image, and whose intimate parts are exposed in
whole or in part.
(2) The person who discloses the image obtained it under circumstances in
which a reasonable person would know or understand that the image was to remain
private.
(4) The person who discloses the image has the intent to harass or cause
emotional distress to the person in the image, or the person who commits the offense
knew or should have known that the disclosure could harass or cause emotional
distress to the person in the image.
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:17 pm to mikelbr
you can resort to playground name calling all you want. But She still brought nude pics and porn to school.
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:17 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
A student stole teacher Leigh Anne Arthur’s cell phone, found a nude picture on the device, then sent the image to other students through text messages and social media.
That may be the best excuse yet.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:17 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Equating someone's phone with a nudie mag is a completely ridiculous argument.
How. The base fact of the matter is she had nude pictures (doesn't make a shite difference if it was of her or not) at school. The medium in which she brought them to school does not matter. Again, I'm not for firing her. I do think her rights were violated by the student. Doesn't mean at the base of the matter, what she had with her was inappropriate to have at school.
I make the reference to the magazine, because that stands out to us as wrong. But to put it in a little black square electronic device, which is just as easily accessible as turning a page of a magazine, is somehow different. "But it was her personal phone, blah blah blah". It could have been her personal magazine or photo album in her purse. It's the same thing.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:21 pm to KG6
Well, for starters, one has the sole purpose of distributing pornography, the other does not. If they went through her internet browser and found a porn website on her browsing history, would that be the same as well?
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:28 pm to upgrayedd
That's slightly different, but there is still the argument that she allowed access to internet sites that would usually be blocked by the schools browser. If the school had laptops that blocked those websites, but she brought a laptop from home and left it to where kids could access, I'd say she may still get in trouble. Now, I would have a different opinion about all of this if the phone was protected with a password (same for the computer)
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:31 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I am not talking about the kid you idiot. See how easy personal attacks are. She brought nude pics and porn to school.
That's a gross oversimplification.
If schools want to demand all staff have passcodes on their phones then sure, but your logic about possession of porn at school is far-fetched and just typical for your arguments aka DUMB.
What if the kid uses her phone to google BBW Titties? Is that her fricking fault he's looking porn on her phone?
MY post about La's new law is indicative of the culture change to a "connected" society. I'm proud our state has done something like that b/c it's no longer a stigma to have or share intimate media between consenting adults(17+).
And dick-moves like this or ex-lovers posting on facebook(I have a gal friend who's ex did this 3 years ago BADDDD. very graphic shite all over FB for a few hours) can now be prosecuted under the same premise of a 'connected society'.
If none of that makes sense to you, then go watch old Ron Jeremy VHS porn.
quote:
That's slightly different, but there is still the argument that she allowed access to internet sites that would usually be blocked by the schools browser. If the school had laptops that blocked those websites, but she brought a laptop from home and left it to where kids could access, I'd say she may still get in trouble. Now, I would have a different opinion about all of this if the phone was protected with a password (same for the computer)
That's about only way any of this gets addressed. All devices must use facility wifi for connectivity.
Side note.
I was at OLOM Saturday for Quizbowl. Their guest wifi didn't allow facebook. I didn't realize I was on it and was like WTF.
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:32 pm to KG6
I'm talking about the browser on her phone.
Password on her phone is irrelevant. She either has protection of private, inherently innocent property, or she doesn't.
How would it be different if there was a password?
Password on her phone is irrelevant. She either has protection of private, inherently innocent property, or she doesn't.
How would it be different if there was a password?
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:33 pm to mikelbr
quote:
She should be able to sue the shite out of the kid as well.
sounds like a lucrative endeavor.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:35 pm to upgrayedd
Because it was obviously was accessible. Password makes it not accessible. Having that accessible to students (even if the student had to break a rule to get to it) is a problem. You know, because children tend to break rules sometimes.
I totally think this sucks for her. I would not want to be the principal and I'd try to find a way to not do this if I was. But I think if I was a lawyer, I could fight on behalf of the school district easily if needed.
I totally think this sucks for her. I would not want to be the principal and I'd try to find a way to not do this if I was. But I think if I was a lawyer, I could fight on behalf of the school district easily if needed.
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:36 pm to Darth_Vader
In order to make a stance on this situation, I need to see the pic first. Can someone email it to me?
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:36 pm to KG6
So if the kid hacks into her phone and gets around her password, all is forgiven?
FWIW, I think the school should be able to hire/fire at their own discretion.
FWIW, I think the school should be able to hire/fire at their own discretion.
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:37 pm to mikelbr
quote:
If schools want to demand all staff have passcodes on their phones then sure, but your logic about possession of porn at school is far-fetched and just typical for your arguments aka DUMB. What if the kid uses her phone to google BBW Titties? Is that her fricking fault he's looking porn on her phone?
Did shet have nudes in her phone on school property? Yes or no? I'll answer for you. Yes, she did. It's not an oversimplification; it's what she did.
Oh and the kid did not Google nudies in her phone browser. Stick to the facts. Such as her bringing nude digital pics on school property.
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 12:41 pm
Page 3 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News