- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Teacher forced to resign after student steals her phone and shares nude pics
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:14 pm to NoHoTiger
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:14 pm to NoHoTiger
quote:
You have you fricking tard.
If you're not gonna read posts or even try to comprehend, not sure why you'd bother posting.
I've legit said the complete opposite of what you just claimed probably 4-5 times, but I'm the retard. Interesting.
Embarassing.
quote:W
Implying that as long as it's easy to access it's not the kid's fault is pretty much saying it's not the kid's fault.
T
F
We've been talking about the teacher's role in this for pages, try to keep up.
1
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:15 pm to shel311
No, you didn't.
You've been dancing around the point be cause you have no idea what you're talking about.
Go play in your sandbox and let the adults talk.
You've been dancing around the point be cause you have no idea what you're talking about.
Go play in your sandbox and let the adults talk.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:15 pm to shel311
quote:
We've been talking about the teacher's role in this for pages, try to keep up.
Was answering your previous question.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:15 pm to AwesomeSauce
Doesn't matter how easy it was to access it for the kid's responsibility.
Obviously does for the teacher's responsibility.
Tada
Obviously does for the teacher's responsibility.
Tada
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:16 pm to upgrayedd
quote:Don't get pissy because you suck at reading.
No, you didn't. You've been dancing around the point be cause you have no idea what you're talking about. Go play in your sandbox and let the adults talk.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:16 pm to shel311
quote:
Doesn't matter how easy it was to access it for the kid's responsibility.
True
quote:
Obviously does for the teacher's responsibility.
False
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:16 pm to NoHoTiger
quote:Virtually every post I've made was in a discussion about the teacher's role in this.
Was answering your previous question.
The kid's role is a very easy one for me, it's wrong and he should face whatever punihsment comes about for distributing stuff like that that wasn't his to distribute.
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:18 pm to shel311
quote:
Doesn't matter how easy it was to access it for the kid's responsibility.
quote:
quote: But in general, yea if the kid had to hack into her phone bypassing security stops, yea it's a huge freaking difference than if nothing is protected and he could very easily access content
You quite literally can't get your argument straight.
This is like arguing with a 6 year old.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:18 pm to shel311
quote:
Virtually every post I've made was in a discussion about the teacher's role in this.
Why are you even arguing this? The teacher had no responsiblity in this, IMO. The kid stole her private property. Accessed her private property. And distributed her private property. How easy it was to do this neither negates what he did nor makes this more her fault.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:19 pm to shel311
quote:
How the kid was able to access the info is obviously important in determining the teacher's role/responsibility in this,
If the kid had to commit theft then I would say you should drop this point.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:19 pm to upgrayedd
quote:Yep, that's exactly what I said. It's a huge difference for the TEACHER'S ROLE, which was the entire premise of that entire subsection of debate.
You quite literally can't get your argument straight. This is like arguing with a 6 year old.
Go read all of the previous posts, it's very obvious what that discussion was in regards to.
Sorry you can't keep up and are now lashing out and namecalling.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:21 pm to shel311
I just quoted what you said, dummy.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:21 pm to NoHoTiger
quote:Why are you?
Why are you even arguing this?
quote:I disagree IMO. Are you insinuating that no one who disagrees with you should argue this? I'm confused.
The teacher had no responsiblity in this, IMO
quote:Agreed, not sure how many times I have to say that.
The kid stole her private property
quote:Holy shite, again with this?
Accessed her private property. And distributed her private property. How easy it was to do this neither negates what he did nor makes this more her fault.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:23 pm to AwesomeSauce
quote:So in a complete hypothetical, not this exact situation, if someone commits a theft but in doing so, uncovers something you're doing illegally, you'd say that's irrelevant and that point should be dropped and you get a free pass for breaking the law because someone was committing a theft?
If the kid had to commit theft then I would say you should drop this point.
That's your basic logic, and it makes no sense. We can debate all night about whether we THINK what she possessed was wrong or not to have at school, but if you're breaking a law/rule it doesn't really matter how that comes to light, if it comes to light, you still should be responsible for your law/rule breaking.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:24 pm to upgrayedd
quote:Read it again, where in that quote did I say it was about the kid, specifically? I didn't say it was about the teacher either, but it's easily implied given that was the entire argument for probably 3-5 pages now.
I just quoted what you said, dummy.
Resorting to namecalling, brilliant. And telling on your part.
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:26 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
I just quoted what you said, dummy.
Full quote:
quote:
See my example above this post.
But in general, yea if the kid had to hack into her phone bypassing security stops, yea it's a huge freaking difference than if nothing is protected and he could very easily access content not allowed at school. Obviously
Example above that post:
quote:
Let me ask you, if your vehicle is in a school parking lot that is a gun free zone and someone breaks into your car and steals that gun then turns it in to the principal, are you saying you shouldn't get into any trouble for breaking the rules based on a technicality becuase someone broke into your car?
Tada!!
Now, run along, troll.
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 4:29 pm
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:29 pm to NoHoTiger
No one is questioning if what she did was legal. However the school does have the right to ask her to resign or even fire her for having pornography on school property.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:30 pm to shel311
quote:
but if you're breaking a law/rule it doesn't really matter how that comes to light, if it comes to light, you still should be responsible for your law/rule breaking.
Actually, this is also not black and white.
quote:
uncovers something you're doing illegally
And she wasn't doing anything illegal.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:30 pm to shel311
quote:
uncovers something you're doing illegally
Exchanging pictures with one's spouse is illegal?
quote:
If you're breaking a law/rule it doesn't really matter how that comes to light, if it comes to light, you still should be responsible for your law/rule breaking.
There is no law. Unless the fact that there is no policy against this from the article implies that this rule did in fact exist it was just super duper top secret.
You are implying a law where one does not in fact exist. It is in fact illegal for her to give the student a picture but not illegal for her to have one. Is it good practice? No, but that does not make it illegal.
Posted on 3/1/16 at 4:30 pm to NoHoTiger
quote:
And she wasn't doing anything illegal.
quote:
So in a complete hypothetical, not this exact situation, if someone commits a theft but in doing so, uncovers something you're doing illegally, you'd say that's irrelevant and that point should be dropped and you get a free pass for breaking the law because someone was committing a theft?
Page 12 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News