re: Tangipahoa Parish rape victim ordered to pay her abuser child support

quote:

---

Where do you live? You are certainly taking a very personal level of interest in this.

---

quote:

---

attending doctor working the ER should be trained and qualified to perform that exam

---

quote:

---

opposite side couldn’t call bull shite on the results.

---

quote:

---

I’m really interested in how this case plays out but I’m to the point of not wanting to read any more of Bronc’s post. She repeats herself constantly and creates an argument when there doesn’t need to be one. She seems like the type that believes everything CNN tells the people. We should just listen to her and not question anything. Bronc, go hang out with your husband on this Saturday evening, reading your post are wearisome, and for that reason….I’m out.

---

quote:

---

1.) Who thought he was the father of this baby? This girl did not exist in a vacuum and had a family of some sort. She admitted she allowed them to think it was the boyfriend's baby. So did this boy just never come around? Think he had paternity for 5 years and then boom?

---

quote:

---

2.) How did Barnes find out about the baby? It's interesting he didn't at least know she was pregnant, considering they had close mutual friends. Hammond/Ponchatoula is a small area with very close knit groups. Kind of a one degree of separation type of place.

---

quote:

---

You go look for it since you are the one that apparently knows everything and people who have seen and heard this info first hand know nothing

---

quote:

---

“Lost custody over a cell phone and then was forced to pay child support…” well, let’s look at that statement.

Because the father had provided a cell phone for the last five years prior to this with age appropriate parental controls without social media and it was monitored as a parent should. Both parents communicated freely with the child on that phone for years that the father paid for. Mom was providing ghost phones to this child that had multiple social media apps/profiles belonging to the minor child.

Furthermore, the mother went on to coerce and enable the child to hide it from Dad. In fact, mom actually punished her one weekend when the dad found one of the phones bc in mom’s words “you know it was never supposed to leave this house.” Dad found the phones. All three of them.

Wait! The mother provided a ghost phone to hide from dad, coaches the child to hide it, then punished her when Dad found it at his house? Yep. They would not give the codes to the dad even after being ordered by the judge to do so. So she was held in contempt. However, dad was eventually able to get into the phones and was able to see what the daughter was being allowed to do when she was in the custody of the mother every other week.

From the unsealed documents it was proven the daughter was being allowed to do the same things the mother was doing at the same age!!! Not only be allowed to do, but actually supported by the mother and the mother fostered that behavior with the 18 year old male the child was in a relationship with unknown to Dad that mother was hiding from the dad. The relationship that the mother was fostering and coercing/coaching both the 15 and 18 year old to hide because if Dad found out he would get the 18 year old in trouble. Adult things a 15 year old should not be doing!!

She was being allowed to live a party lifestyle, one some adults would be envious of, and run the show in her mother’s home. However, in Dad’s home there was structure, discipline, age appropriate responsibilities, accountability, and a standard of expectations appropriate to a 15 year old child. The child didn’t run the show nor was she living a partying lifestyle. The dad is not a Dad that chooses to raise his child through a cell and social media like so many other parents do. In short, Dad shut down the party lifestyle!

Now after court hearings the mother was found to be unfit, the judge also found the child was suffering from irreparable harm as a direct result of the mother’s absent parenting and absence of moral fitness. So the judge made his judgment with the best interest of the child at stake. Hence how we got here. It’s never the “victim’s” fault right?

Oh and by the way, the child support was ordered years ago before custody was taken away. It was ordered because when Dad was originally paying it to her for several years it was proven that the child was not receiving the support. Instead the Dad went back to court and actually asked the court to make him 100% responsible for the support so he knew for a fact his daughter would not go without and make the mother reimburse the dad of her obligated portion within two months after receiving a receipt.

She was only ordered to pay the $117/month to cover her obligation of the medical/dental/vision insurance the Dad had on the child. The Mother’s obligation was less than 20% of the total monthly cost for healthcare benefits. When she refused to pay it after 18 months it was remanded to the state child support enforcement to garnish her wages.

However, but she had no issues using the same insurance to rack up $20k in fraudulent claims against the Dads insurance company for recent allegations she orchestrated against the Dad back in February 23 that were found to be false.

Oh and then there’s a 32 page google doc that was found on the school issued chromebook where the mother was coaching her daughter how to act when she accused the dad of rape. Like “when he hugs you step away and cringe”

---

quote:

---

So the boyfriend wanted to be the father and she let everyone believe he was the father,

---

quote:

---

did she ever marry the boyfriend? Did the boyfriend raise the girl as his until Barnes somehow entered the picture?

---