re: Tangipahoa Parish rape victim ordered to pay her abuser child support

quote:

---

It is clear you are connected to the rapist in some way. Nobody would try so hard to paint the victim as bad without some level of personal involvement. It was like you thought you were Russia and she was The Ukraine.

Exactly how are you involved? Use details, when explaining. TIA

---

I said multiple times that the guy should face charges. I know people who know the child through school. They don't think she is better off with either.

The cliff notes.

The mother was 16 yrs old when the father was in his thirties and sex occurred.

This should be open and shut case at this point. Yes, it seems like she is on the wrong side of the good ole boy network.

The mother now had the media on her side which is asking questions. This is now getting national attention.

Real question is how long before this opens up cracks in the good ole boy network where other stories pop up similar to this.

quote:

---

I said multiple times that the guy should face charges. I know people who know the child through school. They don't think she is better off with either.

---

Why do you continue to refuse to offer specifics? And half of what you said so far has been unequivocally disproven upon the release of further evidence. To which you circled back and scrubbed all those posts. And at no point have you explained or apologized for spreading misinformation. Said nothing on the recently released medical reports and claims from the daughter about ongoing sexual abuse from the father, or the pending domestic abuse allegations from another woman.

You are either one of those weird people on the internet that fake being close to a situation to give their opinion more legitimacy, or you have some sort of tie/bias to the accused beyond what you have stated so far, because ALL of your accusations have been toward the Mom’s direction, or people that weren’t willing to immediately start conjuring up slander about her to excuse the father. And about every one of those accusations has turned out to be bullshite.

Can you post a photo or link to the medical report and report of the abuse allegations from the other woman?

quote:

---

Can you post a photo or link to the medical report and report of the abuse allegations from the other woman?

---

It’s all in the thread…

quote:

---

That same month— court records note for the first time that the child was conceived from a rape. It’s also alleged that Barnes drugged and sexually assaulted his daughter on Feb. 21, 2022 and Feb. 22, 2022.

“She was transported to New Orleans where she was evaluated and the doctor confirmed that there was evidence of forced entry congruent with sexual assault,” the document reads. On March 18, 2022, Judge Cashe dismisses all of Abelseth’s claims saying all criminal charges have not been accepted and the evidence does not support the allegations made by the daughter.

Court records were not clear on what evidence led the judge to make his decision. An abuse advocate for Abelseth tells WBRZ the Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff's Office has not cooperated with the family over the location of the daughter's rape kit.

The sheriff's office, once again, did not respond to requests for comment Thursday.

Sheriff Daniel Edwards is the brother of La. Governor John Bel Edwards.

---

quote:

---

Additional documents filed show the daughter continues to maintain her dad abuses her.

---

LINK

A recent interview on the other page I posted also notes that the July 15 hearing will likely further detail some of the allegations, at the time Crysta and her advisor wanted to keep details private for the moment due to not having verified with their legal counsel what is safe to say and not publicly before that hearing, and because she does not want to say anything without consulting her daughter first, who it is also noted, is being cut off from her family by the father. Which follows a pattern of hyper controlling behavior on his part.

quote:

---

How in the frick do some of you continue to try and claim the woman in this story is either unfit, despite providing zero evidence, or on the level of the father, who again, has three outstanding allegations against him?

---

Where do you get this shite man? Where did I say the mother was unfit?

This teenage girl will be caught up in this constant drama now more than ever regardless of which parent she’s residing with, the media has taken over and this will be a long drawn out ordeal. Personally, I think the girl has been through enough and I’d simply want to spare her having this shitshow be the main focus in whichever household she has to reside.

You are entirely too emotionally sensitive about this. To the point where you jump to conclusions about every little comment a poster makes in this thread. Damn man put your chainmail and sword down, I’m not attacking the mother.

quote:

---

I know people who know the child through school. They don't think she is better off with either.

---

Can you quit fricking around like a Jr. high school girl, with all of the "I know Sumpin', but am only going to hint aboot what it might be."

You have had no problem trying to sway public opinion against this woman.

Say what's on your mind or STFU with you little hinting bullshite.

I’m pretty sure he means mom and stepdad are college educated.

Correct.

There was this huge groupthink in this thread that this mom just had to be this deadbeat, drug addled whore around town, trying to opportunistically get money and do in this good BAW that just happens to go home with a slut at the bar lying about her age….and it’s about the complete opposite of that

“Lost custody over a cell phone and then was forced to pay child support…” well, let’s look at that statement.

Because the father had provided a cell phone for the last five years prior to this with age appropriate parental controls without social media and it was monitored as a parent should. Both parents communicated freely with the child on that phone for years that the father paid for. Mom was providing ghost phones to this child that had multiple social media apps/profiles belonging to the minor child.

Furthermore, the mother went on to coerce and enable the child to hide it from Dad. In fact, mom actually punished her one weekend when the dad found one of the phones bc in mom’s words “you know it was never supposed to leave this house.” Dad found the phones. All three of them.

Wait! The mother provided a ghost phone to hide from dad, coaches the child to hide it, then punished her when Dad found it at his house? Yep. They would not give the codes to the dad even after being ordered by the judge to do so. So she was held in contempt. However, dad was eventually able to get into the phones and was able to see what the daughter was being allowed to do when she was in the custody of the mother every other week.

From the unsealed documents it was proven the daughter was being allowed to do the same things the mother was doing at the same age!!! Not only be allowed to do, but actually supported by the mother and the mother fostered that behavior with the 18 year old male the child was in a relationship with unknown to Dad that mother was hiding from the dad. The relationship that the mother was fostering and coercing/coaching both the 15 and 18 year old to hide because if Dad found out he would get the 18 year old in trouble. Adult things a 15 year old should not be doing!!

She was being allowed to live a party lifestyle, one some adults would be envious of, and run the show in her mother’s home. However, in Dad’s home there was structure, discipline, age appropriate responsibilities, accountability, and a standard of expectations appropriate to a 15 year old child. The child didn’t run the show nor was she living a partying lifestyle. The dad is not a Dad that chooses to raise his child through a cell and social media like so many other parents do. In short, Dad shut down the party lifestyle!

Now after court hearings the mother was found to be unfit, the judge also found the child was suffering from irreparable harm as a direct result of the mother’s absent parenting and absence of moral fitness. So the judge made his judgment with the best interest of the child at stake. Hence how we got here. It’s never the “victim’s” fault right?

Oh and by the way, the child support was ordered years ago before custody was taken away. It was ordered because when Dad was originally paying it to her for several years it was proven that the child was not receiving the support. Instead the Dad went back to court and actually asked the court to make him 100% responsible for the support so he knew for a fact his daughter would not go without and make the mother reimburse the dad of her obligated portion within two months after receiving a receipt.

She was only ordered to pay the $117/month to cover her obligation of the medical/dental/vision insurance the Dad had on the child. The Mother’s obligation was less than 20% of the total monthly cost for healthcare benefits. When she refused to pay it after 18 months it was remanded to the state child support enforcement to garnish her wages.

However, but she had no issues using the same insurance to rack up $20k in fraudulent claims against the Dads insurance company for recent allegations she orchestrated against the Dad back in February 23 that were found to be false.

Oh and then there’s a 32 page google doc that was found on the school issued chromebook where the mother was coaching her daughter how to act when she accused the dad of rape. Like “when he hugs you step away and cringe”.