- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tangipahoa Parish rape victim ordered to pay her abuser child support
Posted on 6/14/22 at 5:13 pm to Basura Blanco
Posted on 6/14/22 at 5:13 pm to Basura Blanco
quote:
And by doing that, you are deferring to a snippet of a TV interview. And yeah, I used my fingers (as opposed to toes?) to Google the statute he referenced. But unlike the edited TV interview you are willing to accept as Gospel, the statute I linked was from a .gov website. As in its the actual law he is partially referring too, only in its entirety.
You did get the amateur sleuth part right, so you got that going for you I guess.
Actual complete statute on Carnal Knowledge I google fingered from the actual legis.la.gov website
Actual complete civil statute the lawyer referenced (also fingered by googling)
And what exactly do you think this sleuthing is achieving?
Like this entire exercise seems like a wasted red herring, unless you are going to use that to build a bunch of assumptions off of to excuse the situation or John? Otherwise, it seems like a really wasteful exercise when the core of the matter here is an allegation of rape going un-investigated and matters of culpability, additional context, and custody unresolved because of it.
2
Posted on 6/14/22 at 5:47 pm to OldmanBeasley
It is statutory rape, but if I am reading the story correctly, he has never been found guilty of statutory rape.
It does not sound that he has even been charged yet.
It does not sound that he has even been charged yet.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 5:53 pm to Bronc
I’m curious as to your personal involvement in this matter.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 5:55 pm to Wiseguy
quote:\We don’t know because WE ONLY HEARD ONE SIDE OF THE STORY!!!
she lost custody because of good reasons What were those reasons?
Posted on 6/14/22 at 5:57 pm to nealnan8
Sapientia potentia est.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 6/14/22 at 6:56 pm to Bronc
quote:
And what exactly do you think this sleuthing is achieving?
Well, I quoted the actual statute in question in regards to whether he raped someone or not.
quote:
unless you are going to use that to build a bunch of assumptions off of to excuse the situation or John?
Settle down Beavis. I haven't excused shite. I have explicitly mentioned in every single one of my posts that the actions of the dude were creepy. As for assumptions, you are the one who has called the dude a rapist in every one of your posts. I cant help you if your assumptions and the legal definition of what occurred do not coincide. Not to mention you have assumed everyone here who doesn't agree with you lock stock and barrel must be a boomer rapist supporter.
quote:
when the core of the matter here is an allegation of rape going un-investigated and matters of culpability, additional context, and custody unresolved because of it
I have yet to see one post here say that the cops and DA are not either idiots or corrupt. And I agree that one of those assumptions is likely the case.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 7:01 pm to Basura Blanco
so semantics, gotcha, you are offended I am defaulting to calling the 30 year old that hangs out at underage bars and doesn’t bother to establish age before liquoring up underage girls and taking them home to frick them?
Here’s the thing, there is not a scenario where this is normal and acceptable behavior, despite the army of baws that want to try and find every angle they can to try and claim otherwise because this likely hits a bit too close to home
Probably missed them in between the pages full of posts of 40 year old baws making up preemptive excuses for a 30 year old fricking a 16 year old and your exercise in Google fu to make sure not to call what he did statutory rape. But in all actuality, there’s more posts in this thread of people bending over backwards to justify the judge and the police than I can find anyone questioning the process, conflicts of interest, or lack of police movement on investigating/charging the case. The default has been overwhelmingly to assume she’s a lying bitch or slut and has done something post hoc to retroactively erase the man’s culpability or potential guilt in this.
Here’s the thing, there is not a scenario where this is normal and acceptable behavior, despite the army of baws that want to try and find every angle they can to try and claim otherwise because this likely hits a bit too close to home
quote:
have yet to see one post here say that the cops and DA are not either idiots or corrupt. And I agree that one of those assumptions is likely the case.
Probably missed them in between the pages full of posts of 40 year old baws making up preemptive excuses for a 30 year old fricking a 16 year old and your exercise in Google fu to make sure not to call what he did statutory rape. But in all actuality, there’s more posts in this thread of people bending over backwards to justify the judge and the police than I can find anyone questioning the process, conflicts of interest, or lack of police movement on investigating/charging the case. The default has been overwhelmingly to assume she’s a lying bitch or slut and has done something post hoc to retroactively erase the man’s culpability or potential guilt in this.
This post was edited on 6/14/22 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 6/14/22 at 7:22 pm to Bronc
quote:
The rape happened at his house in Ponchatoula, its in the story
Not inside city limits
Posted on 6/14/22 at 7:30 pm to Ponchy Tiger
Where do you have this info?
And what does it really have to do with the fact the police have failed to follow up in 7 years on a rape allegation where there’s living proof the event in question at least happened?
If you are simply trying to white knight for the ponchatoula police, I’ll simply refer you to the Uvalde thread on the front page. Where state, local, and adjacent agencies have helped run interference since the tragedy. Or really, anyone that has lived in these areas and knows how goddamn much good ole boy connections change the application of laws and enforcement
And what does it really have to do with the fact the police have failed to follow up in 7 years on a rape allegation where there’s living proof the event in question at least happened?
If you are simply trying to white knight for the ponchatoula police, I’ll simply refer you to the Uvalde thread on the front page. Where state, local, and adjacent agencies have helped run interference since the tragedy. Or really, anyone that has lived in these areas and knows how goddamn much good ole boy connections change the application of laws and enforcement
Posted on 6/14/22 at 7:45 pm to Bronc
Not sure why nobody is saying anything about it being rape . Not carnal knowledge
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:04 pm to Penrod
She’s was good until she wasn’t getting child support and had to start paying child support.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:09 pm to SPEEDY
And now they either have to a)not report the rape or b)report the rape and risk having to bear the rapist's seed. Delightful.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:12 pm to Capt ST
quote:
She’s was good until she wasn’t getting child support and had to start paying child support.
You all keep saying this but she filed the charge in 2015, but full custody and payments werent awarded til this year. If she was paying during the 50/50 period then that means she was making more money, which pokes a hole in the other popular excuse for the creep, which is this is money driven(also interesting none of the baws question if this is the man trying to supplement his income, instead, it’s automatically him wanting to be a good father to the daughter of the woman he raped lol)
And so far, from the story and the random guy in this thread that seems to be friends with John, the bizzare reasoning for the switch in custody has to do with a phone event.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:53 pm to Bronc
quote:
Where do you have this info?
And what does it really have to do with the fact the police have failed to follow up in 7 years on a rape allegation where there’s living proof the event in question at least happened?
If you are simply trying to white knight for the ponchatoula police, I’ll simply refer you to the Uvalde thread on the front page. Where state, local, and adjacent agencies have helped run interference since the tragedy. Or really, anyone that has lived in these areas and knows how goddamn much good ole boy connections change the application of laws and enforcement
Because to my knowledge he lives outside the city limits. This falls on TPSO, not PPD that is all I am saying. Why 7 years? I have no clue.
I am not white knighting for anyone just stating facts without raw emotion like so many ppl in here. As far as your Uvalde comparison.....
are you bat shite fricking crazy? You are comparing a crime that happened 17 years ago and the law enforcement response or lack there of in a crime that no one knew existed for 5 years to a active shooter situation where its all hands on deck.This post was edited on 6/14/22 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 6/14/22 at 9:05 pm to Ponchy Tiger
quote:
Because to my knowledge he lives outside the city limits….Staring the fact
So where are you getting these facts about where John lived in 2005?
quote:
are you bat shite fricking crazy?
And are you retarded?
Do you think protect-the-blue or good-ole-boy policing is some new concept that never occurred until Uvalde?
A woman files a rape charge 7 years ago against a man that currently has a business contract with local police. A charge that at a minimum has credibility due to a child being born and the accused having proof positive DNA evidence. And despite that, no investigation has even been established, and the accused, with the police contract and business ties, has his record inexplicably sealed by ponchatoula police when media comes looking.
And Ponchy here just thinks, yep, nothing to raise questions about here, it’s just a jurisdictional issue that no one could figure out for 7 years.
Bet you also think that woman in Jarreau that “slipped on some chocolate syrup” and died with multiple fractured ribs/bones/lacerations and had some questionable connections to connected people in town doesn’t raise any questions either?
This post was edited on 6/14/22 at 9:16 pm
Posted on 6/14/22 at 11:05 pm to Bronc
Dude you are so horrible and unhinged you’ve actually done more damage to the victims case here in this discussion with your idiotic repeated false assumptions and unnecessary vitriol.
frick.
But please keep posting the same shite over and over and over and over again.
frick.
But please keep posting the same shite over and over and over and over again.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 11:15 pm to Havoc
If my comments have influence on you in that deeply stated way, then you were simply looking to make excuses and engage in apologetics to begin with.
This post was edited on 6/14/22 at 11:25 pm
Posted on 6/14/22 at 11:16 pm to SPEEDY
Posted on 6/14/22 at 11:22 pm to ItzMe1972
quote:
Breaking Internationally....
quote:
The ruling by Judge Jeffrey Cashe also forced Abelseth to pay child support to his alleged rapist, in what her advocates have branded an outrageous miscarriage of justice
Now there's a shocker. Ol Cashe actually made a decision on something? I would have guessed he's the most indecisive judge in the 21st JDC.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 11:29 pm to ItzMe1972
That dude def has connections if he has police as client with a dipshit "digital branding" company. Or not, ppl here love to brag about the ppl they "know"
The Dailymail once again doesn't disappoint showing the stupidest looking pic of the dude.
I'm on her side!
Blow it up Nakamoto!!!
The Dailymail once again doesn't disappoint showing the stupidest looking pic of the dude.
I'm on her side!
Blow it up Nakamoto!!!
Page 15 of 42
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News