re: Sugar industry is today's TOBACCO industry

quote:

---

% of daily allowance depends on each person and their individual metabolism.

---

This is correct but true for all nutrients and minerals. Why not treat them all the same? I think that is the point.

The government goes out of its way to treat sugar industry different. Checkout all the regulations created to protect the sugar industry. Regardless of whether you think sugar is good or bad it is reasonable to question why the government and the sugar industry are so cozy with each other.

not sure if anyone mentioned it or not but there is a global monopoly on sweeteners. Tate and Lyle own everything globally. As soon as competition comes along, they buy it. Yes, they own domino sugar too.

You're limited intellectually.

You know some things.

But you're incapable of processing them in a full-circle manner or apply a truth on top of a truth to arrive at higher truth.

Just go run PE class, dude.

quote:

---

Insulin is linked to cancer, in obese individuals. Key word is obese.

Obesity I'm general is linked to cancer.

---

Just stick with name calling.

You're too small macro'd or to locked into your little world.

You definitely should eat more sugar.

quote:

---

But it's okay to suck on assholes

---

Pretty sure a-hole is Keto-compliant, so yes.

quote:

---

Can you provide a link that says metabolism materially slows down because I can provide some that say matabolism in your 40s still functions ~95% as it does in your 20s

---

LINK

I did. It provides more than adequate explanation. You just replied that because somebody actually called you out on your usual from the hip bullshite responses where you think you're being brilliant.

quote:

---

I did.

---

Then you don't understand it. It essentially says if you control for outside factored metabolsim slows down by 24 calories. That's pretty much zero. It says almost exactly what I said, that weight gain is exponentially more because of NEAT than metabolism slow down.

quote:

---

RealityTiger

---

From the study that your article is based off of, list this as the conclusion. Again metabolism decreases due to a decrease in non physical activity

quote:

---

CONCLUSIONS:

The age-dependent decrease in TEE is mainly due to a decrease in physical activity. The stable energy intake and body weight of the GISELA subjects may be indicators for a relatively good health status

---

No I understand it.

I even posted the study that shows on a ketogenic diet that over a 6 month period keto dieters tend to lower energy consumption and unlike those following isocaloric diets, they did not decrease NEAT.

I agree with Junky on this exact thing 100%. Keto is a great tool to use if you like to eat. Offers some unique advantages, as does IF.

But keto does not cause you to burn bodyfat at a faster rate. Lowering caloric intake is what does. That is all I was saying.

And not everyone eats less on keto. I personally have to watch my caloric intake even closer on keto.

And keto isn't easy for many to follow. And that is reflected with it's 23% rate of people sticking to it, which is the same as....you guessed it, all other diets.

I love keto and carnivore, I just acknowledge it has no real metabolic advantage other than it does allow body fat loss from lower blood flow areas like the stomach easier than isocaloric. I also acknowledge it is a detriment to performance for almost everyone.

But yes, I try to deal is science. When helping people I try and keep it as simple as possible. If I tell people to track daily protein intake and weekly calories, it allows them to go with friends on Saturday and not feel guilty, to have a candy bar if they are on their period, to live a normal life and only worry about two things. It allows the. To correct and adjust for one bad night. It allows flexibility.