Started By
Message
locked post

Study shows that children who spend time with their fathers have higher IQs

Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:35 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:35 pm
LINK

quote:

Strong fatherly involvement in their early life can also improve a child's future career prospects, the research shows.

Academics at the University of Newcastle, who carried out the study, also found that men tended to pay more attention to their sons than their daughters.

The researchers warned that it was not enough for parents to live together, but that a father should be actively involved in a child's life to benefit their development.

The study looked at more than 11,000 British men and women, born in 1958.

The scientists asked their mothers how often the father of their child took part in activities with them, including reading, organising outings and general "quality time".

The findings, published in the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour, show that those children whose fathers spent more time with them had a higher IQ and were more socially mobile than those who had received little attention.

The differences were still detectable by the age of 42.

Dr Daniel Nettle, who led the research, said: "What was surprising about this research was the real sizeable difference in the progress of children who benefited from paternal interest and how thirty years later, people whose dads were involved are more upwardly mobile.

"The data suggest that having a second adult involved during childhood produces benefits in terms of skills and abilities that endure throughout adult life," he added.

Jon Davies, chief executive for Families Need Fathers, said: "We hope that research like this will lead to the government to reconsider how poorly served separated families often are and how a child needs a father as well as mother."


An absolutely shocking find.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 12:38 pm
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56773 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:36 pm to
So this explains why my mental capabilities are as absent as my father.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
159078 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:37 pm to
no

fricking

comment
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
141210 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:39 pm to
I don't think you need studies to know that children raised in a household with both parents present have greater chances of success and a well rounded life experience.
Posted by LeonPhelps
Member since May 2008
8185 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:39 pm to
It seems to me that the cause and effect here is unclear. I think intelligent dad's are more likely to spend time with their children and will have passed on those higher IQ genes to their kids. Dumb parents, particularly lower class dad's, are less likely to spend time with their kids.
Posted by Spankum
The Sip
Member since Jan 2007
63307 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:39 pm to
so, the question is...does spending time with your father raise your IQ or do kids with higher IQ prefer to spend time with father?....
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58845 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:42 pm to
Gay and feminist lobby going to get mad.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86492 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:43 pm to
Having parents that are both educated/ college graduates and that regularly engage the children intellectually is one of the greatest indicators of future success in America. It's not an inherent IQ thing, it's an exposure to The Socratic method, problem solving, decision-making and intellectual inquiry. Parents who understand stuff, tend to pass that stuff on. Parents that are struggling to survive tend to be more stressed and controlling in their parenting style. It would make sense that kids that have a smart Pops would be smarter. Smarter people place a higher premium on intelligence, and on preparing their children for success.
Posted by Jet12
Tweet, tweet, tweet, two steps.
Member since Nov 2010
20554 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Gay and feminist lobby going to get mad.

If it's 2 dads, wouldn't the kids be twice as smart then, following this logic?

Maybe the lesbian couples would have an issue.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 1:25 pm
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
110709 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:25 pm to
Racist study is racist.
Posted by LSUwag
Florida man
Member since Jan 2007
18145 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:39 pm to
So, they had to do a study to prove the obvious.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

It seems to me that the cause and effect here is unclear. I think intelligent dad's are more likely to spend time with their children and will have passed on those higher IQ genes to their kids. Dumb parents, particularly lower class dad's, are less likely to spend time with their kid


Sure seems like the study would have controlled for that.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
28268 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:04 pm to
i never had the "let's go fishing, son" type of relationship with my dad, mainly because he worked his arse off during the week, wasn't home a lot during the week, and rested on the weekends (when possible), however i turned out OK.... i'll just say my IQ is somewhere north of 130...

we have a great relationship now, but i am trying to do better by my kids... i will, god willing, do the most i can with and for them...
Posted by BigB0882
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
5422 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:06 pm to
Correlation does not equal causation but it doesn't take a genius to put together that a child that has a father in their life probably has other advantages over their peers who have no father present.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
110709 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

i'll just say my IQ is somewhere north of 130...


Okay, sure. Determined by what measure?
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
28268 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Determined by what measure?

umm.... the IQ test i took quite a few years ago....

if i weren't so fricking lazy during my off days, i'd probably apply to Mensa... but yeah, i'm good
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

i never had the "let's go fishing, son" type of relationship with my dad, mainly because he worked his arse off during the week, wasn't home a lot during the week, and rested on the weekends (when possible), however i turned out OK.... i'll just say my IQ is somewhere north of 130...

we have a great relationship now, but i am trying to do better by my kids... i will, god willing, do the most i can with and for them...


Well, what if your kids are even smarter than you? Wouldn't that prove the test?
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
28268 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Well, what if your kids are even smarter than you? Wouldn't that prove the test?

let's hope so.... i mean, they may be only 50% Asian, but they are 100% pharmacists, genetically speaking, of course...
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
110709 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:37 pm to
IQ tests vary quite a bit, some are more comprehensive than others and some are just bullshite. I hope you're basing your claims on one of the former and not the latter. At least you're not claiming a 188 IQ like otto did.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
28268 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:43 pm to
SB-V....

the least impressive of the "130 as an indicator" tests...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram