- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Study shows that children who spend time with their fathers have higher IQs
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:35 pm
LINK
An absolutely shocking find.
quote:
Strong fatherly involvement in their early life can also improve a child's future career prospects, the research shows.
Academics at the University of Newcastle, who carried out the study, also found that men tended to pay more attention to their sons than their daughters.
The researchers warned that it was not enough for parents to live together, but that a father should be actively involved in a child's life to benefit their development.
The study looked at more than 11,000 British men and women, born in 1958.
The scientists asked their mothers how often the father of their child took part in activities with them, including reading, organising outings and general "quality time".
The findings, published in the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour, show that those children whose fathers spent more time with them had a higher IQ and were more socially mobile than those who had received little attention.
The differences were still detectable by the age of 42.
Dr Daniel Nettle, who led the research, said: "What was surprising about this research was the real sizeable difference in the progress of children who benefited from paternal interest and how thirty years later, people whose dads were involved are more upwardly mobile.
"The data suggest that having a second adult involved during childhood produces benefits in terms of skills and abilities that endure throughout adult life," he added.
Jon Davies, chief executive for Families Need Fathers, said: "We hope that research like this will lead to the government to reconsider how poorly served separated families often are and how a child needs a father as well as mother."
An absolutely shocking find.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:36 pm to OMLandshark
So this explains why my mental capabilities are as absent as my father.
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:39 pm to OMLandshark
I don't think you need studies to know that children raised in a household with both parents present have greater chances of success and a well rounded life experience.
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:39 pm to OMLandshark
It seems to me that the cause and effect here is unclear. I think intelligent dad's are more likely to spend time with their children and will have passed on those higher IQ genes to their kids. Dumb parents, particularly lower class dad's, are less likely to spend time with their kids.
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:39 pm to OMLandshark
so, the question is...does spending time with your father raise your IQ or do kids with higher IQ prefer to spend time with father?....
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:42 pm to OMLandshark
Gay and feminist lobby going to get mad.
Posted on 1/10/16 at 12:43 pm to OMLandshark
Having parents that are both educated/ college graduates and that regularly engage the children intellectually is one of the greatest indicators of future success in America. It's not an inherent IQ thing, it's an exposure to The Socratic method, problem solving, decision-making and intellectual inquiry. Parents who understand stuff, tend to pass that stuff on. Parents that are struggling to survive tend to be more stressed and controlling in their parenting style. It would make sense that kids that have a smart Pops would be smarter. Smarter people place a higher premium on intelligence, and on preparing their children for success.
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:24 pm to prplhze2000
quote:
Gay and feminist lobby going to get mad.
If it's 2 dads, wouldn't the kids be twice as smart then, following this logic?
Maybe the lesbian couples would have an issue.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:25 pm to OMLandshark
Racist study is racist. 
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:39 pm to OMLandshark
So, they had to do a study to prove the obvious.
Posted on 1/10/16 at 1:43 pm to LeonPhelps
quote:
It seems to me that the cause and effect here is unclear. I think intelligent dad's are more likely to spend time with their children and will have passed on those higher IQ genes to their kids. Dumb parents, particularly lower class dad's, are less likely to spend time with their kid
Sure seems like the study would have controlled for that.
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:04 pm to OMLandshark
i never had the "let's go fishing, son" type of relationship with my dad, mainly because he worked his arse off during the week, wasn't home a lot during the week, and rested on the weekends (when possible), however i turned out OK.... i'll just say my IQ is somewhere north of 130...
we have a great relationship now, but i am trying to do better by my kids... i will, god willing, do the most i can with and for them...
we have a great relationship now, but i am trying to do better by my kids... i will, god willing, do the most i can with and for them...
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:06 pm to chRxis
Correlation does not equal causation but it doesn't take a genius to put together that a child that has a father in their life probably has other advantages over their peers who have no father present.
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:18 pm to chRxis
quote:
i'll just say my IQ is somewhere north of 130...
Okay, sure. Determined by what measure?
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:22 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
Determined by what measure?
umm.... the IQ test i took quite a few years ago....
if i weren't so fricking lazy during my off days, i'd probably apply to Mensa... but yeah, i'm good
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:23 pm to chRxis
quote:
i never had the "let's go fishing, son" type of relationship with my dad, mainly because he worked his arse off during the week, wasn't home a lot during the week, and rested on the weekends (when possible), however i turned out OK.... i'll just say my IQ is somewhere north of 130...
we have a great relationship now, but i am trying to do better by my kids... i will, god willing, do the most i can with and for them...
Well, what if your kids are even smarter than you? Wouldn't that prove the test?
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:27 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Well, what if your kids are even smarter than you? Wouldn't that prove the test?
let's hope so.... i mean, they may be only 50% Asian, but they are 100% pharmacists, genetically speaking, of course...
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:37 pm to chRxis
IQ tests vary quite a bit, some are more comprehensive than others and some are just bullshite. I hope you're basing your claims on one of the former and not the latter. At least you're not claiming a 188 IQ like otto did.
Posted on 1/10/16 at 2:43 pm to PsychTiger
SB-V....
the least impressive of the "130 as an indicator" tests...
the least impressive of the "130 as an indicator" tests...
Popular
Back to top

19










