- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Study - Electric Cars Produce More Pollution Than Fossil Fuel-Burning Cars
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:05 am
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:05 am
quote:
The study, conducted by Victor Timmers and Peter Achten at the University of Edinburgh, and published by the journal Atmospheric Environment, found that heavier electric vehicles produce as many pollutants as their lighter weight conventional vehicles.
quote:
Electric vehicles tend to produce more pollutants from tire and brake wear, due in large part to their batteries, as well as the other parts needed to propel them, making them heavier. These pollutants are emitted when electric vehicle tires and brakes deteriorate as they accelerate or slow down while driving. Timmers and Achten’s research suggests exhaust from traditional vehicles is only about one-third of the total emissions. Read more: LINK
https://dailycaller.com/2016/05/15/electric-vehicles-emit-more-pollutants-than-fossil-fuel-burning-cars-says-study/
Link to the actual report if you wish to pay the $35 per copy Non-exhaust Particulate Matter Emissions from Electric Vehicles
quote:
Further, the particulate matters are worse than fuel emissions, because they cause more health problems. “We found that non-exhaust emissions, from brakes, tires and the road, are far larger than exhaust emissions in all modern cars,” Achten wrote in the study. He continued: “These are more toxic than emissions from modern engines so they are likely to be key factors in the extra heart attacks, strokes and asthma attacks seen when air pollution levels surge.”
quote:
The increase in pollutants are generated from factors like tire wear dust and brake pad dust, and tend to increase as the electric vehicles and hybrids get heavier — due in part because of the added weight of the cars’ lithium batteries.
quote:
Chemicals and gasses from tires, brakes and whatnot also pollute, often with nasty stuff. Because of those heavy batteries (and the pollution it takes to make them) electric cars are simply not much better than traditional gasoline ones.
This post was edited on 5/19/16 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:11 am to Shexter
This article isn't saying that electric cars produce more pollution, it's saying that they produce the same amount of pollution. There's more pollutants from tire and brake wear, but less from other sources. The net pollution is equal to non-electric cars.
It's still noteworthy, though.
We're still in the infancy of electric cars, and I would bet that innovations will eventually allow for lighter electric vehicles, and therefore electric vehicles with lower emissions.
We shall see.
It's still noteworthy, though.
We're still in the infancy of electric cars, and I would bet that innovations will eventually allow for lighter electric vehicles, and therefore electric vehicles with lower emissions.
We shall see.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:13 am to Shexter
I want a $30K electric car because it is cheaper per mile to operate than gas powered vehicles.
The environment is of secondary concern.
The environment is of secondary concern.
This post was edited on 5/19/16 at 11:14 am
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:14 am to Hog on the Hill
nickel mine to produce batteries
oilrig.
which one looks to be harming the environment.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:18 am to Hog on the Hill
quote:
The net pollution is equal to non-electric cars.
Factor in the higher number of pollutants for production and it is a huge negative.
When the pollutants for mass production were discovered they were said to be outweighed by the reduced amount during operation. Here we see that this is simply not true. Factor in that the pollutants being produced more by electric cars are in fact more harmful and electric cars should take a YUUUGE hit.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:25 am to AwesomeSauce
its better for the environment to drive a big 4x4 than an electric car.
it is economical though compared with internal combustion
it is economical though compared with internal combustion
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:28 am to Shexter
LinkedIn will tell you that Victor Timmers is doing a BEng at Edinburgh graduating in 2017.
He did an internship at this consultancy company in what would have been his second year when this paper was produced.
Hmmm...
He did an internship at this consultancy company in what would have been his second year when this paper was produced.
Hmmm...
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:33 am to Shexter
How much money did the US government waste to pump the electric vehicle over the last 8 years? That $$$ would have done alot more to reduce carbon emissions if we had spent it on traffic congestion relief or as tax credits for trading in a traditional auto on one that gets better mpg, or just about anything else.
Posted on 5/19/16 at 11:53 am to Shexter
Did they factor in the pollution needed to charge the battery? Because it's very inefficient. Considering the efficiency of most power plants is 31-34% (coal, oil, nuclear), with the best fossil fuel (natural gas) at about 43%, then add in the losses in transmission, etc., the efficiency approaches the average of most internal combustion engines (20%). Yes, the efficiency of the battery is 85-90%, but it still has to be charged.
from just this perspective, I don't see how electric cars are less of a pollutant. Then you add in the caustic nature of the production and disposal of the battery. Now, if you're charging from solar or hydroelectric, it's obviously better
from just this perspective, I don't see how electric cars are less of a pollutant. Then you add in the caustic nature of the production and disposal of the battery. Now, if you're charging from solar or hydroelectric, it's obviously better
Posted on 5/19/16 at 12:07 pm to Chad504boy
Those Got Damn batteries are just as "pollutin"


Posted on 5/19/16 at 12:08 pm to Chad504boy
that's one occurance
each mine produces acid rain throughout its life. over and over again
each mine produces acid rain throughout its life. over and over again
Posted on 5/19/16 at 12:15 pm to Hog on the Hill
Did they factor in disposing of the spent batteries?
Posted on 5/19/16 at 12:15 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
it is economical though compared with internal combustion
Absent any incentives/subsidies, is it?
Posted on 5/19/16 at 12:18 pm to Shexter
Link to study or article?
Nm. Found your link.
What qualifies as a "heavy weight electric vehicle" and what did they use a "light weight conventional vehicle"?
Nm. Found your link.
What qualifies as a "heavy weight electric vehicle" and what did they use a "light weight conventional vehicle"?
This post was edited on 5/19/16 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 5/19/16 at 12:20 pm to ruzil
you guys are assuming the world will continue using old battery technology.
New generation batteries don't even use nickel anymore.
Graphene, Lithium ion, and sodium ion batteries are on our doorstep. Their disposal and production will be much cleaner that current battery tech.
Article on next gen batteries
New generation batteries don't even use nickel anymore.
Graphene, Lithium ion, and sodium ion batteries are on our doorstep. Their disposal and production will be much cleaner that current battery tech.
Article on next gen batteries
Posted on 5/19/16 at 12:23 pm to Tigeralum2008
an electric car weighs 4600-4900 lbs.
A Ford F-150 weighs 4-5000lbs
A Toyota Camry weighs 3400lbs
How many of my fellow truck driving baws feel bad because they are using up their brakes and tires more than if they had purchased a sedan? I for one do not
A Ford F-150 weighs 4-5000lbs
A Toyota Camry weighs 3400lbs
How many of my fellow truck driving baws feel bad because they are using up their brakes and tires more than if they had purchased a sedan? I for one do not
This post was edited on 5/19/16 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 5/19/16 at 12:25 pm to Shexter
Here's the abstract summary from the study.
quote:
A positive relationship exists between vehicle weight and non-exhaust emissions.
Electric vehicles are 24% heavier than their conventional counterparts.
Electric vehicle PM emissions are comparable to those of conventional vehicles.
Non-exhaust sources account for 90% of PM10 and 85% of PM2.5 from traffic.
Future policy should focus on reducing vehicle weight.
Popular
Back to top

16











