re: Student expelled after confronting teen over deepfake porn image; family plans lawsuit

Holy shite. That attorney at 50 minutes in just fricks down the School Board.

They should be embarrassed as hell.

quote:

---

Exactly. If someone creates porn where the participants appear to be underage, but they are actually not, or they are just artificial creations that have no real age, can it be classified as CP? Great legal question to debate.

---

Court precedent says no, there has to be an actual child harmed for it to be a crime.

But in this case there should be an exception as an actual child was harmed. It wasn't a computer generated child who never existed but an actual child whose image was inserted.

A lot of people at the school need to be fired asap and the majority of that school board recalled. There is no defending their actions.

Kid creating it should be kicked out of public school and forced into military school. Parents should never allow a ped in his hands ever again.

I have zero tolerance for anyone abusing kids sexually just like the school had zero tolerance for the “fight”. Dad needs to teach daughter how to throw a proper punch. She should at minimum broken that kids nose.

quote:

---

Attorney Miller said school leaders at Sixth Ward Middle School failed to address the girl’s complaints about the circulating image, despite her reporting it to school leaders. “The school board’s actions in this case are reprehensible,” Miller said. “My client’s daughter was begging them all day to put a stop to this. Not only did they not put a stop to it, they put [her] on the bus with the perpetrator.”

---

The school admin paid no attention to possible child porn being circulated through the school?? If what they said is true, not only should there be a house cleaning of all staff, they should scrub it with bleach.

I hope the girl gets every dime they are after.

Update from LPSO and Lafourche Parish School District:

Lafourche Parish Sheriff Craig Webre and Lafourche Parish School Superintendent Jarod Martin are providing more information on an incident at Sixth Ward Middle School in an attempt to correct rumors and misinformation.

On August 26, 2025, female students reported concerns to a school counselor about the possible existence of artificially made nude images of students, which were rumored to have been shared among students. Sixth Ward Middle School administrators and the LPSO school resource officer began an immediate investigation.

Consistent with established policy, several students were interviewed, and parents were contacted during the course of the day regarding the allegations. Despite everyone’s best efforts, by the end of the school day, investigators had not been successful in locating any image or any evidence of the existence of the images. Given that there was no indication of the potential for physical violence, it was correctly decided that the investigation would resume the following morning. Similarly, based on the information that had been obtained up to that point, officials had no reason to consider delaying normal dismissal.

After dismissal, an altercation occurred on a school bus involving four students, including a female student and one of the male students who had reportedly been sharing the images. A student-recorded video of the incident, which depicted three students (two male, one female) striking the male student multiple times, was posted on Facebook. The overwhelming social media sentiment was one of outrage and a demand that the students involved in the fight be held accountable. In response to the video, LPSO school resource officers and juvenile detectives worked to obtain statements and obtained search warrants for phones and social media accounts. It was during this aspect of the investigation that juvenile detectives and school resource officers discovered A.I. generated nude images of eight female middle school students and two adults.

The focus of the criminal investigation then pivoted to the creation and dissemination of the pornographic images. As previously reported, thus far, one male juvenile has been criminally charged. The investigation is continuing, and additional charges against a second individual are possible.

While both agencies are investigating the same incidents, it should be noted that each has its own unique scope of authority and is held to a different legal standard. The Lafourche Parish Sheriff’s Office investigations are directed to determining whether violations of the law are criminal in nature. The Lafourche Parish School District is investigating these incidents as violations of school rules and policies which, if violated, are subject to administrative sanctions.

In investigations involving school incidents, criminal charges can, but do not necessarily, play a factor in disciplinary actions. Regardless, both public agencies are committed to protecting the privacy and legal rights of the children involved.

- ### -
For additional transparency on this case, here is the initial report from the incident in August:

LPSO Report

Couldn’t the boy get arrested for creating and disseminating child porn since she is underage?

The student did not provide any evidence of the images. She said she didn't have the images, didn't know who made them and didn't know who had them.

Not sure how thata possible. But it's the story on why no initial police involvement

quote:

---

You cant make a gun that cant murder someone but can be used as self defense or other legal uses.

---

With AI, it’s possible.

quote:

---

The student did not provide any evidence of the images. She said she didn't have the images, didn't know who made them and didn't know who had them.

---

Where does it say that?

quote:

---

The overwhelming social media sentiment was one of outrage and a demand that the students involved in the fight be held accountable.

---

Wow. A joint statement from LPSO and the school district about a child pornography investigation and they are inserting a line about Facebook reactions?

Like.. what does that have to do with your investigation?