- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: State pauses work on Louisiana's biggest-ever coastal project. 'You just can't afford it.'
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:03 am to ragincajun03
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:03 am to ragincajun03
Won't have sate to govern if you keep letting it erode away, but I get it you gotta have some money to line the pockets of your cronies.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:07 am to Tarps99
quote:
What is to say we get this 3 billion dollar project built, and someone sues on behalf of the impact to the porpoise population in the basin and a judge drastically reduces the that water comes out of it and handicaps any land growth or change to the coast.
That would be a waste of time as there are no porpoises in LA state waters nor in the entirety of the Gulf.
Now, if we are discussing dolphins, there was an act of congress to bypass the Marine Mammal Protection Act for this project. I’m not sure how that would affect potential lawsuits, but it is definitely a thing here.
Bottlenose Dolphins are not and have never been endangered…they get far too much protection under the MMPA; fish-stealing, raping bastards. Haha.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:54 am to Tarps99
quote:
Someone hasn’t been to Grand Isle.
Someone doesnt know how barrier island evolution and longshore transport works.

The real reason the rocks appear to work on Grand Isle is because they are slowing down the longshore drift from the west, not magically holding what is there in huge overwash storm events. Barrier shorelines appear stable only because they are in equilibrium of sand moving in and out of any given reach along the short from up-current to down-current, NOT because that sand is staying put. More sand in than out makes the beach grow. Less sand in and out makes the beach erode.

Fourchon and Elmers are eroding, providing a huge sand engine feeing and sustaining Grand Isle as shown above. Putting rocks on the east end of GI will starve the west end and put it in a sediment "shadow." Beaches on the west end will erode. The island in Terrebonne you refer to, Racoon, is the textbook case for this. It gets its sand from the east. The breakwaters helped the eastern end of the island but starved the western end to the point it disappeared.
Every other application of rocks along the deltaic plain shorelines of LA (Wine Island, Timbalier Island) have flopped miserably. Wine Island was ringed with rocks...if rocks work so well to hold sand, how did the entire island migrate out of the rocks as shown below? We would be best off using larger sand grain sizes from the Mississippi and Ship Shoal on all the barriers versus the ebb tidal delta crap they're pulling up from Caminada Pass and putting back on the beach. It will be gone soon.

I'll leave the numerous fallacies in your understanding of how diversions work to be addressed by others.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 9:22 am to cssamerican
quote:
I’m so glad my fellow citizens keep voting to dedicate tax money to coastal restoration
This particular project is paid for by BP Oil Spill funds. Zero tax dollars are being spent as it sits. Now - the year long delays have increased the price tag as contractors are sitting on site doing nothing and sending weekly invoices. What can possibly cost the taxpayers funds is canceling the project and having to pay back the 500+ million that has already been issued to start the project. The trust that controls the funds have already said that they want that money back if the project is shitcanned.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 10:05 am to Mr Breeze
The idea that Mississippi River diversions are ineffective is at odds with new land created by two relatively recent natural diversions on the East Bank, Mardi Gras Pass and especially Neptune Pass.
What's the Difference Between Neptune Pass and Mardi Gras Pass
Neptune Pass Viewed to the East
Viewed to the West
The idea that dredging is a superior solution doesn't account for natural subsidence in Barataria Bay, bolstered by geological studies on the presence of shallow subsurface faults in the area. Dredging is a perpetual, ongoing never ending approach with legitimate questions on its long term feasibility in both cost and effectiveness.
Moreover, the common sense observation that unconsolidated sediments will not support tons of rock piles associated with dredging for decades in the future, with near certain chances for submergence below the water line, is obvious.
Ask Ryan Lambert, owner of Cajun Fishing Adventures in Buras with 40 years experience guiding there, about Neptune Pass. He is an unabashed enthusiast seeing the positive effects first hand, over a relatively short period of time.
Does any of this make a difference in the project's execution going forward?
Not one fricking bit.
Landry and Nungesser have already made the decision for you.
What's the Difference Between Neptune Pass and Mardi Gras Pass
quote:
The natural river diversion at Neptune Pass is much earlier in its deltaic life cycle than Mardi Gras Pass, but it is quickly spreading sediment across Quarantine Bay and Bay Denesse, where existing terracing projects are trapping the sediment and building new land. This outfall area is quickly becoming a thriving haven for wildlife including ducks, alligators, redfish and more.
Neptune Pass Viewed to the East

Viewed to the West

The idea that dredging is a superior solution doesn't account for natural subsidence in Barataria Bay, bolstered by geological studies on the presence of shallow subsurface faults in the area. Dredging is a perpetual, ongoing never ending approach with legitimate questions on its long term feasibility in both cost and effectiveness.
Moreover, the common sense observation that unconsolidated sediments will not support tons of rock piles associated with dredging for decades in the future, with near certain chances for submergence below the water line, is obvious.
Ask Ryan Lambert, owner of Cajun Fishing Adventures in Buras with 40 years experience guiding there, about Neptune Pass. He is an unabashed enthusiast seeing the positive effects first hand, over a relatively short period of time.
Does any of this make a difference in the project's execution going forward?
Not one fricking bit.
Landry and Nungesser have already made the decision for you.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 10:25 am to SpqrTiger
quote:
These projects were never intended to reach completion in our lifetimes..
Its purposefull
Like SS ending
Global warming
WWIII if we dont support Ukraine
All these things that will happen after we are dead, if we dont throw money at it right this instance
Then another Cat 5 comes along, and fricks that 50 year plan up. And the coastline suddenly needs even more money
Posted on 4/7/25 at 10:28 am to choupiquesushi
apparently the state will bear the brunt of costs down the line
who knows with LA politicians
who knows with LA politicians
Posted on 4/7/25 at 10:43 am to Boston911
quote:
disagree that creating 25sq/mi land in one small area and in 50 years when we will lose 1500-3000 square miles in 50 years is worth the time, $ and effort
Net gain
Posted on 4/7/25 at 10:46 am to Lickitty Split
quote:
If it’s not the state’s money then why the hell is the state paying for it or will be made to pay for it if it’s canceled?
I give you $100 with strings attached.
You spend $20 then tell me you atrbtbgiing to do what you agreed to do.
Yes,you owe me all $100 back
Posted on 4/7/25 at 3:05 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
If it’s not the state’s money then why the hell is the state paying for it or will be made to pay for it if it’s canceled?
I give you $100 with strings attached.
You spend $20 then tell me you atrbtbgiing to do what you agreed to do.
Yes,you owe me all $100 back
Pretty much this - the entities that control the BP funds approved this project to be constructed in Louisiana. They originally earmarked it at about a billion and a half dollars. Once negotiations with contractors and subcontractors and material suppliers got hashed out, the new price tag came in at just under 3 billion dollars. JBE and the CPRA heads and whoever else in Louisiana then went to the entities that control the money and said - hey this is gonna cost a lot more and we don't want Louisiana taxpayers to pay for the overage, so we need to do something else. They responded that they can cover the entire cost if we commit to doing the project, which the JBE admin said ok to. Approximately 500 billion dollars was released by the controllers of the money to various contractors for sitework, mobilization, equipment, and whatever else. Those contractors were supposed to start over a year ago and they have been sitting there doing nothing. Sending invoices weekly to CPRA and losing money that they could be making on other jobs. Now the state of Louisiana will find itself in breach of contract with the controllers of the BP money for cancelling the job. And - rightfully so - they want their money back. So - who is gonna pay that?
Posted on 4/7/25 at 3:05 pm to ragincajun03
I had a friend tell this to a person one time when we were on a vacation.
To be fair the person was becoming quite annoying.
To be fair the person was becoming quite annoying.
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 4/7/25 at 3:07 pm to ragincajun03
I bet if Jeff Landrys family was doing the construction we wouldnt be looking at a pause.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 3:12 pm to jizzle6609
Correct - but the state is likely now looking at multiple lawsuits in addition to the BP fund demanding their money back. Lots of contractors sitting over there for a year plus losing out on revenue from other jobs. Lots of material suppliers paying a year plus of material storage fees for nothing. And - good luck with ever getting another dime of that money on any project here in the state. There are 4 other eligible gulf coast states that the BP trust can work with and grant that money to.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 3:13 pm to lsuchip30
quote:
Correct - but the state is likely now looking at multiple lawsuits in addition to the BP fund demanding their money back. Lots of contractors sitting over there for a year plus losing out on revenue from other jobs. Lots of material suppliers paying a year plus of material storage fees for nothing. And - good luck with ever getting another dime of that money on any project here in the state. There are 4 other eligible gulf coast states that the BP trust can work with and grant that money to.
I really dont care, the state votes in retards every chance they get and let the older families in the areas bend them over at will.
Maybe one day.
Posted on 4/8/25 at 9:35 am to Mr Breeze
Neptune Pass should be understood by everyone in this thread. Here is a great page describing what happened. In 2019 the pass opened up and in only 3 or 4 years a large delta already began forming in the previously open water receiving basin of Quarantine Bay. You can see the mouth bars forming into islands as the sediment from the river is blasted out but slows down and deposits, building the islands. It will look like the wax lake or Atchafalaya delta in a few more years, not decades. And these are huge deltas that continue to grow.
Anyone can look at google maps and see how the Barataria basin is opening up from grand isle to Lafitte and the doorstep of NOLA. From a pure hurricane protection point of view, this is very bad. Currently there is a wide open highway for water to travel from the gulf to the West Bank, where in the past the water was choked down by smaller bayous and much more land and marsh.
Allowing sediment to deposit in the barataria basin, just like Neptune Pass, will quickly form mud and sand flats throughout the basin, then marsh, then tight bayous just like used to exist 100 years ago.
Neptune Pass
Anyone can look at google maps and see how the Barataria basin is opening up from grand isle to Lafitte and the doorstep of NOLA. From a pure hurricane protection point of view, this is very bad. Currently there is a wide open highway for water to travel from the gulf to the West Bank, where in the past the water was choked down by smaller bayous and much more land and marsh.
Allowing sediment to deposit in the barataria basin, just like Neptune Pass, will quickly form mud and sand flats throughout the basin, then marsh, then tight bayous just like used to exist 100 years ago.
Neptune Pass
Posted on 4/8/25 at 10:09 am to WizardSleeve
Neptune pass and Mardi Gras pass both have naturally created land mass on the east side. This west side resoration project has been studied for more than a decade and this is what the experts came up with. I realize that there are arguments on both sides and for different methods. I believe that it is quite apparant that a west side diversion will work and do what it is intended to do. I just tend to focus more on the economic impact of a 3 billion dollar construction project that Louisiana taxpayers don't have to pay for.
Posted on 4/8/25 at 10:16 am to Mr Breeze
Thank you for that info. The OT seems to continue to come through with unique insight into various topics.
From the same website you linked, found this interesting about Neptune Pass:
LINK /
Truly amazing.
From the same website you linked, found this interesting about Neptune Pass:
quote:
In six years, Neptune Pass went from being a small canal on the bank of the Mississippi to a channel with a flow rate five times larger than the Hudson River.
Neptune Pass diverts roughly 16% of the Mississippi River’s total flow.
Mardi Gras Pass, the focus of our last stop diverts 25,000 cubic feet of water per second. Neptune is currently over 118,600 cfps.
Taken by volume alone, Neptune Pass would be one of the 15 largest rivers in the world by volume.
LINK /
Truly amazing.
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:30 am to DMAN1968
quote:Its this Land and lease owners... If the farmers get pay outs, they wont be paying the leases to fish. Nunguesser cough cough. ...
the project included almost $400 million dollars to assist the oyster and shrimp guys in the basin that would be impacted.
Yeah...they would have received generational wealth...but they said nah, who wants that.
Idiots.
Back to top
