- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spinoff: the American Civil War never happened. How long until slavery ended?
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:36 pm to fr33manator
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:36 pm to fr33manator
1870. It was already on it's way out. The importation of slaves had stopped back in the 1830s.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:39 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
There are no laurels for the slave economy to latch onto or rest upon. It's just a shameful legacy.
I'm not suggesting any laurels. (The only one I know rolled with Hardy)
But I'd argue that a natural progression to a voluntary end of slavery would have been much less costly as far as human cost and race relations. Hell, society as a whole would have ended up better.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:40 pm to Redbone
quote:
1870. It was already on it's way out.
No. No.
quote:
The importation of slaves had stopped back in the 1830s.
Legally it stopped in 1808-09.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:44 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Face it, brother. There are no laurels for the slave economy to latch onto or rest upon. It's just a shameful legacy.
What the hell?
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:58 pm to Navytiger74
But I'd argue that a natural progression to a voluntary end of slavery would have been much less costly as far as human cost and race relations. Hell, society as a whole would have ended up better. [/img]
As an institution, it is so morally bankrupt, the [i]ownership of another human being, that to continue for any more time at all would not have been tenable. Would a voluntary end in say 1880 have made any difference in how each race viewed the other? Ending slavery was as good a reason as any in our history that American blood has been spilled over.
As an institution, it is so morally bankrupt, the [i]ownership of another human being, that to continue for any more time at all would not have been tenable. Would a voluntary end in say 1880 have made any difference in how each race viewed the other? Ending slavery was as good a reason as any in our history that American blood has been spilled over.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 10:44 pm to fr33manator
If you believe in infinite universes, the Civil War in fact didn't happen. Also the South also won. Also they won by fighting with giant pink dildos. That's modern physics.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 10:48 pm to BigPapiDoesItAgain
quote:
Would a voluntary end in say 1880 have made any difference in how each race viewed the other?
Yes. Very much so. The blood of hundreds of thousands of dead and decades of systematic oppression and the retaliation to said oppression tends to leave more bad blood than a peaceful resolution to change.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 11:07 pm to The Baker
quote:
There was a lot of language that protected slavery (obviously) but they banned international slave trading.
The cynic in me says they probably did that to help keep the value of the slaves that were already here higher.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 11:15 pm to fr33manator
quote:a decade or so in dwindling form.
he American Civil War never happened. How long until slavery ended?
Posted on 10/26/15 at 11:29 pm to fr33manator
20 years at the maximum. 5-7 years at the minimum.
Industrialization and new inventions was well on its way to making slavery obsolete like every other country in the world and they did it peacefully.
But no, we had to kill Six hundred thousand americans to end it.
Industrialization and new inventions was well on its way to making slavery obsolete like every other country in the world and they did it peacefully.
But no, we had to kill Six hundred thousand americans to end it.
This post was edited on 10/26/15 at 11:30 pm
Posted on 10/26/15 at 11:57 pm to fr33manator
Mississippi still has slavery according to Ole Miss until we take down the state flag, then it will go away 
Posted on 10/26/15 at 11:57 pm to just1dawg
No. The non-importation of slaves act of 1807 was passed for two reasons. 1. The trade was deplorable and immoral. 2. The Northern States were tired of an uneven playing field regarding labor costs.
However, thousands more blacks were illegally smuggled into the States via the Louisiana Bayous around Barataria to Galveston by Pierre and Jean Lafitte and dozens of other Privateers/Corsairs well into the 1820s. The ships of these corsairs were given privateer commissions and flew under the flags of Revolutionary juntas in Mexico and Cartagena trying to break away from Spanish control. Most slaves that were sold illegally after Jan 1808 were taken as prizes from Spanish merchant ships filled with Africans bound to be sold into slavery in their Caribbean, Central and South American colonies. The Lafitte operations seized the ships under questionable privateer commissions and off loaded the goods on Grande Isle west of NOLA. An island and pass that only their ships could access as the American and Spanish frigates were to large to pursue beyond the pass. Transferred to pirogues, the slaves would paddled miles above NOLA via various bayous to be sold at auction from $400-$700. After that operation was busted up around 1814, the privateers just moved their operation to Galveston. The slaves were sent up the Sabine River which was the boundary between the U.S. Louisiana purchase territory and Spanish territory. They were sold on the Spanish side to Americans who traveled from afar for the notorious Lafitte auctions. The Spanish had no precense their to police the sale of the slaves taken from their ships and the U.S. had no legal jurisdiction.
However, thousands more blacks were illegally smuggled into the States via the Louisiana Bayous around Barataria to Galveston by Pierre and Jean Lafitte and dozens of other Privateers/Corsairs well into the 1820s. The ships of these corsairs were given privateer commissions and flew under the flags of Revolutionary juntas in Mexico and Cartagena trying to break away from Spanish control. Most slaves that were sold illegally after Jan 1808 were taken as prizes from Spanish merchant ships filled with Africans bound to be sold into slavery in their Caribbean, Central and South American colonies. The Lafitte operations seized the ships under questionable privateer commissions and off loaded the goods on Grande Isle west of NOLA. An island and pass that only their ships could access as the American and Spanish frigates were to large to pursue beyond the pass. Transferred to pirogues, the slaves would paddled miles above NOLA via various bayous to be sold at auction from $400-$700. After that operation was busted up around 1814, the privateers just moved their operation to Galveston. The slaves were sent up the Sabine River which was the boundary between the U.S. Louisiana purchase territory and Spanish territory. They were sold on the Spanish side to Americans who traveled from afar for the notorious Lafitte auctions. The Spanish had no precense their to police the sale of the slaves taken from their ships and the U.S. had no legal jurisdiction.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:02 am to just1dawg
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 12:00 am
Posted on 10/27/15 at 12:02 am to fr33manator
The south would be like Eastern Europe. Just weird white people without jobs.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 7:42 am to AUCE05
quote:
Eastern Europe. Just weird white people without jobs.
And hot women
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:02 am to fr33manator
yes there is legal slavery everywhere that Islam has control of government.
This post was edited on 10/27/15 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:13 am to ZekeTheTeke
quote:
Many leaders of the confederacy had moral objections to it as well. Just like now, the poor, uneducated, racists of the day would've fought tooth and nail to keep it around, but the business men of the time (many, slave owners) saw the writing on the wall.
Yea, this is pretty much the exact opposite of the truth.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:33 am to AU66
quote:I agree, if the demand for the product wasn't there, due to a boycott based on labor practices, the labor practices would have changed.
What would have ended it was the world`s quickly changing view of slavery, as soon as France and England stopped buying southern cotton
If not, then it would certainly have ended by the 1920s after the boll weevil practically destroyed the southern cotton crop. It would have been economically disastrous to keep slaves and provide for them without being able to make money from their labor.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:51 am to fr33manator
Trick question. There was no American Civil War. It was the war of northern aggression.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:00 pm to PJinAtl
Plus there would have been competition from the Irish, Italians and chinamen.
Cheaper to pay a mick a pittance and let him worry about his lot in life than to house, feed and care for slaves.
Cheaper to pay a mick a pittance and let him worry about his lot in life than to house, feed and care for slaves.
Popular
Back to top

1










