- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Southern hero Thomas 'Stonewall' Jackson crossed over the river 154 years ago today
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:59 pm to WeeWee
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:59 pm to WeeWee
Are you serious? We didn't convict all the Nazis and Japanese military officers who basically committed genocide and caused thousands/millions of deaths. I mean we did at the very top, but there's a lot we didn't, at least not at first. Bc we were fricking tired, and wanted to go home, and didn't feel like killing half the population of Germany/Japan for war crimes.
It was the same situation after the Civil War. The North just wanted the country back together. They didn't want to round up and try thousands of people. That's no way to reunite a country. This isn't some sort of factual issue where it's ambiguous, like a murder trial. Treason was committed. Unequivocally. If what the South, especially the southern officers who had been in the US army, didn't commit treason then no one has ever committed treason. The North just decided to forgive, at least on the surface, bc they wanted the country back together
It was the same situation after the Civil War. The North just wanted the country back together. They didn't want to round up and try thousands of people. That's no way to reunite a country. This isn't some sort of factual issue where it's ambiguous, like a murder trial. Treason was committed. Unequivocally. If what the South, especially the southern officers who had been in the US army, didn't commit treason then no one has ever committed treason. The North just decided to forgive, at least on the surface, bc they wanted the country back together
Posted on 5/11/17 at 12:03 am to tigerfan88
The south was not trying to overthrow the government, it was trying to get away from it, quite a difference.
The Civil War was no different than the Revolutionary War with the exception that the oppressor was the victor.
The Civil War was no different than the Revolutionary War with the exception that the oppressor was the victor.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 12:09 am to GREENHEAD22
Exactly, and the founding fathers were traitors too. One of the big differences is, and this point can be twisted all sorts of ways but it's true, the South in general was trying to break away bc they were worried they were going to lose slavery. There wasn't any sort of oppression or atrocities being committed. And I'm not impugning the character of these guys, they weren't evil. They were doing what they thought was right, and race just wasn't viewed the same way back then as it is now.
But attempting to break off from the lawful and legitimate government you're a part of bc you were outvoted in a democratic process is treason. I would say the same thing if California and New York tried to break away now.
And in hindsight, with the events of the 20th century, I'm frankly astounded to realize people are ignorant enough to think a Confederate victory would have been likely to be a net positive in the long term
But attempting to break off from the lawful and legitimate government you're a part of bc you were outvoted in a democratic process is treason. I would say the same thing if California and New York tried to break away now.
And in hindsight, with the events of the 20th century, I'm frankly astounded to realize people are ignorant enough to think a Confederate victory would have been likely to be a net positive in the long term
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 12:14 am
Posted on 5/11/17 at 12:22 am to tigerfan88
At the rate this country is going I'm not so sure I would agree with you on that last part. Furthermore slavery was only going to last another one to two decades at most before technology would make the use of slaves unnecessary and uneconomical. I suspect a reunion would have happened down the road.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 12:33 am to GREENHEAD22
quote:
Furthermore slavery was only going to last another one to two decades at most before technology would make the use of slaves unnecessary and uneconomical.
This is the most callous, cold blooded re-telling of events. So it really didn't matter at all that 4 million people were being held down, tortured, brutalized and treated as sub-human. Even the "hero" the OP is celebrating owned slaves. He even gave a family member one as a gift. What a swell guy. How is this even remotely ok that this was going on and how can you treat it as just a product of the times? It was evil and it had to end..
Posted on 5/11/17 at 12:45 am to brmark70816
I never said slavery wasn't wrong, also those are very dramatic terms that would describe a small minority of slave treatment in the south not the majority.
Most people can not look at slavery in the light as it was seen then which gives most a skewed and inaccurate view.
Also most today were taught a flawed history which doesn't help the matter.
Most people can not look at slavery in the light as it was seen then which gives most a skewed and inaccurate view.
Also most today were taught a flawed history which doesn't help the matter.
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 12:49 am
Posted on 5/11/17 at 12:51 am to brmark70816
quote:
It was evil and it had to end..
It had been the way of the world since the beginning of time. And it's still practiced today in certain areas.
quote:
being held down, tortured, brutalized and treated as sub-human.
The majority were not brutalized or tortured, treated as property, sure. But if you think plantation owners went around beating their slaves day in and day out... Well you're just dumb. Why would they starve and beat slaves to death constantly when their livelihood depended on the slaves work?
Now Caribbean banana plantations and all that on the islands? THAT was more akin to what you are describing.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 12:53 am to weagle99
Stonewall Jackson was one of the brightest generals in the history of the planet and also happens to have been one of the devoutest Christians in the history of the religion
I HIGHLY recommend "Rebel Yell" to anyone who might be remotely interested in him, personally I am in awe of the man
I HIGHLY recommend "Rebel Yell" to anyone who might be remotely interested in him, personally I am in awe of the man
Posted on 5/11/17 at 12:59 am to beerJeep
Spot on.
The south was actually a relatively small player however they are the only ones ever singled out.
The south was actually a relatively small player however they are the only ones ever singled out.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 1:03 am to beerJeep
quote:
The majority were not brutalized or tortured, treated as property, sure. But if you think plantation owners went around beating their slaves day in and day out... Well you're just dumb. Why would they starve and beat slaves to death constantly when their livelihood depended on the slaves work?
You cannot be this stupid. You take people, rip them away from their families and friends, sell them at a whim. They have no rights, no voice, no say, no freedom of movement and can't study or believe what they want. You force them to work when you want and how long you want. You give them rags to wear, scraps to eat (horrible diet trends that exist to this day). Yes, they are beaten and abused when they resist. You breed them, you take their children and repeat the cycle. You make them live in horrible conditions. I can keep going on, but it's just not necessary. It is, was and has always been pure evil. There is no romanticizing it or degrees that make it acceptable in some cases..
Posted on 5/11/17 at 1:07 am to brmark70816
Proving my point about how most were taught flawed history.
Do yourself a favor and study up on the subject so you are not as ignorant on it.
Do yourself a favor and study up on the subject so you are not as ignorant on it.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 1:11 am to brmark70816
quote:
You take people, rip them away from their families and friends, sell them at a whim
Okay? What's your point? It is something that has been done for thousands of years. I have ancestors who owned slaves. And I have ancestors who were slaves. As do you. And every. Single. Other. Person.
quote:
You force them to work when you want and how long you want. You give them rags to wear, scraps to eat (horrible diet trends that exist to this day).
Serious question... How many books have you read on this subject? How many slave accounts have you read? Plantation owners journals? I've read a plethora of them. And your rash generalizations are quite off base.
quote:
You breed them,
The NFL and NBA are glad we did.
quote:
can keep going on, but it's just not necessary
I'm actually curious on your sources. Because from what I've seen this far is a lot of ignorant generalizations that are quite overstated.
quote:
It is, was and has always been pure evil. There is no romanticizing it or degrees that make it acceptable in some cases..
Correct in today's world. But for 98% of our existence, you are wrong.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 1:42 am to beerJeep
You're preaching to the choir on some of this stuff. The fact that the "evil what patriarchy south" gets lambasted for slavery as if it was the only civilization that perpetrated it is absurd. It was Africans who kidnapped and sold their fellow Africans into slavery, just as eager to make a profit as white people.
That being said, by 1860 the South was really the only part of the Western world still practicing deep institutionalize official slavery. Not only practicing it, but so devoutly believed in it that they were willing to tear apart the country and betray their oaths for it. Stonewall was a legend, so was Lee and so was Longstreet, and I don't think any of the three were evil people. In fact they were all good men. It doesn't change the fact that their cause was unjust, not only bc of slavery, but bc they were trying to tear apart a country bc they didn't like how an election went
That being said, by 1860 the South was really the only part of the Western world still practicing deep institutionalize official slavery. Not only practicing it, but so devoutly believed in it that they were willing to tear apart the country and betray their oaths for it. Stonewall was a legend, so was Lee and so was Longstreet, and I don't think any of the three were evil people. In fact they were all good men. It doesn't change the fact that their cause was unjust, not only bc of slavery, but bc they were trying to tear apart a country bc they didn't like how an election went
Posted on 5/11/17 at 1:53 am to tigerfan88
quote:
by 1860 the South was really the only part of the Western world still practicing deep institutionalize official slavery
South America say hi. in fact, the plan was to ship the newly freed slaves down to south America to work on their plantations after the war
Who's plan? Oh... Good ole abe lincoln!
quote:
bc they were trying to tear apart a country bc they didn't like how an election went
Smh
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 1:54 am
Posted on 5/11/17 at 2:06 am to beerJeep
Yes, let's look to Brazil for guiding lights of civilization and justice. Western civilization...aka Europe. Keep beating that neo-Confederate Lost Cause drum. The South fought over slavery and lost, and then successfully managed to propagandize the war as a patriotic defense of their way of life.
"T]he greatest efforts made by the defeated insurgents since the close of the war have been to promulgate the idea that the cause of liberty, justice, humanity, equality, and all the calendar of the virtues of freedom, suffered violence and wrong when the effort for southern independence failed. This is, of course, intended as a species of political cant, whereby the crime of treason might be covered with a counterfeit varnish of patriotism, so that the precipitators of the rebellion might go down in history hand in hand with the defenders of the government, thus wiping out with their own hands their own stains; a species of self-forgiveness amazing in its effrontery, when it is considered that life and property—justly forfeited by the laws of the country, of war, and of nations, through the magnanimity of the government and people—was not exacted from them."
—?George Henry Thomas, November 1868.[13]
George Henry Thomas was a Virginian who didn't abandon his oaths of loyalty to the United States Army. Probably the best pure tactician in the Union Army funnily enough. Virginia does military generals and Presidents like no ones business
"T]he greatest efforts made by the defeated insurgents since the close of the war have been to promulgate the idea that the cause of liberty, justice, humanity, equality, and all the calendar of the virtues of freedom, suffered violence and wrong when the effort for southern independence failed. This is, of course, intended as a species of political cant, whereby the crime of treason might be covered with a counterfeit varnish of patriotism, so that the precipitators of the rebellion might go down in history hand in hand with the defenders of the government, thus wiping out with their own hands their own stains; a species of self-forgiveness amazing in its effrontery, when it is considered that life and property—justly forfeited by the laws of the country, of war, and of nations, through the magnanimity of the government and people—was not exacted from them."
—?George Henry Thomas, November 1868.[13]
George Henry Thomas was a Virginian who didn't abandon his oaths of loyalty to the United States Army. Probably the best pure tactician in the Union Army funnily enough. Virginia does military generals and Presidents like no ones business
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 2:17 am
Posted on 5/11/17 at 2:49 am to magildachunks
You are wrong. The South believed they had a right to secede from the Union. They might have been right. Let the legal scholars debate that one, but they did attempt to form their own nation. A traitor commits a harmful act against the nation he is a citizen of. The leaders of the Confederacy renounced their US Citizenship, they could not have been traitors.
On the other argument, Erwin Rommel was a soldier and an honorable man. Heinrich Himmler was a political hack and one of the architects of the Holocaust, indeed he was in charge of it. Big difference.
On the other argument, Erwin Rommel was a soldier and an honorable man. Heinrich Himmler was a political hack and one of the architects of the Holocaust, indeed he was in charge of it. Big difference.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 4:55 am to brmark70816
Blacks were used as political pawns then just like they are today.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 5:19 am to tigerfan88
quote:
It was Africans who kidnapped and sold their fellow Africans into slavery, just as eager to make a profit as white people.
At the time there was no such thing as an Pan-African identity. The people sold were captives of tribal war. The people sold weren't seen as fellow people any more than Europeans thought they were buying their own people.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 5:23 am to beerJeep
quote:
Okay? What's your point? It is something that has been done for thousands of years. I have ancestors who owned slaves. And I have ancestors who were slaves. As do you. And every. Single. Other. Person.
New World Slavery slavery of the south was much different than ancient slavery or that of the Near East.
Which ancestors of yours were enslaved?
Posted on 5/11/17 at 5:32 am to GREENHEAD22
quote:
Furthermore slavery was only going to last another one to two decades at most before technology would make the use of slaves unnecessary and uneconomical
What are you basing this off of? What technological growth happened in the latter half of the 1800s would have decreased profitability?
Robert Fogel of University of Chicago has written "the demand for American cotton continued to grow down to the early 1920s more rapidly than the South was able to respond and supply." Even if it would have decreased in profitability the institution would have stayed in place to protect racial hierarchy.
No to mention if you read or watch the documentary Slavery by Another Name, you'll see how black men were exploited and forced into labor in a variety of ways, the mines of Georgia being one. To suggest that slavery wouldn't be profitable in a diversified economy is nonsense.
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 5:35 am
Popular
Back to top


0






