- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: South Louisiana Softball player gets away with cheapshot
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:15 pm to Chad504boy
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:15 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
a batter/runner that is deemed OUT in the field of play has a duty to remove her arse from any interference there in that continues on the field.
Ok, and I'm soliciting proposals. How does she get from the batters box back to the dugout "to remove herself from any interference . . .?" How does she do that?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:15 pm to lsupride87
I think I see what Chad is saying.
This is followed by "or." Thus, one can interpret this as written to say, if you hinder a catcher's throw by steping out of the box, regardless of where its thrown, it violates this rule. There is nothing written in this first part before "or" about the hinderance being on a catcher's play attempt on a runner, etc. Thats only in the part after the "or" that follows:
"any other movement" means other than stepping out of the batter's box. This "any other movement" has to "hinder[] the catcher’s play at home plate or the catcher’s attempt to throw or to play on a runner.” This makes it part of an ump's judgment about whether the catcher is making a play.
Maybe they need to spell that out a little better.
quote:
Rule 7-4-2:
“The batter shall not hinder the catcher’s fielding or throwing by stepping out of the batter’s box. . .
This is followed by "or." Thus, one can interpret this as written to say, if you hinder a catcher's throw by steping out of the box, regardless of where its thrown, it violates this rule. There is nothing written in this first part before "or" about the hinderance being on a catcher's play attempt on a runner, etc. Thats only in the part after the "or" that follows:
quote:
or making any other movement that hinders the catcher’s play at home plate or the catcher’s attempt to throw or to play on a runner.”
"any other movement" means other than stepping out of the batter's box. This "any other movement" has to "hinder[] the catcher’s play at home plate or the catcher’s attempt to throw or to play on a runner.” This makes it part of an ump's judgment about whether the catcher is making a play.
Maybe they need to spell that out a little better.
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:16 pm to Chad504boy
There's another video out there that shows it from a different angle. The catcher threw the ball at least 45 degrees off the line of the basepath. The batter wasn't anywhere near the play. Now, the exact wording of the rule may call that interference, but it was a bush league move by the catcher and a bush league coach to teach that to his players.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:18 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
Ok, and I'm soliciting proposals. How does she get from the batters box back to the dugout "to remove herself from any interference . . .?" How does she do that?
by the time there's a strikeout, a throw back to the pitcher, a steal home, a throw home then a catcher throwing back to third that this said proposed throw would interfere with the original batter that struck out.... yes, she has a duty to remove herself from the scene after the strikeout
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:18 pm to Jim Rockford
I posted that second video already, it's in this thread as well.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:27 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
the exact wording of the rule may call that interference, but it was a bush league move by the catcher and a bush league coach to teach that to his players.
glad you're on my side.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:28 pm to SWLA92
Criminal charges and should never play again.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:32 pm to SWLA92
I don’t think she meant to do it.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:41 pm to JoeyP239
quote:
I don’t think she meant to do it.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:44 pm to Chad504boy
But a face is a very small target. If she was deliberately trying to hit the batter why not throw at their body?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:44 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
yes, she has a duty to remove herself from the scene after the strikeout
Ok, how?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:46 pm to JoeyP239
quote:
But a face is a very small target. If she was deliberately trying to hit the batter why not throw at their body?
that's how they teach. A player has a helmet, its at the height of release point of close range from the catcher. the catcher shuffles side and back to get the close proximity of target and angle.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:49 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
Ok, how?
by moving her feet hurrily. you're scenario is a bit wild.
this year, we were on bad end of double out play when batter hit a ball in play and was out, she ran through first. On her way back down the line, i forget but she interfered with first baseman or some off line throw a bit while she was in foul territory after deemed out. She had an obligation to make sure she's out the way of live action. We got an interference out called on it.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:56 pm to Chad504boy
I'll post this without any of my own commentary that a x poster posted reply to op tweet.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:09 pm to Chad504boy
That is taught by coaches that want the fans to think they are "so smart" and they know every little detail in the rules.
But, yeah, if that would have happened to one of my players, I would have been fired because I would have been in two fights that day- One with the opposing coach and the other with her Dad.
I would rather lose a damn game then to tell one of my players to "throw the ball at the girl's head so we can get an out at 3rd". Something is wrong with your mind if you do that or coach that.
But, yeah, if that would have happened to one of my players, I would have been fired because I would have been in two fights that day- One with the opposing coach and the other with her Dad.
I would rather lose a damn game then to tell one of my players to "throw the ball at the girl's head so we can get an out at 3rd". Something is wrong with your mind if you do that or coach that.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:12 pm to Chad504boy
Lol not even close to the same
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:22 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
by moving her feet hurrily. you're scenario is a bit wild.
There's nothing wild about it. Stealing home happens. And the P will throw home to try and get the runner out. And if the runner retreats, then the C may well fire it to 3B to get the runner. And all that's gonna happen really fast.
Erect a plane on a line from the C to 3B. The batter has to traverse that plane. Whether hastily or slowly that are gonna be in the "bean" zone.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:23 pm to JoeyP239
She basically celebrated with her coach as she got to the dugout. If she had any compassion she would have checked on the batter she assaulted.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:26 pm to SWLA92
That was taught by her coach. Coach told her anytime some is moving out the box to throw through them regardless if they are actually in line with the play.
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:43 pm to LSUDAN1
Happened again last night. Grand Lake vs Mangham. Not quite as violent but still throwing at a batter moving just to get the interference out.
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 4:47 pm
Popular
Back to top


1



