Started By
Message

re: Some thoughts on the mentally ill, violence and mass shootings.

Posted on 10/26/23 at 6:52 pm to
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
11474 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 6:52 pm to
I would phrase, they rarely contribute to. If so, typically the paranoid schizophrenic
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
7342 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

Stanford esteemed professor, Robert Sapolsky, would argue that free will doesn’t exist and a person who becomes a murderer is not responsible for how he/she acts.


His interview with Skeptic Magazine's Michael Shermer was really fascinating. I thought it was going to be a philosophical discussion with a bunch of woo woo non sense but it was very grounded. Im not over the hill of completely accepting no free will but I'm much closer to the peak. Most will attack the notion because of the ramifications but its worth listen



LINK
This post was edited on 10/26/23 at 7:01 pm
Posted by Fat Harry
70115
Member since Mar 2005
2217 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:00 pm to
Did not read all that but we must re-open mental hospitals.
Posted by TCO
Member since Jul 2022
2511 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

Yet mass shootings increased exponentially after the internet became mainstream


FIFY
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
14198 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

Not contribute? They may not be the only factor but not sure how you can say they don't or can't contribute. And in some cases literal structural damage to the brain or illness has been cited as contributing factors.


Mental illness does not make someone more likely to commit acts of violence. The mentally ill commit violence against others at the same rate as the general population.

Monsters can have mental illness too but the illness doesn't make the monster do what he does. Nor does it trigger him.

The characterologically defective can also get depressed, have mood swings and suffer from psychosis but these things do not set the stage for his violence. His defect of character does that.

It's a mistake to pigeonhole any sort of mass shooter as being mentally ill. To do so makes an inner city gangster mentally ill. An indiscriminate Hamas murderer mentally ill. A terrorist bomber mentally ill.

What all of these types of mass killers have in common is that they're aggrieved or they've fashioned themselves as victims. They've systematically turned the rest of us into objects or obstacles. Nothing more than insects to be squashed. That process takes time. It's a personal journey and it doesn't happen quickly.

This post was edited on 10/26/23 at 7:08 pm
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
7342 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

There is no answer for these types as they are beyond treatable - medications do not work, therapy does not work


How do you know it doesn't work? Perhaps not all the time but that seems hard to determine
This post was edited on 10/26/23 at 7:07 pm
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
7342 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

It's a mistake to pigeonhole any sort of mass shooter as being mentally ill


I get what you are saying and agree but I think there are also cases where it is a contributing factor and if the warning signs had been acknowledged and treatment sought perhaps the outcome would be different. The is no one answer to solve this and I don't think we really can but just do our best to limit the number.
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
14198 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

quote:
There is no answer for these types as they are beyond treatable - medications do not work, therapy does not work


How do you know it doesn't work? Perhaps not all the time but that seems hard to determine


In children and adolescents. The characterological disorder that blossoms into what we see in adulthood is called conduct disorder. It's the kid version of anti-social personality disorder.

If caught early in childhood and put on the couch, therapy can have an impact. Otherwise once crystallized in adulthood, anti-social personality disorder is hopeless. It's over.

In fact there's a clinical school of thought that says make no attempt to treat the disorder in adults at all. It's thought that the patient will simply use the skills given in therapy to manipulate and harm others, not to self improve.

A good example of this would be Tony Soprano. Therapy made him a more manipulative and better boss but did nothing to help him become a better person.
This post was edited on 10/26/23 at 7:17 pm
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
11474 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:27 pm to
25 years experience in inpatient psychiatric treatment - civil, forensic, manifestly dangerous, maximum security [NGRI]

The best predictor of future behavior > past behavior
This post was edited on 10/26/23 at 7:30 pm
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
14198 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

We talking about the 15 killings every weekend in Chicago?



If these shootings fit the definition of a mass shooting (and they often do), then yes.
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
7342 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

fact there's a clinical school of thought that says make no attempt to treat the disorder in adults at all. It's thought that the patient will simply use the skills given in therapy to manipulate and harm others, not to self improve.


Interesting
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
11474 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:33 pm to
Sounds like making criminals more criminal in the penal system
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
14198 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

quote:
fact there's a clinical school of thought that says make no attempt to treat the disorder in adults at all. It's thought that the patient will simply use the skills given in therapy to manipulate and harm others, not to self improve.


Interesting



Anti-social personality disorder is an interesting thing.

It's often said that if you're unintelligent, you end up dead or in prison. If you are intelligent, you end up a Corporate VP.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43342 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

FIFY


Now you're asking the appropriate questions.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111012 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

None of these mass shooters heard voices or saw things that compelled them to enage in these acts


quote:

The Maine bulletin also states that Card recently reported mental health issues, including "hearing voices and threats to shoot up the National Guard Base in Saco, ME."


Next excuse?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68347 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

What you're describing is someone who is psychotic, not anti-social, which is a mental illness.
You are incorrect. What he described were characteristics of anti-social personality.

quote:

Being anti social doesn't make you shoot up random people in public places. Being mentally ill does
Both anti-social personalities and mental illness can lead to shooting random strangers.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78804 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 10:21 pm to
I agree with the OP that all these talks about mental illness don’t talk enough about antisocial criminal sociopathy. What we called “ evil “ until the elites forbade it 15 minutes ago.
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
30276 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

They are to be contained as they are a clear danger to society.


Truth but how do you identify them? Who makes that decision?
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
8224 posts
Posted on 10/26/23 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

People don't fully understand how little mental illness has to do with acts of violence, gun or otherwise.


The premise of this statement is that we (society) all agree on the definition of "Mental Illness". Sure there are obvious cases, but there will never be consensus on who is and isn't mentally ill.

EDIT
To add, even if there were a consensus, the goal posts move over time. An example would be transgenders. As recent as twenty years ago, a person wishing to mutilate his/her body in the name of self defining their gender wouldve been considered a mental illness. Hell the thought of self defining ones gender in itself wouldve had someone diagnosed as mentally ill.
This post was edited on 10/26/23 at 10:52 pm
Posted by DatNolaClap
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2015
1822 posts
Posted on 10/27/23 at 12:26 am to
It seems like you’re arguing semantics tbh.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram