- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:33 am to LNCHBOX
Yea no shite, insurance makes home owner whole then insurance company goes after the city for compensation.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:34 am to LNCHBOX
Yeah. I was obviously commenting based on the story saying the amount covered housing and deductibles. If the amount is 7,500 or 10,000 so be it. But I bet the family wants 1.3 million for their 130,000 tract home.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:35 am to Gusoline
quote:
So you want the city to pay for everything instead of paying their insurance deductible and housing while it's fixed? Why? They have insurance, let them use it with no out of pocket.
Whose going to pay for their higher rates now? This wasn't an accident. It was CLEARLY the fault of the city. Why shouldn't the city bear responsibility for making the homeowner whole?
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:35 am to LNCHBOX
quote:quote:
Insurance company should be left to sue the city for compensation
Wut? This is what you buy insurance for.
Insurance companies sue for restoration all the time. Your insurance policy is to cover your expenses. They are entitled to attempt to recover that money from the responsible party.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:37 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
How much would since you seem to have the details.
I spent 20 yrs in the military and while the military moved us and we per diem, etc. there are tons of things that are out of pocket
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:38 am to SSpaniel
quote:
Whose going to pay for their higher rates now? This wasn't an accident. It was CLEARLY the fault of the city. Why shouldn't the city bear responsibility for making the homeowner whole?
People pay higher rates for not at fault accidents all the time.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
they're lucky those genius cops didn't call CPS and arrest the parents for this grave crime
There is nothing wrong with letting a 9 y/o stay home while you get the groceries. They are fully competent and should know how to use a phone by that age.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:39 am to GetCocky11
quote:
The court acknowledged that this may seem “unfair,” but when police have to protect the public, they can’t be “burdened with the condition” that they compensate whoever is damaged by their actions along the way.
Protect some of the public....not ALL of the public. Need to get WallyWorld's property back to them so some chinese sweat shop doesn't need to go into triple overtime hours to make up for the loss.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:39 am to Wtodd
quote:
I spent 20 yrs in the military and while the military moved us and we per diem, etc. there are tons of things that are out of pocket
That's a lot of words to not answer the question.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:40 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
That's a lot of words to not answer the question.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:40 am to Wtodd
I'll take that as an admission that perhaps you don't actually know.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:45 am to Wtodd
quote:
Police blew up an innocent man’s house in search of an armed shoplifter.
Well he was in the house and holed up in the house for 19 hours before he was arrested
quote:
The suspect, Robert Jonathan Seacat, had stolen a shirt and a couple of belts from a Walmart
He also tried to run over a cop and was sentenced to a 100 years in prison
LINK
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 9:46 am
Posted on 10/30/19 at 9:57 am to Space Cadet
quote:
a SWAT team fired gas munition and 40-millimeter rounds through the windows, drove an armored vehicle through the doors, tossed flash-bang grenades inside and used explosives to blow out the walls.
FOR --
quote:
Robert Jonathan Seacat, had stolen a shirt and a couple of belts from a Walmart
Posted on 10/30/19 at 10:10 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Unless the cops are paying it out of pocket, that's just teaching the tax payers a lesson, no?
Maybe they need a lesson too.
Civics is a lost art apparently.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 10:28 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Wut? This is what you buy insurance for.
Cops blowing up your house is not the reason you buy insurance. Most policies would probably exclude coverage for this type of damage.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 10:30 am to LNCHBOX
Do you even subrogate bro
Posted on 10/30/19 at 10:31 am to DCtiger1
quote:
Cops blowing up your house is not the reason you buy insurance
I buy insurance for my property in case anything happens to it.
quote:
Most policies would probably exclude coverage for this type of damage.
I'm willing to look at some fine print that says this if you have it
Posted on 10/30/19 at 10:33 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
buy insurance for my property in case anything happens to it.
You think your HO policy covers ALL perils?
Posted on 10/30/19 at 10:34 am to DCtiger1
quote:
You think your HO policy covers ALL perils?
Yep, that's definitely what I said.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News