- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So Is J&J Vaccine More Geared for the Younger/Healthier Population?
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:36 pm
Reading quite a bit about J&J vaccine, it doesn’t seem as harsh as the other two but it also is not quite as effective.
Is the thought that J&J vaccine would be best used to cover the general population who are lower risk?
Is the thought that J&J vaccine would be best used to cover the general population who are lower risk?
7
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:37 pm to STEVED00
Seems like with it being one dose and the easier storage capabilities, it would be better for rural/underserved areas.
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:41 pm to STEVED00
quote:
but it also is not quite as effective.
It's just as effective for severe disease.
It didn't stop mild symptoms as much but who gives a shite?
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:42 pm to STEVED00
Id prefer an mRNA vaccine
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:43 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Id prefer an mRNA vaccine
Why?
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:44 pm to STEVED00
It's also geared for the demographic that isn't likely to go to the "trouble" of getting a follow-up shot.
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:44 pm to boxcarbarney
quote:
Id prefer an mRNA vaccine
Why?
its more effective and safe...
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:44 pm to boxcarbarney
More steps involved in gaining immunity from a DNA vaccine (J&J) vs mRNA
Plus this uses a whole inactivated adenovirus. Theoretically more that your body could react to though still very safe
Plus this uses a whole inactivated adenovirus. Theoretically more that your body could react to though still very safe
This post was edited on 2/24/21 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:44 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
Seems like with it being one dose and the easier storage capabilities, it would be better for rural/underserved areas.
this is your answer.
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:44 pm to STEVED00
J&J exterminatinggggg
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:45 pm to STEVED00
If I'm going to get one, that is the one I will get.
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:46 pm to beerJeep
quote:
J&J exterminatinggggg
Yeahhhhhh
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:46 pm to STEVED00
isn't this the same company that got sued over the talcum powder/shower to shower thing?
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:47 pm to MorbidTheClown
quote:
isn't this the same company that got sued over the talcum powder/shower to shower thing?
You mean the frivolous suit? Yeah. Correlation is not causation
Posted on 2/24/21 at 1:54 pm to Cosmo
quote:
You mean the frivolous suit? Yeah. Correlation is not causation
lol law of averages really screws with stuff. gives laymen nonsense worries.
Posted on 2/24/21 at 2:08 pm to Cosmo
quote:
You mean the frivolous suit? Yeah. Correlation is not causation
I have a friend who does plaintiff work.
While I'm sure he's biased, I do get their research which is a lot less positive than what J&J put out regarding the talc case.
There's a lot of wordplay in those statements, what they tested etc.
Couldn't tell you who is actually right.
This post was edited on 2/24/21 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 2/24/21 at 2:15 pm to Cosmo
All lawsuits are frivolous unless they’re filed by Sidney Powell or Lynn Wood. And I ain’t taken any fricking vaccine. Lol at Biden and Gates thinking they can gain access to my brain.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News