- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So-called "moon landing"
Posted on 2/25/24 at 3:43 pm to CutTheCord
Posted on 2/25/24 at 3:43 pm to CutTheCord
quote:
Answer the question or move on.
The space station is moving at about 17,500 mph therefore the astronauts inside are also moving at 17,500 mph. Whey they step outside, as they are in a vacuum, there is no outside force to act on them, therefore they remain moving at the same speed as the space station. There is literally nothing to rip them to shreds.
Satisfied? (Somehow, I doubt it).
And to answer your other question, it's a Kirby vacuum
This post was edited on 2/25/24 at 3:46 pm
1
Posted on 2/25/24 at 3:45 pm to Scuttle But
quote:
They have to be trolling. They just have to be right?
I feel the same way about people who believe humans traveled to the Moon and back 6 times.
F/king sheep.
Posted on 2/25/24 at 3:46 pm to Scuttle But
quote:
Landing on the moan is literally easier than fabricating a massive hoax about it.
I can hear you moaning already.
So why have we been the only country to do it? And why haven't we achieved better in 50 years?
Don't use money as an excuse. If it's so easy I'll ask you why you haven't been?
This post was edited on 2/25/24 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 2/25/24 at 3:51 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
It's on the other side... the one we can't see.
Posted on 2/25/24 at 3:55 pm to CutTheCord
quote:
Someone please explain how it's possible for a human to open a spaceship door and step out at 17,500 miles per hour and not be ripped to shreds.
Man, dat wind would be turrible, woodn't it tho?
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:05 pm to NC_Tigah
My I ask why you think we have a Space Force? Space is militarized right now.
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:12 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
So why have we been the only country to do it? And why haven't we achieved better in 50 years?
Don't use money as an excuse. If it's so easy I'll ask you why you haven't been?
The US set the airspeed record in 1967 and no other nation has beat nor has the US surpassed it despite having better technology now.
By your standards, it must've not happened.
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:15 pm to Hondo Blacksheep
quote:Sure.
My I ask why you think we have a Space Force?
But first explain where all these military, completely hidden, installations are on the moon, and how they got hidden.
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:19 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
What is it exactly that you think will rip the astronaut to shreds?
Space squirrels.
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:21 pm to Scuttle But
quote:
They have to be trolling. They just have to be right?
Unfortunately, I think they truly believe what they are saying.
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:21 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Space squirrels.
I was thinking space piranhas. Deadlier.
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:32 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
MemphisGuy
quote:
NAZA Fanboi / True Believers
quote:
The space station is moving at about 17,500 mph therefore the astronauts inside are also moving at 17,500 mph.
Really? 17,500 mph?? Why not 50,000 mph?? Or 100,000 mph?
This is a religion. Nothing else explains the insistence on such an obvious charade. Yes, perhaps believable until the advent of the Internet and availability of so much knowledge, research at hand, and archival material. BUT NOW?? No excuses.
I know this is hard for you, defending failed cartoon missions, CGI, matte paintings, spaceship miniatures, 3D renderings, Space "Images" of earth, the moon, planets, stars, galaxies, etc etc
"Astronomy Inc" have pulled EVERY single number, size, and "Light Year" distance out of their azz for 150 years. Without a hred of proof other than roaring, "WE HAVE SPOKEN!" (Same as NASA).
There are exactly ZERO convincing proofs of this or anything else NAZA claims:
What have thinking persons seen in broad daylight?
1) slight-of-hand,
2) power of suggestion,
3) crib-to-casket indoctrination,
4) lifetime of Sci-Fi Movies depictions,
5) NAZA-"Science's" sloppy cut-and-paste of the "Earth" lunar "photos",
6) dime-store animation and miniatures
7) "upgraded" since the 2000s by more sloppy green-screen CGI "space" world
8) Terrible TERRIBLE cheesy unbelievable "International Space Station" interviews -- featuring the absurdly mundane, glitched CGI, the cheesy, and mistake filled screw ups.
9)...
*50)
*ALSO available*
The number of Sci-Fi Space Fanatics convinced of the most ridiculous total fairy tale ever is mind-blowing. It's sad commentary that any thinking adult buys any of the ongoing gubmint "space" programming. All kinds of evidence to the contrary can easily be found -- IF it weren't so much for the confirmation bias and child-like naivete.
I'm truly embarrassed for you all.
Your Space Leader, Captain James Kirk, USS Enterprise, aka Wiliam Shatner, asked about the difference bewteen Science and Science Fiction -- "NO DIFFERENCE" (No hesitation)
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:36 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
Your IQ's combined are under 100.
AtlantaSteelersPoodle
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:37 pm to Liberator
quote:
Liberator
You think the earth is flat. Based on that alone, STFU.
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:43 pm to Hooligan's Ghost
quote:
The moon isn't real.
And nobody picked up on your Nights in White Satin lyric?
The
With respect to the Moon and what our initial senses say about its composition.
Appearances can and are often deceiving.
Looks "physical", yes. But IS IT?
Could it be something else? (No one can know for sure, but some believe it is Plasma.)
The moon isn't real.
quote:
Interesting take. In what sense?
"Cold-hearted orb that rules the night,
Removes the colours from our sight.
Red is grey and yellow white.
But we decide which is right.
And which is an illusion?"
And nobody picked up on your Nights in White Satin lyric?
The
With respect to the Moon and what our initial senses say about its composition.
Appearances can and are often deceiving.
Looks "physical", yes. But IS IT?
Could it be something else? (No one can know for sure, but some believe it is Plasma.)
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:44 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
You think the earth is flat. Based on that alone, STFU.
quote:
MemphisGuy
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:44 pm to Liberator
quote:
(No one can know for sure, but some believe it is Plasma.)
No one can know for sure? Lol. You idiot.
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:45 pm to CAD703X
quote:
we are also comparing a brand new 2024 designed spaceship with 1,000,000,000x the computing power we had in the 1960s and it's ability to land right side up like we did flawlessly 6x in a row in the 60s.
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:46 pm to Liberator
I hope this thread never ends. This is so much fun.
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:46 pm to Liberator
quote:
Yes, perhaps believable until the advent of the Internet and availability of so much knowledge, research at hand, and archival material.
Yeah man, give em hell.
You can find whatever flavor of knowledge you're looking for on the interwebs.
Page 45 of 49
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News