Started By
Message

re: Should we rebuild in LP and AP?

Posted on 8/18/16 at 4:17 pm to
Posted by SippyCup
Gulf Coast
Member since Sep 2008
7082 posts
Posted on 8/18/16 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

its all an unknown IMO. we may never see rain like that again. or it could become the norm.


I use the 0.1 percent because it gives perspective of how low the chances are. Sure, its not exact because we don't have a long enough time frame, but the chances are still very low.

My point is, we cant go and abandon entire cities because of one natural disaster. Sure, there are areas where we know they are at higher risk, but I wouldn't consider AP & LP high risk.

At what point do we justify spending X amount of dollars to mitigate losses when the chances of this happening again (even if its higher than 0.1) are extremely small.

quote:

there is also a .1% chance of me banging emily radikowski.


This is the OT. A baller has already been there. Don't lose hope.
This post was edited on 8/18/16 at 4:18 pm
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 8/18/16 at 4:39 pm to
I think God wants LP to stop making meth.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
13055 posts
Posted on 8/18/16 at 5:01 pm to
Any idea how that compares to the federal flood insurance?

As far as the chances of a rain event the magnitude of this one happening again--no one really knows if and when it will happen again. As someone said, we could get 50 inches next week. There is no way to know.

So, do you abandon an entire area for that reason? That's not only unrealistic, but unlikely to happen as well.

Sure, you could pick up and move, but most people won't do that because of family ties.
Posted by ihometiger
Member since Dec 2013
12475 posts
Posted on 8/18/16 at 5:06 pm to
quote:


Message
Should we rebuild in LP and AP? by Chad504boy
we need jet propulsion systems down the amite to push the fricking water faster.


This is exactly the type of thinking that has made the OT famous!!!!!!!
Posted by ihometiger
Member since Dec 2013
12475 posts
Posted on 8/18/16 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

This is the kind of plausible, cost-effective idea for which the OT is famous. Good thinking Chad.


Now that I think about this idea more--it can be cost efficient. How about putting Tugboats side by side every 1/4 of a mile on the Amite & Manchac Rivers and anchor them in place. Then when the rain comes down they go full throttle and push the water down stream.

Thus Chad's incredible jet propulsion idea in a modified format could work. These Tug boats would need to be strategically placed on those rivers so when the unexpected rain event does hit they are already in place.
Posted by MBclass83
Member since Oct 2010
10384 posts
Posted on 8/18/16 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

there is also a .1% chance



So you're saying there's a chance?
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram