Started By
Message

re: Should There Be A Difference in Punishment for Murder and Attempted Murder?

Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:26 am to
Posted by FightingTigers138
In your thoughts
Member since Dec 2016
6011 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:26 am to
quote:

This is not accurate in Louisiana.


I used my own terminology. But referenced a lawyers website. Maybe not in Louisiana.
Posted by Boss13
Mobile
Member since Oct 2016
2174 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Attempted second degree murder is an extension of aggravated assault. Not the same as murder. You don't know exact intent. Unless you have evidence of it planned. Then its 1st degree, as well as a life sentence.



That's not the point I'm contended on. If you have two of the exact same cases and convictions, and in one the victim lives and one the victim doesnt, why shouldn't the punishment be the same?
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53627 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:28 am to
quote:

The only difference in the two charges is outcome.


And that should be the primary objective in determining justice because otherwise you start playing mind reader games.

So you think it’s okay for felony battery to ramp up all the way to “life in prison” based on the hindsight evaluation and possible political motivations of the DA? Don’t you think there is an intermediate move there?
This post was edited on 7/30/20 at 10:30 am
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216686 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:29 am to
In Louisiana if you are convicted of 2nd degree murder you get life without parole. And if you get convicted of 1st degree murder it’s life without parole or execution...... but take out the execution part and tell me the difference.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
88059 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:30 am to
quote:

No thanks. It's obvious.
No, it's not at all.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:30 am to
quote:

because otherwise you start playing mind reader games.


How? You already did by charging it as attempted murder. You’ve already claimed to know the intent to murder was there. The only difference is the victim didn’t die.
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2008
11679 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:31 am to
quote:

DWI is a specific intent crime. Vehicular homicide is a general intent crime.

Both murder and attempted murder are specific intent crimes.


I got the analogy, but I'll play devil's advocate here. DWI may be a specific intent crime, in that you intentionally drove knowing you are impaired. However, you DID NOT intend to kill anyone. If you get in a fight and pull a gun and shoot at someone and miss or just wound them, you DID intend to kill them.
Posted by Boss13
Mobile
Member since Oct 2016
2174 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:32 am to
quote:

And that should be the primary objective in determining justice because otherwise you start playing mind reader games.

So you think it’s okay for simple battery to ramp up all the way to “life in prison” based on the hindsight evaluation and possible political motivations of the DA? Don’t you think there is an intermediate move there?


That distinction is already made in the legal system. 1st, 2nd, 3rd degree murder, assault, assault with a deadly weapon, etc. I'm not arguing that the distinctions should not exist, you are changing the premise. I'm arguing that if you have two similar cases, but one victim lives and one dies, why is there a difference in penalties.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216686 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:32 am to
I agree with this.
Posted by burdman
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
22814 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:33 am to
quote:

I'm arguing that if you have two similar cases, but one victim lives and one dies, why is there a difference in penalties.


Because each part of a crime is judged individually, not as a whole.

ETA: Nevermind. My post doesn't really apply since it talks about what exists vs what should exist. My bad.
This post was edited on 7/30/20 at 10:36 am
Posted by Boss13
Mobile
Member since Oct 2016
2174 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:34 am to
quote:

How? You already did by charging it as attempted murder. You’ve already claimed to know the intent to murder was there. The only difference is the victim didn’t die.


Exactly! Point well made.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
80902 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:36 am to
I've always said you shouldn't get a lighter sentence because you're a poor shot.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58632 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:37 am to
quote:

DWI is a specific intent crime. Vehicular homicide is a general intent crime.

Both murder and attempted murder are specific intent crimes.


Josh just got pwned
Posted by Boss13
Mobile
Member since Oct 2016
2174 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Because each part of a crime is judged individually, not as a whole.


That's an obtuse response. Please elaborate. For the sake of the discussion:

Man 1 and man 2 both plan to go home and shoot their wives in the exact same way. Man 1 succeeds and Man 2 misses. Should the punishment be the same? Assume both have the exact same homelife, backstory, and plan.

ETA: Just saw your ETA
This post was edited on 7/30/20 at 10:40 am
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
58315 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Please explain.


Intent? Maybe DWI and involuntary manslaughter is more applicable.
Posted by burdman
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
22814 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:38 am to
quote:

That's an obtuse response. Please elaborate. For the sake of the discussion:



I edited my post 3 minutes before you made this response.
Posted by Boss13
Mobile
Member since Oct 2016
2174 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:40 am to
I saw right after I submitted. Takes a minute to type on my phone. My bad.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58632 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Christ have mercy, you’re a jackass.
i argue with lunchbox and much as anyone but you are the bone head in this thread.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
33459 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Josh just got pwned


1. He's wrong.
2. It wouldn't matter, regardless.

quote:

§10. Criminal intent

Criminal intent may be specific or general:

(1) Specific criminal intent is that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.

(2) General criminal intent is present whenever there is specific intent, and also when the circumstances indicate that the offender, in the ordinary course of human experience, must have adverted to the prescribed criminal consequences as reasonably certain to result from his act or failure to act.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89448 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:43 am to
quote:

1. He's wrong


first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram