Started By
Message

re: Settle a drunken argument: Tyson vs Bruce Lee no holds barred KO match

Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:28 pm to
Posted by MrFreakinMiyagi
Reseda
Member since Feb 2007
19693 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

I guess Tyson could go to the judges and ask them to limit Lee's allowed speed. That'd probably be the fairest thing to do in Tyson's case.

Yeah

Tyson was pretty damn slow.
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43482 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Read a lot on Lee. He had to flee Hong Kong because he was street fighting and kicking dudes asses so much. He eventually whipped the wrong guys who was the son of a Triad boss. Lee is by no means a TV martial artist. He also took on a master in San Francisco that was talking smack about him and whipped his arse too.



The whole argument is that none of that can be proven so it's hearsay, rumors, and propaganda. Which is a good point. I'm a big fan of Bruce Lee and his teachings, but it is true that none of his fights are documented and I can see why people will discredit his fighting ability.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Combating the speed of a guy that could end your day if he connected with a kick while you are attempting a takedown or in Mike's case, throwing that trademark left hook.
It comes down to that. Can Lee or Tyson land a fight-ending blow before the wrestler lands the takedown? Once on the ground, the wrestler is going to leave both their faces in a bloody mess.
Posted by Shepherd88
Member since Dec 2013
4878 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:29 pm to
Check out Alain Ngalani. Although bigger than Lee, he does break some legs. However, in UFC the point is not to "break" their knee.

In real actual self defense that kick is aimed lower and it doesn't take much to tear any of the ligaments. So yes its absolutely possible.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39606 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

They don't train to kick knees, but shin often strikes knee when the recipient blocks the leg kick. If it were easy to break a knee and end a fight, don't you think professional fighters would use that tactic? There's a reason they don't do it. Because it hurts like shite and doesn't end the fight.



They also primarily use straight side kicks for their leg kicks do they not? They are also kicking people who are trained to defend against such type of strikes. Tyson is not.

Why are they kicking legs at all then if it doesn't work to end a fight?

What if Lee uses a push kick to over extend the knee and tear the ligaments?

quote:

Don't be so dense, man. There is no proof that a leg kick to the knee is going to break that knee. Even if it's from the legendary Bruce Lee.
Not trying to be dense. You keep trying to explain how something isn't possible based off of people who are not trained or trying to do something. If you don't believe that Lee could land a kick on a knee and break it, okay, just make that your argument. Don't bring up this mma stuff when you yourself are saying they aren't trying to do that.

This post was edited on 2/14/14 at 2:31 pm
Posted by MWP
Kingwood, TX via Monroe, LA
Member since Jul 2013
10957 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

When the two met, it lasted less than 30 seconds. Lumbering dude won.


Royce Gracie didn't due too shabby with those lumbering gigantors and he was the smallest of the brothers. Rickson in his prime would own both Bruce and Tyson, maybe at the same time.
Posted by SettleDown
Everywhere
Member since Nov 2013
1333 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:31 pm to
I think in his prime, Anderson Silva would have beat the dog shite out of Lee and Silva has STILL always had some trouble with brutish guys that could control him and get him to the ground. And, Silva still is 30lbs lighter than Tyson in his prime.

People that say speed always wins must not have seen many street fights. Yes, speed wins if the two are near physical equals or of the slow guy is a mook.

But, if the slow guy is still athletic and outweighs the other guy by 80 lbs, your gonna be a very poor man betting on the smaller dude.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:31 pm to
Interesting. I'll check it out.
Posted by SettleDown
Everywhere
Member since Nov 2013
1333 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:32 pm to
quote:


Royce Gracie didn't due too shabby with those lumbering gigantors and he was the smallest of the brothers
He wasn't in the ring with people who outweighed him by nearly 80lbs. Jeebus f'n christ.
Posted by Scream4LSU
Member since Sep 2007
1182 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:33 pm to
The street fighting in Hong Kong is well documented. The fight with the master in California has 2-3 versions from several eye witnesses all with a decisive victory by lee. Just the length of the bout 3 minutes versus 25 minutes was the dispute. He was a definite bad arse and could whip anyone close to his size easily but don't think he handles Tyson.
This post was edited on 2/14/14 at 2:38 pm
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
33232 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Bruce Lee was like 115lbs. You people are on that dope.


this
Posted by Sevendust912
Member since Jun 2013
11480 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:34 pm to
People act like Tyson is some slow oaf.

Tyson would grab him, tackle him, one punch and over.

Fight would last about 30 seconds
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94684 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Ali and Foreman her near in size. If Ali had weight 140, Foreman would've kicked his arse up one side and down the other.


In a boxing match, no question.

My broader point was that Tyson was much more compact than either of those 2 fighters of similar weight. Foreman was the "Tyson" of his day - not a true swarmer, like Dempsey, Marciano, Frazier or Tyson, Big George was an old school slugger of limited boxing ability - virtually no defensive skills of note (at least in the 1970s - by the time of his comeback, he was much improved, training with the old mongoose, Archie Moore), and still defeated the much more skilled, much more determined, but much shorter Frazier. Ali negated Foreman's height, weighed almost the same, and refused to trade punches with him.

In this case, the chess match as to how each fighter would approach the contest, particularly with a "no holds barred" structure, would just be fascinating - and again, with or without D'Amato in Tyson's corner.

Would it make a difference? Very intriguing.
Posted by MWP
Kingwood, TX via Monroe, LA
Member since Jul 2013
10957 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

Once on the ground, the wrestler is going to leave both their faces in a bloody mess.


I'm guessing this hypothetical wrestler is going to ground and pound once on top. Most wrestlers don't leave your face a bloody mess.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

They also primarily use straight side kicks for their leg kicks do they not?
Almost never.
quote:

Why are they kicking legs at all then if it doesn't work to end a fight?
Wear down the lead leg. Slow the fighter. Set up a high kick.
quote:

What if Lee uses a push kick to over extend the knee and tear the ligaments?
Possible, but the stars would have to align. Tyson would have to have his leg in a straight and locked position.
quote:

If you don't believe that Lee could land a kick on a knee and break it, okay, just make that your argument. Don't bring up this mma stuff when you yourself are saying they aren't trying to do that.

I'm saying that of all the leg kicks in MMA, and all the shins connecting with knees, I've never seen someone bust a knee with a kick. I take issue with you making it sound so easy.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

He wasn't in the ring with people who outweighed him by nearly 80lbs. Jeebus f'n christ.
Yes he was. I think Kimo weighed around 250. Royce is 175.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

I'm guessing this hypothetical wrestler is going to ground and pound once on top.
We're talking about a street fight. Isn't that was wrestlers do? Get top position. Maintain top position. GnP.
This post was edited on 2/14/14 at 2:39 pm
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
33232 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Yes he was. I think Kimo weighed around 250. Royce is 175


Royce's fighting style is MUCH more suited to take on a larger foe than Lee's. Apples to oranges.
Posted by PapiGogo
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since May 2012
382 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:42 pm to
You must be drunk if you are debating this.

Tyson was destroy Lee. Lee was a teacher and a movie star. He was never involved in competitive tournaments. Kung Fu doesn't work as a real world fighting style. Have you ever seen an MMA fighter specialize in Kung Fu? No, but if you did, he'd be destroyed by the boxers, wrestlers, and submission specialists.

Mike Tyson actually competed against real men and dominated. Hell, he unified the heavyweight titles. In his prime, he'd beat just about anyone (including Bruce Lee).

That being said, I'd put almost any elite MMA fighter up against either of them. Neither boxing or "Kung Fu" are real world applicable.
This post was edited on 2/14/14 at 2:44 pm
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Royce's fighting style is MUCH more suited to take on a larger foe than Lee's. Apples to oranges.
I know. Just pointing out that Royce was in the ring with guys that had 80lbs on him.
Jump to page
Page First 31 32 33 34 35 ... 62
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 33 of 62Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram