Started By
Message

re: Scifi fans, do you look down Star Wars and do you consider it to be scifi?

Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:18 am to
Posted by theliontamer
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2015
1875 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:18 am to
I think the film's abstract setting opens the door for either designation. A long time ago in a galaxy far away.
Posted by LSUtiger89
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
4546 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:22 am to
quote:

fiction based on imagined future scientific


No because it was a long, long time ago... not future
Posted by MojoGuyPan
Intercession City, Florida
Member since Jun 2018
2797 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:23 am to
quote:

To me it's fantasy with space ships.


Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14912 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:32 am to
It may be science fiction but the science is terrible. So yes, I look down on it.
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
9052 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:59 am to
There is overlap in a lot of scifi/fantasy... Look at classics like Dune
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

I prefer hard scifi where everything has to be plausible


This is a largely niche category, particularly when considering film aka how most people consume sci-fi.

Star Wars is a classic mix with strong sci fi and fantasy elements along with the hero's journey tropes and historic mythology.

Basically it represents the true core of what makes up most sci-fi / fantasy stories (which are two sides of the same coin)
Posted by LSU Coyote
Member since Sep 2007
56247 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 12:04 pm to
Star Wars is not SciFi.

The only thing that really felt SciFi are the EU/Legends material.

Now they will most likely destroy that by going into the Unknown Regions. Which was awesome because did enough to venture into the regions but still keep it weird.
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

There is overlap in a lot of scifi/fantasy... Look at classics like Dune



they are basically the same thing story structure wise - just were people able to travel / fight / etc. with magic or using technology
Posted by Crawdaddy
Slidell. The jewel of Louisiana
Member since Sep 2006
19099 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 12:07 pm to
Wouldn't all the warp speed traveling cause all kinds of aging to the folks they left and came back to
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
61601 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

frequently portraying space or time travel and life on other planets.

So it's SciFi?

Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53575 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 12:21 pm to
Star Wars is some lame shite. AND it is a "Space Opera" and not SciFi. Your assessment that it's "fantasy" is the equivalent of mine, so I agree with you.
This post was edited on 11/12/19 at 12:22 pm
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Star Wars is some lame shite. AND it is a "Space Opera" and not SciFi. Your assessment that it's "fantasy" is the equivalent of mine, so I agree with you.



What about Dune? Curious if you call that fantasy or sci fi

ETA: sci-fi vs. fantasy both are very young genres - while there was certainly some stuff dating back into the 1800's for both, both genres really entered their own at the same time around the 1940's - 1950's with Asmiov, Henlein, etc. on the sci-fi side and Tolkein on the fantasy side.
This post was edited on 11/12/19 at 12:31 pm
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53575 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 12:41 pm to
Wasn't "Dune" a sci fi novel first?
Posted by eScott
Member since Oct 2008
11376 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Wouldn't all the warp speed traveling cause all kinds of aging to the folks they left and came back to


No, that's not how warp speed works.

quote:

That’s why we need to look at Einstein’s later theory, the general theory of relativity, which describes how gravity affects the shape of space and flow of time. Imagine a stretched-out sheet. If you place a bowling ball in the middle of the sheet, the sheet will warp as the weight of the ball pushes down on it. If you place a baseball on the same sheet, it will roll toward the bowling ball. This is a simple design, and space doesn’t act like a two-dimensional bed sheet, but it can be applied to something like our solar system. More massive objects like our sun can warp space and affect the orbits of the surrounding planets. The planets don’t fall into the sun, of course, because of the high speeds at which they travel.


quote:

The ability to manipulate space is the most important concept in regard to warp speed. If the Enterprise could warp the space-time continuum by expanding the area behind it and contracting the area in front, the crew could avoid going the speed of light. As long as it creates its own gravitational field, the starship could travel locally at very slow velocities, therefore avoiding the pitfalls of Newton’s third law of motion and keeping clocks in sync with its launch site and destination. The ship isn’t really traveling at a “speed,” per se—it’s more like it’s pulling its destination toward it while pushing its starting point back.
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
14923 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 1:06 pm to
Star Trek, Alien, Alien covenant, Prometheus, Silent Running, Fahrenheit 451 (70's ver), BSG,
Those are real Sci Fi.

Star Wars is King Arthur and the Singing Sword.
This post was edited on 11/12/19 at 1:08 pm
Posted by colorchangintiger
Dan Carlin
Member since Nov 2005
30979 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

fiction based on imagined future scientific or technological advances
quote:

So yeah Star Wars fits that
quote:

A Long Time Ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away
Posted by TigerDeacon
West Monroe, LA
Member since Sep 2003
29862 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

I was a die hard fan growing up. I literally could not care any less about it at this point. It's like they got together and came up with a list of things guaranteed to implode the franchise and piss everybody off, and then said, "yeah let's roll with that."


While I agree the prequels were pretty bad, Rogue One was excellent and despite what some say the Han Solo movie wasn't bad at all.

While I personally had some issues with Force Awakens and Last Jedi, they were enjoyable and were by far improvements over the prequels.

Oh and for context, I saw Star Wars in theaters in the 70s.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49479 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 2:15 pm to
Picking up the slack for oweo?
This post was edited on 11/12/19 at 2:15 pm
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Disney killed Star Wars.
def not a murder mystery, huh
Posted by NOLALGD
Member since May 2014
2692 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 2:17 pm to
I've never heard of Star Wars being held up as the definitive sci-fi movie. Space epic, maybe...

And someone else posted this...

quote:

There is a sliding scale of a sci-fi. SW just tends to be on the “soft” end of the scale while something like 2001 ends up on the “hard” end.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram