- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist is proud to harass families of children who were killed
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:00 am to TX Tiger
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:00 am to TX Tiger
quote:
It’s a Yahoo article. It’s self evident.
That alone should raise suspicion even where there was none before.
It's actually an Insider Inc. article. Which is a subsidiary of Axel Springer, a German based publishing house.
...But I'm guessing you'll just come up with something for that too?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:02 am to TX Tiger
quote:
It’s a Yahoo article. It’s self evident.
That alone should raise suspicion even where there was none before.
Just because Yahoo is a shite/biased source doesn't mean they would get something this easy, wrong.
Do you believe that on December 14, 2012, Adam Lanza killed 20 schoolchildren at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, CT, United States of America?
Yes or no.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:03 am to Bronc
Oh golly, no. I would never question the media.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:04 am to TX Tiger
quote:
It’s a Yahoo article.
It’s actually an Insider article that Yahoo has on their site. I don’t think Yahoo has actual journalists anymore. They just aggregate articles from other sources on their News page.
Original Insider article
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:04 am to TX Tiger
quote:
Sadly telling about our culture when thinking is ridiculed.
I’m ridiculing this whole self righteous but still somehow refusing to answer anyone’s direct questions act you have going. You just sound like a dumbass at this point
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:05 am to TX Tiger
quote:
Oh golly, no. I would never question the media.
Using critical thinking skills as you navigate news sources is not the issue, the issue is you claiming the article not credible, then refusing to qualify that statement beyond yAhOo bAd, yAhoO nO tRuSt?
Do you think they made up Kelly Watt's quotes? Or that she is correct and Insider is unfairly not buying in?
Give me your thesis here.
This post was edited on 6/15/22 at 8:09 am
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:05 am to SlowFlowPro
He’s not going to answer. He’s a provocateur.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:12 am to Ed Osteen
quote:
I’m ridiculing this whole self righteous but still somehow refusing to answer anyone’s direct questions act you have going. You just sound like a dumbass at this point
I've already answered every question that's been asked in this thread. The fact that they keep getting asked over and over again shows how much research those posters do in any given situation, which falls in line with them believing what they're told by the media so that they don't have to do any work on their own to find truth.
Sorry if facts upset you, but I don't feel I should be asked to apologize for other people's laziness.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:12 am to TX Tiger
quote:Are you going to provide your sources of information at some point?
TX Tiger
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:15 am to Palantir
No. He’s going to vaguely insinuate that only he is capable of researching things on Google, and avoid any detailed discussion of his view on the subject.
This post was edited on 6/15/22 at 8:18 am
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:20 am to Bronc
quote:Made them up? No. Strategically used them in combination with their own agenda to make it appear she said things she didn't say? Absolutely. That's how propaganda works. That's how the mainstream media works. That should be obvious to everyone by now.
Do you think they made up Kelly Watt's quotes?
quote:Correct about what? All she said is that she's proud of her efforts to find the truth. Do I think she is correct in being proud of her efforts to find the truth? Yes.
Or that she is correct and Insider is unfairly not buying in?
quote:There's no great awakening here, it's media propaganda 101. It's no different than the hit pieces they ran on Trump. It's what they do. It's what they are paid to do. It's why they exist. You would have thought that in 2022 this would be long since self evident.
Give me your thesis here.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:22 am to Baw Vivant
quote:
it’s about teaching her to keep her retarded opinions to herself. You know, like all the rest of us do on a daily basis.
Social media has allowed idiots to congregate with other idiots and share their idiotic ideas.
Previously they just believed they were alone.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:28 am to Indefatigable
quote:
He’s not going to answer. He’s a provocateur.
He's a pussy and always has been. Real CT-promoters have balls and are clear about their beliefs. They just use circular arguments to create the appearance of logic. TX has always just thrown out the circular arguments and "is just asking questions" but doesn't have the balls to state his beliefs.
Also, Sandy Hook truthers are deranged. Sandy Hook is a very straightforward scenario that isn't really that interesting to be honest. Crafting a CT out of the facts requires a true level of delusion that's hard for me to understand. Nothing will ever change their minds. Even if you could magically transport them to the actual scene, they would just spin it into saying those aren't really the kids of the actors and are sex trafficking victims or some other double down. The irony is most of this CT is based on shitty early reporting from a media they claim you can't trust.
If you want a shooting that has real CT projections, look no further than the Las Vegas shooting from 2017. THAT one leaves some real questions.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:It has nothing to do with getting it right or wrong. You know as well as I do that the media has an agenda, and carrying out that agenda is priority No. 1 - not whether they are right or wrong.
It’s a Yahoo article. It’s self evident.
That alone should raise suspicion even where there was none before.
Just because Yahoo is a shite/biased source doesn't mean they would get something this easy, wrong.
quote:I compare it to 9/11.
Do you believe that on December 14, 2012, Adam Lanza killed 20 schoolchildren at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, CT, United States of America?
Did something happen and people were killed? Yes.
Did it happen the way the media wants me to believe it happened? frick no. Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe someone who does nothing but lie to them all the time?
I still can't believe this is even a question. Yet, still, there are people who believe the 2020 "election" was fair, and that O.J. is innocent.
What are ya gonna do?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He's a pussy and always has been.
You know how I know the people I've handed their arse to over the years on this board?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:31 am to Indefatigable
quote:
No. He’s going to vaguely insinuate that only he is capable of researching things on Google, and avoid any detailed discussion of his view on the subject.
TX once told me that he believed that each branch of the Rothschilds had multiple trillions of dollars in assets. I think it may have gotten into the hundreds of trillions in assets each.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:32 am to TX Tiger
quote:How does the media want you to believe it happened?
Did it happen the way the media wants me to believe it happened?
Do you have information to discount the incident occurred generally the way it has been reported or you just don’t believe anything that is ever reported because media is often biased or pushing an agenda?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:32 am to Byrdybyrd05
quote:
This bitch is evil and needs the biggest arse beating from those families that she is harassing.
She may post on the political board.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 8:33 am to TX Tiger
quote:
Did it happen the way the media wants me to believe it happened? frick no. Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe someone who does nothing but lie to them all the time?
Sometimes a story is so straightforward there is no reason to lie.
What about Sandy Hook makes you believe it isn't a straightforward story where Adam Lanza killed 20 children at an elementary school? What piece of evidence makes it seem so strange that a fake story is necessary?
Popular
Back to top


1








