- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:11 pm to Ghazi
Just Belarus lost 2.3 million people in the war, more than 25% of its population.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:51 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
The Soviets would not have been able to stay in the war early, once Barbarossa started, without American material and supplies.
America's lend-lease didn't even really make an impact until 1943. The impact by the UK's contributions were felt by mid 42. Barbarossa was a failure because the Soviets beat them. Case Blue was a failure because the Soviets beat them. Germany had no chance of winning after 41 and it had nothing to do with American/allied lend-lease.
quote:
At the end of the day, both the Allies (UK, US, France, et al) and the Soviets would have eventually won World War 2, with or without the other. The Axis never had a plausible and sustainable path to victory.
Bingo.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:15 pm to Ghazi
Watch Enemy at the Gates. It ends with the Battle of Stalingrad which was basically a meat grinder scenario for both sides!
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:33 pm to rmnldr
Hitler didn’t eve give a shite about beating the Russians at the end, he cared about finishing the final solution
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:33 pm to Ghazi
Russia. Not Russians lol
Posted on 2/19/19 at 8:18 pm to Ghazi
#FreeMisterP
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News