- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rittenhouse NOT GUILTY on all counts; concern over violence and riots growing
Posted on 11/21/21 at 7:54 am to idlewatcher
Posted on 11/21/21 at 7:54 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Wonder where that photo was taken. That’s the same suit and tie he had on during the verdict I believe.
That is not the shirt and tie he was wearing during the verdict. He was wearing that horrible maroon colored shirt for the verdict. He did wear that blue as seen in the picture at least one day during the trial.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 10:54 am to TDTOM
I finally got around to really watching the entire original video in detail.
1) The kid probably shouldn’t have been charged. The video conclusively shows they were the aggressors the entire time. Poor DA had no choice due to media swarm but i bet the grand jury even had doubts.
2) This is Darwin principle in action, charge a guy with loaded AR-15, you are probably going to die. (I would have killed them all before they got within 20 feet of me, but would have given them a few tracer rounds over their heads first. Yeah a have them and whistlers, and half a dozen r so AR-15s But i am old and mean )
3)Funny part is the kid trying to surrender, cops keep driving by him, tell him to get off street. (He doesn’t look like a killer)
4) Jury verdict is 100% correct, they will loss civil trial too if they sue him.
Justice was served, end of story.
1) The kid probably shouldn’t have been charged. The video conclusively shows they were the aggressors the entire time. Poor DA had no choice due to media swarm but i bet the grand jury even had doubts.
2) This is Darwin principle in action, charge a guy with loaded AR-15, you are probably going to die. (I would have killed them all before they got within 20 feet of me, but would have given them a few tracer rounds over their heads first. Yeah a have them and whistlers, and half a dozen r so AR-15s But i am old and mean )
3)Funny part is the kid trying to surrender, cops keep driving by him, tell him to get off street. (He doesn’t look like a killer)
4) Jury verdict is 100% correct, they will loss civil trial too if they sue him.
Justice was served, end of story.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 10:57 am to TutHillTiger
quote:
Poor DA had no choice due to media swarm but i bet the grand jury even had doubts.
At some point, such people HAVE to stop giving in to this mentality.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 11:24 am to member12
Can Kyle join the military or become a LEO if he wants too?
Posted on 11/21/21 at 11:45 am to danilo
Guy walks into a bar and says, "I'd like a Rittenhouse."
Bartender says, "I've never heard of that drink?"
Guy says, "It's a Chaser followed by three Shots."
Bartender says, "I've never heard of that drink?"
Guy says, "It's a Chaser followed by three Shots."
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:25 pm to Lithium
The amount of idiots screaming he brought a gun across state lines is alarming.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:29 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
The amount of idiots screaming he brought a gun across state lines is alarming.
Further magnified by the fact that it is not illegal to do so
18 U.S. Code § 926A - Interstate transportation of firearms
quote:
Notwithstanding any other provision of any law or any rule or regulation of a State or any political subdivision thereof, any person who is not otherwise prohibited by this chapter from transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm shall be entitled to transport a firearm for any lawful purpose from any place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm to any other place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm if, during such transportation the firearm is unloaded, and neither the firearm nor any ammunition being transported is readily accessible or is directly accessible from the passenger compartment of such transporting vehicle: Provided, That in the case of a vehicle without a compartment separate from the driver’s compartment the firearm or ammunition shall be contained in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:30 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
The amount of idiots screaming he brought a gun across state lines is alarming.
Is there some law about crossing state lines I'm unfamiliar with? He possessed the gun legally in WI, so I really don't get what point these people are trying to make. Morons
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:32 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
The amount of idiots screaming he brought a gun across state lines is alarming.
They read it and believe it's true.
They're woefully uninformed people.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:37 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
The amount of idiots screaming he brought a gun across state lines is alarming.
And that he “wasn’t from there and went to cause trouble” when he lived closer than any of the “victims” who were there to “mostly peacefully fiery protest”?
And the whole ordeal had nothing to do with race in any way yet it’s shoehorned into a racial discussion?
None of the liberal or media narratives in this trial make any sense other than just vitriol against KR for basically being white and existing, and not on “their side”
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:38 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:they keep saying because their heroes the politicians and celebrities keep saying it.
They read it and believe it's true.
They're woefully uninformed people.
The truth is irrelevant to a certain percentage of the population.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:43 pm to CAD703X
quote:
they keep saying because their heroes the politicians and celebrities keep saying it.
Exactly. They need to be told what to believe.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:44 pm to CAD703X
This is from a friend’s family‘s FB feed (so not a bot though it sounds like one)
They also seem to not know one of the guys he shot lived even further away from Kenosha and carried a gun himself.

They also seem to not know one of the guys he shot lived even further away from Kenosha and carried a gun himself.
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:52 pm to 1BamaRTR
Meanwhile in another thread some comedian is saying I need to unite with these fricktards so that the elites will stop manipulating all of us.
Hard pass.
Hard pass.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 2:37 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
Poor DA had no choice due to media swarm but i bet the grand jury even had doubts.
1) No the elected DA should have done his job and refused to prosecute an obviously innocent person.
2) I am almost positive no grand jury was convened, just homicide charges filed within two days of the shooting. And DA announced almost simultaneously that the officer who shot Blake wouldn’t face charges.
Thank God the jury decision to look at the evidence and not all the spaghetti the prosecution threw at the wall.
Posted on 11/21/21 at 2:44 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
They're woefully uninformed people.
They are uninformed because they can only make decisions based on the MSM.
Since they are constantly being fed propaganda they are always uninformed.
Popular
Back to top
