- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question about the Algerian shemale boxer:
Posted on 8/2/24 at 12:28 pm to mmcgrath
Posted on 8/2/24 at 12:28 pm to mmcgrath
I want to see a story come a out about the Algerian competing in the Olympics so she can try to have trans surgery to be a man in France.
Then all the far right people have to back track from calling her a man.
Then all the far right people have to back track from calling her a man.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 12:33 pm to crazy4lsu
What was wrong with the below?
I used grades of genital masculinization because with this boxer it appears a choice was made early on if not at birth. The scale isn’t just used for androgen insensitivity syndrome, but those grades basically correlate with individual’s androgen insensitivity.
Is it exact or can you list a specific level of androgens for each grade and person? Can you predict what specific level of androgen therapy will trigger specific masculinizing effects? Of course not. I never said that.
I said earlier in thread in response to someone saying testosterone test was good enough to show athletic advantages that even for the most feminine XY androgen insensitivity syndrome without any androgen therapy the testosterone levels would likely be in the male range and maybe higher regardless of actual benefit if any at all in some cases.
What’s considered normal testosterone has a large range for age groups. Even with that some men with low end normal ranges actual require and benefit from therapy while others don’t need it. Some may be good with what’s considered low. Why would one think that is any different with androgen insensitivity syndrome without?
quote:
With androgen insensitivity syndrome a grade 1 is likely to less androgen insensitive than a grade 2 is, and so on until you get to complete androgen insensitivity at 6/7.
I used grades of genital masculinization because with this boxer it appears a choice was made early on if not at birth. The scale isn’t just used for androgen insensitivity syndrome, but those grades basically correlate with individual’s androgen insensitivity.
Is it exact or can you list a specific level of androgens for each grade and person? Can you predict what specific level of androgen therapy will trigger specific masculinizing effects? Of course not. I never said that.
I said earlier in thread in response to someone saying testosterone test was good enough to show athletic advantages that even for the most feminine XY androgen insensitivity syndrome without any androgen therapy the testosterone levels would likely be in the male range and maybe higher regardless of actual benefit if any at all in some cases.
What’s considered normal testosterone has a large range for age groups. Even with that some men with low end normal ranges actual require and benefit from therapy while others don’t need it. Some may be good with what’s considered low. Why would one think that is any different with androgen insensitivity syndrome without?
This post was edited on 8/2/24 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 8/2/24 at 12:34 pm to BET
quote:
Leftwing nut case = answers with insults.
You're a grown arse alleged man who has admitted to knowing nothing about this situation, yet you keep talking and spewing bullshite. All you deserve is a frick you.
This post was edited on 8/2/24 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 8/2/24 at 12:38 pm to ThoseGuys
quote:
I want to see a story come a out about the Algerian competing in the Olympics so she can try to have trans surgery to be a man in France.
Then all the far right people have to back track from calling her a man.
Yeah it’s just the far right. Keep smoking that leftist turd.
Why would an XY need surgery to become a man?
This post was edited on 8/2/24 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 8/2/24 at 12:48 pm to Ingeniero
The follow up on Caster showed her married to a female.
Pictures of Caster and of the Algerian show faces that might be either/or for their society. Then look at hand size. Look at chin lines, look at the way they walk. The way they sit, dare I add the Mansplaning way of sitting?
I'd guess the testosterone in the Algerian dominated from the cellular level.
Pictures of Caster and of the Algerian show faces that might be either/or for their society. Then look at hand size. Look at chin lines, look at the way they walk. The way they sit, dare I add the Mansplaning way of sitting?
I'd guess the testosterone in the Algerian dominated from the cellular level.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 12:48 pm to dallastigers
quote:
Is it exact or can you list a specific level of androgens for each grade and person? Can you predict what specific level of androgen therapy will trigger specific masculinizing effects? Of course not. I never said that.
Because of androgen physiology. Typically Leydig cell secretion maintains a steep downhill concentration gradient into the bloodstream which can modulate androgenic effects on distant target tissues. When there is a disorder characterized by hormone resistance, you are going to get completely variable, tissue-dependent effects. Hence why you need to differentiate between primary, secondary, and tertiary androgenic effects. Categorizing one as a proxy for the others isn't the way the spectrum of the disorder will work, physiologically speaking.
If for example the patient has a disorder on the gene which encodes the steroid nuclear receptor superfamily, which is on the X chromosome, you are going to have a completely inconsistent pattern of gene expression because steroids will interface with the binding domain to produce transcriptional activity. In other words, we describe these disorders as a 'spectrum' precisely because there is a spectrum in the symptomatology. Where transcriptional activity is not affected, you might see normal development, but given that will be variable depending on the specific type of dysfunction, dysregulation, or mutation. If the patient has 'complete' androgen insensitivity, which means that their is no transcriptional activity or modulation from androgens, the amount of testosterone they produce is not meaningful because they simply cannot use it.
quote:
Some may good with what’s considered low
I've never seen a patient with what is considered 'low testosterone' that didn't already complain of the classic symptomatology of low testosterone FWIW.
It seems like you aren't understanding that because of the tissue specific nature of androgen dysfunction, using external genitalia as a proxy for overall androgen function, which is important because in this case it is the secondary effects of testosterone that are at issue, isn't a good metric.
This post was edited on 8/2/24 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 8/2/24 at 1:26 pm to dallastigers
quote:Because she has a vagina and no penis.
Why would an XY need surgery to become a man?
We didn’t know how to test chromosomes til the 1900s
You know how they determined male and female then? Vagina or penis. This one has a vagina. Female
This post was edited on 8/2/24 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 8/2/24 at 1:30 pm to lsupride87
quote:quote:
Why would an XY need surgery to become a man?
Because she has a vagina and no penis.
Keep going. You're this close to getting him to say "some men have vaginas"
Posted on 8/2/24 at 1:32 pm to dallastigers
What the frick is an XY? I thought it was male and female. 2 genders. So is it male, female, and XY? And you're saying XY wouldn't need to transition to a male, so does that mean XY is male? So the boxer is a male? Like with a penis and everything. Because if she has a vagina and not a penis that means they transition from male to female. But in Algers it's illegal to do that. So I'm confused as frick.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 1:35 pm to ThoseGuys
We have transitioned to the point hard core conservatives now agree males can have vaginas. It’s great 
Posted on 8/2/24 at 1:45 pm to lsupride87
I gotta be honest, it's weird for me because I have always believed we have two genders. Yeah life isn't black and white and there is rare cases of some people born with both parts. But that shite ain't common enough to be a big deal. You have two genders and like 1 in a few hundred thousand you got Bill who's a little different.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 1:51 pm to ThoseGuys
quote:
1 in a few hundred thousand you got Bill who's a little different.
Yes, a birth defect.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 2:04 pm to ThoseGuys
quote:
Because if she has a vagina and not a penis that means they transition from male to female. But in Algers it's illegal to do that. So I'm confused as frick.
Indeed, you are.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 2:24 pm to ThoseGuys
quote:
So I'm confused as frick.
I bet this is common for you.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 2:37 pm to dallastigers
First Dallas, not arguing with you.
there needs to be a solution. what is your solution? One possible idea is to tell the crazies to F off. Or, test for testosterone levels. Or, birth sex only.
that was not meant for you, necessarily. more referring to the people making (or not making) these decisions.
Using the google machine, 1.7% of the population is born with both organs. there needs to be a solution for the masses, without allowances for the 1.7%.
quote:
Just testing for testosterone levels is an overly simplistic and a “feel better” solution for a much more complex situation.
there needs to be a solution. what is your solution? One possible idea is to tell the crazies to F off. Or, test for testosterone levels. Or, birth sex only.
quote:
What certain agenda? Protecting women’s sports???
that was not meant for you, necessarily. more referring to the people making (or not making) these decisions.
Using the google machine, 1.7% of the population is born with both organs. there needs to be a solution for the masses, without allowances for the 1.7%.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 2:38 pm to AlonsoWDC
shite man, now it is. fricking left wing people and right wing people trying to make everything so fricking complicated just for some political statements.
Is it a dude or not? Cause no dude I know has a vagina. They either trans or a chick. I'm not out here calling Gina Carano no dude just cause she more masculine than a lot of guys now.
Is it a dude or not? Cause no dude I know has a vagina. They either trans or a chick. I'm not out here calling Gina Carano no dude just cause she more masculine than a lot of guys now.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 2:55 pm to No Colors
quote:
I believe the boxer was born with female genitals, but with testicles inside her body. She is a she and has never identified as gay or Trans or any of that. But she has a high level of T due to the presence of the testicles.
Something along those lines
So XY genetics with nondescendant testicles that produce testosterone like any other male unless her testes were removed before puberty?
I'd be interested in knowing if she has testes still present.
Posted on 8/2/24 at 2:58 pm to Screaming Viking
quote:
there needs to be a solution for the masses, without allowances for the 1.7%.
Sometimes it feels like we live in a world with solutions for the few with exceptions for some of the masses.
Popular
Back to top


2







