- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:43 am to Red Stick Tigress
yea i edited to tallahassee. drove to orlando recently, so it was on my mind. nice boom though. way to stick to the points.
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:45 am to TigerRob20
I like it although I don't think it will solve all of the problems.
It provides a bypass east and west.
It allows people of central or Zachary that work south of Baton Rouge or on the otherside of the river to bypass central Baton Rouge.
If the public private partnership can work at a reasonable ratio of cost to the city/state then I think it makes sense.
It provides a bypass east and west.
It allows people of central or Zachary that work south of Baton Rouge or on the otherside of the river to bypass central Baton Rouge.
If the public private partnership can work at a reasonable ratio of cost to the city/state then I think it makes sense.
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:46 am to link
quote:
edited to tallahassee
It should be Jacksonsville, the end of the road
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:47 am to TigerRob20
Actually that's the best plan that I've seen so far for BR.
I'm assuming that feeder roads adjacent to the freeway won't be tolled?
I'm assuming that feeder roads adjacent to the freeway won't be tolled?
This post was edited on 9/23/15 at 11:50 am
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:47 am to link
quote:The interstate needs frontage roads in town before and after the split, too. The Washington Street and Perkins Overpass crowds are going to be mad, but it needs to happen.
probably, yes. but i still think fixing the bottleneck at the split will do more.
And more options. If we just had more options.
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:48 am to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
I realize that, but north BR is not where the people live or where the people are trying to get.
You don't make a loop to bring people where they want to go in the city. You do it to allow non BR people a route around BR traffic. Clear them out of the city and that helps flow on the interstate.
It seems like it would make sense to go south of the city but you don't want to connect I10 to I10 because I12 is the real long distance route needed to be connected with a loop. This isn't to get people going to Nola faster... It's to get 18 wheelers out of our city that are going cross country.
This post was edited on 9/23/15 at 11:50 am
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:48 am to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
The loop should be south of I-10, not north. Who wants a 23 mile loop running north of BR?
People won don't want to sit in traffic next time some a-hole in a big rig shuts down I-10.
As said early, I-12 is route of choice for long distance travelers. I-12 is basically New Orleans's bypass.
This post was edited on 9/23/15 at 11:51 am
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:49 am to GeauxxxTigers23
wow, does it? that's great. it also goes past los angeles to santa monica. who cares.
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:50 am to Shexter
quote:
..... AECOM has identified a plan to help relieve
1-10 congestion by providing a new free flow tollway (60-70 mph) linking the regional interstate systems on each
side of the Mississippi River. ..... Access to existing business and other land uses along the corridor will be maintained through a free system of frontage roads using existing right of way.
https://wwwsp.dotd.la.gov/Inside_LaDOTD/Divisions/Administration/LTA/Misc%20Documents/AECOM%20Unsoliticed%20Proposal%20BUMP.pdf
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:52 am to TigerRob20
Looking at that I would think making an 1-12 loop and an 1-10 loop and having that as the 1-12 loop would be acceptable although you would have to completely revamp the Airine/i-12 interchange. But it still assures that 1-10 will be a shite show. The solution there is to bypass both bridges and building a connection from 1-10 west of port Allen to a new bridge south of Baton Rouge.
IMHO.
IMHO.
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:52 am to Shexter
A tollway with free one-way frontage roads (feeder roads) with adequate turnarounds would be the obvious answer.
I think there is plenty of right-of-way for this already.
I think there is plenty of right-of-way for this already.
This post was edited on 9/23/15 at 11:52 am
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:52 am to SouthOfSouth
Completing I-49 South in Lafayette to New Orleans would be better than a loop around Baton Rouge.
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:52 am to link
You need to calm the frick down.
And Jacksonville is like 6 times bigger than Tallahassee so its relevant
And Jacksonville is like 6 times bigger than Tallahassee so its relevant
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:53 am to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
Completing I-49 South in Lafayette to New Orleans would be better than a loop around Baton Rouge.
For New Orleans perhaps. Not for Baton Rouge.
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:53 am to goofball
It would take a huge part of the truck traffic out of BR.
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:54 am to goofball
quote:
For New Orleans perhaps. Not for Baton Rouge.
Well it gets that traffic off the road. Still need a bridge between Addis and SE EBR...but
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:56 am to Golfer
quote:
Still need a bridge between Addis and SE EBR
Or anywhere in Iberville Parish...
All of that plant traffic clogging up the bridge
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:56 am to Lsupimp
quote:
The solution there is to bypass both bridges and building a connection from 1-10 west of port Allen to a new bridge south of Baton Rouge.
Yeah but this is like $2 billion dollars cheaper than that idea.
This post was edited on 9/23/15 at 11:57 am
Popular
Back to top



1






