- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Property Dispute-SITUATION RESOLVED!!!!!!!!
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:53 am to FalseProphet
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:53 am to FalseProphet
quote:
acquisitive prescription
quote:
thirty years
This is more of what I was referring to.
quote:
thirty years without interruption, within visible bounds, more land than their title called for
And "within visible bounds" means "fenced" to me... not just mowed or picked up the pecans over there.
0
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:53 am to FalseProphet
quote:
FalseProphet
Maybe there's Black Gold, Texas Tea under the Pecans
162. Suspension of acquisitive prescription
A cause that suspends the running of the prescription of nonuse applicable to mineral rights has no effect on the accrual of acquisitive prescription in favor of one possessing the surface of the land as owner insofar as his possession may include mineral rights. However, if an obstacle to use of a mineral right is created by an adverse possessor, the accrual of acquisitive prescription as to the right is suspended in the same manner as the prescription of nonuse.
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:53 am to geauxcats10
"Psycho Coon arse Property" sounds like a nice mixed use development. Is that a Tommy Spinosa venture?
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:53 am to FAF
quote:
Now you know why the previous owner sold it to you.
Booom, troof hurts!
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:54 am to geauxcats10
I developed a subdivision once and there was a lady that had installed her sewer system onto the land I had bought. The incompetent parish sanitation dept didn't want to deal with it because it was their screw up too for signing off on the permits for it.
I could have dug it up and dropped in on her property had I wanted to. Instead of dragging out any legal dealings I just cut that part out of my subdivision and sold it to her for 25% above appraised value. She still came out ahead vs having to relocate the system.
The bad thing is I owner financed it for 3 years and 7 years later she still has not paid it off. She has paid me almost triple in late fees and penalties vs what the property is worth.
I could have dug it up and dropped in on her property had I wanted to. Instead of dragging out any legal dealings I just cut that part out of my subdivision and sold it to her for 25% above appraised value. She still came out ahead vs having to relocate the system.
The bad thing is I owner financed it for 3 years and 7 years later she still has not paid it off. She has paid me almost triple in late fees and penalties vs what the property is worth.
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:54 am to geauxcats10
quote:
I want that land.i paid for that land... From where he put his stake out I would lose almost 75' of frontage. That's where my fence and shop is going.
He has to leave his house sometime.
Wait till he leaves.
Chainsaw those frickers to the ground.
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:54 am to FalseProphet
Must be possessed for 30 years without interruption
So False Prophet esquire... every time a new survey occurred and someone new laid claim does that constitute interruption?
So False Prophet esquire... every time a new survey occurred and someone new laid claim does that constitute interruption?
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:54 am to Broke
quote:
I paid a graffitti artist $100 to paint a pink vagina on the side facing her house.
If this is true, can we get a pic?
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:55 am to Tigerlaff
quote:
The guy threatened him. I liked depressed, nihilistic you better than zen you.
Then frick all the trees, frick the neighbor, frick his daughter named Amberlynne and frick his coonass friends that rut up your yard one night and leave yeti stickers on your fence
This post was edited on 10/8/14 at 11:02 am
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:55 am to FalseProphet
I would say the ditch, according to his sketch, are the visible bounds. whoever dug it knew where the property line was
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:56 am to geauxcats10
Did you explain why you are cutting down the Pecan trees?
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:57 am to Chicken
I'm cutting them down as to build a shop and place a fence along the property line
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:57 am to pointdog33
quote:
So False Prophet esquire... every time a new survey occurred and someone new laid claim does that constitute interruption?
I have no idea, and I don't have full knowledge of the facts of the case.
If Redneck neighbor's account is true that his family maintained those trees since he was a child, I'd think he'd have at least a colorable claim, regardless of the latest survey.
ETA: And why the sarcasm? You haven't posted anything that's remotely correct in this thread, and you're mad that I called you out on it?
This post was edited on 10/8/14 at 10:58 am
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:57 am to aaronb023
quote:
I would say the ditch, according to his sketch, are the visible bounds. whoever dug it knew where the property line was
The ditch is a parish servitude
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:58 am to Chicken
quote:
Did you explain why you are cutting down the Pecan trees?
Even if he leaves them up, the battle over ownage is still there.
The guy obviously believes they are his trees on his property.
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:58 am to geauxcats10
Have the property resurveyed.
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:58 am to Chicken
pecan wood makes for BGE fodder... chop'em down ! 
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:59 am to FalseProphet
quote:
If Redneck neighbor's account is true that his family maintained those trees since he was a child, I'd think he'd have at least a colorable claim, regardless of the latest survey.
But wouldn't they have to actually at some point in time file their claim to it?
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:59 am to geauxcats10
quote:
This dude never owned the property the trees were on.. From what the cops stated to me he used to play around those trees as a kid or something and pick pecans with his dad. He's a loose nut.
Now we have the heart of the problem. Dude has sentimental attachment to the trees.
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:59 am to geauxcats10
quote:
I want that land.i paid for that land... From where he put his stake out I would lose almost 75' of frontage. That's where my fence and shop is going.
Whoa there big fella.
That's all yoU had to say.
Although some pecans on your property are a terrible thing to kill senselessly...
Page 8 of 17
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News