- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:05 am to fouldeliverer
quote:
Because eliminating high-capacity magazines and military style weapons is a completely tyrannical violation of the Second Amendment
Fgts like you are the absolute worst.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:06 am to terd ferguson
quote:
You probably wouldn't even need to do that. The average AR is what... 40" or less? You could fit a few in an oversized bag.
I mainly just wanted to show the separation of the upper and lower. If the guy stayed there for a few days like reported, getting 8 guns in the room would be easy
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:06 am to RATeamWannabe
quote:
Do we not already have a cap on high capacity magazines?
None
Not entirely true... it varies by state. In LA there are none but in CA I think its 10rd.
It wouldn't matter anyway. There are so many high capacity magazines out there (I used to have probably 30 or more 30+ rd AR mags... before the boating accident) that if you really wanted to get one to commit a crime then nothing would stop you.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:06 am to 50_Tiger
Prepare your a-hole to be mud checked
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:07 am to terd ferguson
As I said most American's agree with me, assault-style weapons (or whatever god damn phrase you want to use) and high-capacity magazines should be banned. But the NRA and their members are too powerful.
The other important part of this study is the last question about right to owning guns being essential to freedom.
This post was edited on 10/2/17 at 8:14 am
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:09 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
I mainly just wanted to show the separation of the upper and lower. If the guy stayed there for a few days like reported, getting 8 guns in the room would be easy
Agree completely. You could fill a luggage cart with 10 suitcases full of weapons and walk right through the lobby and nobody would ever know.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:09 am to fouldeliverer
I don't want to go down a road where the US government is the only entity allowed to have weapons.
That's how Communism begins.
That's how Communism begins.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:09 am to fouldeliverer
quote:
As I said most American's agree with me
"Most" Americans voted for Barack and Hillary, so not sure what you think you're proving with that statement.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:09 am to 50_Tiger
Yeah they can check me but I don't stay at hotels without at least one gun
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:12 am to 50_Tiger
"Those that give up temporary freedom for security deserve neither."- Tommy J
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:12 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
I don't want to go down a road where the US government is the only entity allowed to have weapons.
That's how Communism begins.
Lot of the baws holding them government issued death machines would keep this from happening
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:13 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
How can a dude check into a hotel with enough firepower to do that and no one raises an alarm?
Because suitcases
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:13 am to fouldeliverer
quote:
As I said most American's agree with me, assault-style weapons (or whatever god damn phrase you want to use)
That's because no one, including you, have clearly defined what these "assault-style weapons" are.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:14 am to fouldeliverer
quote:
assault-style weapons
The majority of people polled probably have no idea wtf this even means... bc it's such a ridiculous fricking term that it could be translated different ways.
Assault rifle/military rilfe used to be assumed as meaning capable of full auto. Then the libs twisted the term to "assault-style" or "military-style" which had nothing to do with anything other than the way they look.
An M-16 is a military rifle with full auto capability. An AR-15 looks exactly the same but has semi-auto only. You can buy various semi-auto rifles that fire 5.56/.223 (the same exact ammo and the same exact rate of fire) but they aren't called "assault-style" because they look different.
You post all the charts and graphs you want... you still sound ignorant as frick when you start spewing that garbage.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:14 am to fouldeliverer
quote:
If it isn't commonly used for hunting, or self-defense then it is unnecessary.
The stuff this guy used is already illegal.
Didn't seem to stop him.
This post was edited on 10/2/17 at 8:15 am
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:15 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
I don't want to go down a road where the US government is the only entity allowed to have weapons.
That's how Communism begins.
Because that's what we're talking about.
But doesn't matter anyway because Obama took everyone's guns when he instituted Sharia Law a few years ago.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:16 am to Ingeniero
quote:
That's because no one, including you, have clearly defined what these "assault-style weapons" are.
Scary black (racist) long guns, including one Joe Biden recommended
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:16 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
The stuff this guy used is already illegal.
Didn't seem to stop him.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Vegas also has laws against shooting people. Maybe they were recently enacted, and this guy juts hadn't gotten the memo yet.
Posted on 10/2/17 at 8:16 am to fouldeliverer
quote:
Because that's what we're talking about.
That's how it starts you stupid fricking moron.
Page 3 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News